Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people.
Journal
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 10 2023
11 10 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
11
10
2024
medline:
2
11
2023
pubmed:
11
10
2023
entrez:
11
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Inappropriate polypharmacy is a particular concern in older people and is associated with negative health outcomes. Choosing the best interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy is a priority, so that many medicines may be used to achieve better clinical outcomes for patients. This is the third update of this Cochrane Review. To assess the effects of interventions, alone or in combination, in improving the appropriate use of polypharmacy and reducing medication-related problems in older people. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and two trials registers up until 13 January 2021, together with handsearching of reference lists to identify additional studies. We ran updated searches in February 2023 and have added potentially eligible studies to 'Characteristics of studies awaiting classification'. For this update, we included randomised trials only. Eligible studies described interventions affecting prescribing aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy (four or more medicines) in people aged 65 years and older, which used a validated tool to assess prescribing appropriateness. These tools can be classified as either implicit tools (judgement-based/based on expert professional judgement) or explicit tools (criterion-based, comprising lists of drugs to be avoided in older people). Four review authors independently reviewed abstracts of eligible studies, and two authors extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. We pooled study-specific estimates, and used a random-effects model to yield summary estimates of effect and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the overall certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach. We identified 38 studies, which includes an additional 10 in this update. The included studies consisted of 24 randomised trials and 14 cluster-randomised trials. Thirty-six studies examined complex, multi-faceted interventions of pharmaceutical care (i.e. the responsible provision of medicines to improve patients' outcomes), in a variety of settings. Interventions were delivered by healthcare professionals such as general physicians, pharmacists, nurses and geriatricians, and most were conducted in high-income countries. Assessments using the Cochrane risk of bias tool found that there was a high and/or unclear risk of bias across a number of domains. Based on the GRADE approach, the overall certainty of evidence for each pooled outcome ranged from low to very low. It is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care improves medication appropriateness (as measured by an implicit tool) (mean difference (MD) -5.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) -9.26 to -2.06; I It is unclear whether interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy resulted in clinically significant improvement. Since the last update of this review in 2018, there appears to have been an increase in the number of studies seeking to address potential prescribing omissions and more interventions being delivered by multidisciplinary teams.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Inappropriate polypharmacy is a particular concern in older people and is associated with negative health outcomes. Choosing the best interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy is a priority, so that many medicines may be used to achieve better clinical outcomes for patients. This is the third update of this Cochrane Review.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of interventions, alone or in combination, in improving the appropriate use of polypharmacy and reducing medication-related problems in older people.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and two trials registers up until 13 January 2021, together with handsearching of reference lists to identify additional studies. We ran updated searches in February 2023 and have added potentially eligible studies to 'Characteristics of studies awaiting classification'.
SELECTION CRITERIA
For this update, we included randomised trials only. Eligible studies described interventions affecting prescribing aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy (four or more medicines) in people aged 65 years and older, which used a validated tool to assess prescribing appropriateness. These tools can be classified as either implicit tools (judgement-based/based on expert professional judgement) or explicit tools (criterion-based, comprising lists of drugs to be avoided in older people).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Four review authors independently reviewed abstracts of eligible studies, and two authors extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. We pooled study-specific estimates, and used a random-effects model to yield summary estimates of effect and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the overall certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 38 studies, which includes an additional 10 in this update. The included studies consisted of 24 randomised trials and 14 cluster-randomised trials. Thirty-six studies examined complex, multi-faceted interventions of pharmaceutical care (i.e. the responsible provision of medicines to improve patients' outcomes), in a variety of settings. Interventions were delivered by healthcare professionals such as general physicians, pharmacists, nurses and geriatricians, and most were conducted in high-income countries. Assessments using the Cochrane risk of bias tool found that there was a high and/or unclear risk of bias across a number of domains. Based on the GRADE approach, the overall certainty of evidence for each pooled outcome ranged from low to very low. It is uncertain whether pharmaceutical care improves medication appropriateness (as measured by an implicit tool) (mean difference (MD) -5.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) -9.26 to -2.06; I
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
It is unclear whether interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy resulted in clinically significant improvement. Since the last update of this review in 2018, there appears to have been an increase in the number of studies seeking to address potential prescribing omissions and more interventions being delivered by multidisciplinary teams.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37818791
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008165.pub5
pmc: PMC10565901
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01034761']
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
CD008165Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateOf
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Références
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):195
pubmed: 28854884
Trials. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):158
pubmed: 28372591
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 31;19(11):
pubmed: 35682331
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Dec;48(12):1546-54
pubmed: 25248541
JAMA. 2004 Apr 21;291(15):1864-70
pubmed: 15100205
Drugs Aging. 2012 Jun 1;29(6):437-52
pubmed: 22642779
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 1;12(1):99
pubmed: 28764753
Fam Med Community Health. 2021 Nov;9(4):
pubmed: 34794961
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 30;8(7):e021924
pubmed: 30061440
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Jan 4;14(1):4
pubmed: 33397509
Implement Sci. 2016 Jun 02;11(1):79
pubmed: 27255504
CMAJ. 2003 Sep 16;169(6):549-56
pubmed: 12975221
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2004 Dec;2(4):257-64
pubmed: 15903284
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Nov 07;167(9):609-617
pubmed: 29052691
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 07;(10):CD008165
pubmed: 25288041
Age Ageing. 2020 Jul 1;49(4):605-614
pubmed: 32484850
Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):37-43
pubmed: 22579043
Drugs Aging. 2017 Dec;34(12):891-905
pubmed: 29196903
Am J Med. 2004 Mar 15;116(6):394-401
pubmed: 15006588
Trials. 2012 Jun 28;13:95
pubmed: 22742939
Can J Cardiol. 2003 Mar 31;19(4):391-6
pubmed: 12704485
Gac Sanit. 2019 Mar - Apr;33(2):106-111
pubmed: 29162290
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Oct 4;8(1):225
pubmed: 36195963
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;74(3):339-347
pubmed: 29196825
BMJ. 2020 Jun 18;369:m1822
pubmed: 32554566
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 03;9:CD008165
pubmed: 30175841
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Nov;26(11):1347-1356
pubmed: 28799226
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(3):610-618
pubmed: 36045192
DICP. 1990 Mar;24(3):321-3
pubmed: 2316239
Drugs Aging. 2009;26(12):1013-28
pubmed: 19929029
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;176:563-7
pubmed: 10974963
Am J Med. 1996 Apr;100(4):428-37
pubmed: 8610730
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 16;16(1):661
pubmed: 27852287
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Jul;56(528):484-5
pubmed: 16834872
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;70(10):1261-7
pubmed: 25128076
Arch Intern Med. 1991 Sep;151(9):1825-32
pubmed: 1888249
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6
pubmed: 18436948
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 12;10(10):e041125
pubmed: 33046478
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Age Ageing. 2013 Jan;42(1):62-9
pubmed: 22910303
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;68(10):1425-33
pubmed: 22447297
Lancet. 2007 Jul 14;370(9582):173-184
pubmed: 17630041
J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 24;8(6):
pubmed: 31238559
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Jul;68(7):e215-e226
pubmed: 35831093
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Feb 5;23(1):25
pubmed: 35123398
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e020106
pubmed: 29362276
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Mar 01;182(3):265-273
pubmed: 35040926
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Aug;107(31-32):543-51
pubmed: 20827352
Implement Sci. 2011 Feb 07;6:10
pubmed: 21299860
Trials. 2022 Jun 9;23(1):479
pubmed: 35681224
Drugs Aging. 2014 Feb;31(2):131-40
pubmed: 24353033
Age Ageing. 2015 Mar;44(2):213-8
pubmed: 25324330
Metabolites. 2021 Mar 30;11(4):
pubmed: 33808080
Drugs Aging. 2003;20(11):817-32
pubmed: 12964888
Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 27;13(1):155
pubmed: 30591069
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 20;20(1):147
pubmed: 32312242
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Jan;65(1):130-3
pubmed: 17578478
Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Jun;13(3):579-583
pubmed: 34676497
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;22(6):549-56
pubmed: 17152121
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jan;22(1):74-81
pubmed: 32893136
Fam Pract. 2017 Feb;34(1):36-42
pubmed: 27605543
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jun;77(6):915-6
pubmed: 24853404
BMJ. 2021 Jul 13;374:n1585
pubmed: 34257088
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Jun 1;60(11):1123-9
pubmed: 12816022
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Drug Saf. 2016 Feb;39(2):109-16
pubmed: 26692396
JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1240-7
pubmed: 16160132
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Feb;31(1):42-51
pubmed: 18163447
PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002148
pubmed: 27755541
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Oct 16;135(8 Pt 2):642-6
pubmed: 11601946
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 01;8:139
pubmed: 24289295
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jun;89(6):845-54
pubmed: 21508941
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;74(10):996-1004
pubmed: 28746708
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Apr;60(4):616-31
pubmed: 22376048
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Feb;65(2):e33-e38
pubmed: 27943247
JAMA. 2015 Nov 3;314(17):1818-31
pubmed: 26529160
Drugs Aging. 2014 Apr;31(4):291-8
pubmed: 24566877
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;88(7):3360-3369
pubmed: 35184324
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016 Jul;9(5):259-68
pubmed: 27625743
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Nov 4;113(44):741-748
pubmed: 27890050
Drugs Aging. 2015 Mar;32(3):189-99
pubmed: 25673123
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Apr;67(4):674-694
pubmed: 30693946
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 May;69(5):543-52
pubmed: 20573091
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017 Feb;16(2):203-213
pubmed: 27885844
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Dec 27;118(51-52):875-882
pubmed: 34939917
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Dec;37(6):1194-205
pubmed: 26297239
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Feb;44(1):15-26
pubmed: 34800255
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2008 Jun;6(2):119-29
pubmed: 18675770
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul;66(6):1206-1212
pubmed: 29461621
Mater Sociomed. 2016 Dec;28(6):432-436
pubmed: 28144194
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7
pubmed: 22618581
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):e031080
pubmed: 31481568
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 06;9:151
pubmed: 25287853
Age Ageing. 2006 Nov;35(6):586-91
pubmed: 16905764
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):762-769
pubmed: 31868920
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Sep 10;8(1):203
pubmed: 36088445
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):230
pubmed: 29017448
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2005 Apr;17(4):123-32
pubmed: 15819637
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):55
pubmed: 31171011
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Nov;87(11):4150-4172
pubmed: 34008195
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;45(10):1045-51
pubmed: 1474400
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Mar 31;15:58
pubmed: 24684851
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 15;10:131
pubmed: 26374231
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Dec;15(12):885-91
pubmed: 24895001
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 25;6(7):e011613
pubmed: 27456328
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jan 25;19(1):24
pubmed: 30683060
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Dec;15(12):892-8
pubmed: 24814043
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061
pubmed: 34593508
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jan;57(1):6-14
pubmed: 14678335
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jun;88(6):2988-2995
pubmed: 34981552
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov;13(6):545-53
pubmed: 26553894
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Oct;65(10):2265-2271
pubmed: 28804870
Drugs Aging. 2013 Apr;30(4):235-46
pubmed: 23408163
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 12;170(7):587-95
pubmed: 20386001
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 07;13:74
pubmed: 25889849
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Mar;47(3):533-43
pubmed: 2316538
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Jun 15;14:1115-1125
pubmed: 29942134
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Sep;62(9):1658-65
pubmed: 25243680
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Mar;18(3):2392-2402
pubmed: 33903064
BMJ Open. 2012 Sep 14;2(5):
pubmed: 22983875
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 24;8(2):e017740
pubmed: 29478012
Age Ageing. 2004 Nov;33(6):612-7
pubmed: 15385274
Fam Pract. 2017 Aug 1;34(4):437-445
pubmed: 28334979
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;85(9):1974-1983
pubmed: 31108564
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Sep;20(9):738-46
pubmed: 21209140
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):564
pubmed: 35799113
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 May;70(5):599-606
pubmed: 24493365
Age Ageing. 2016 Mar;45(2):262-7
pubmed: 26786346
Trials. 2017 Jun 20;18(Suppl 3):280
pubmed: 28681707
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):35
pubmed: 28125977
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Feb;46(2):72-83
pubmed: 18218287
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 11;11:35
pubmed: 26968520
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):181-189
pubmed: 31617562
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 May;55(5):658-65
pubmed: 17493184
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Sep;67(5):874-82
pubmed: 18572295
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012 Mar;30(1):3-9
pubmed: 22175269
Drugs Aging. 2005;22(7):559-69
pubmed: 16038571
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Dec 8-22;163(22):2716-24
pubmed: 14662625
PLoS Med. 2022 Jan 5;19(1):e1003862
pubmed: 34986166
BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e015293
pubmed: 28490560
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Dec;5(4):314-6
pubmed: 18179988
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Dec;55(12):e76-85
pubmed: 20008582
Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 27;12(1):54
pubmed: 28449721
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Nov 23;21(1):659
pubmed: 34814835
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 02;11(6):e0156304
pubmed: 27253380
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jun;54(6):963-8
pubmed: 16776793
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Nov;20(11):1404-1411
pubmed: 31402136
CMAJ. 1997 Feb 1;156(3):385-91
pubmed: 9033421
Drugs Aging. 2015 Nov;32(11):947-55
pubmed: 26446153
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;(5):CD008165
pubmed: 22592727
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jul 28;157(14):1531-6
pubmed: 9236554
J Pers Med. 2022 May 06;12(5):
pubmed: 35629175
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul;82(1):53-63
pubmed: 26922904
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Oct 22;118(42):705-712
pubmed: 34366004
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;70(1):1-11
pubmed: 24019054
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 May 12;12:2042098620918459
pubmed: 32435445
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Jul 22;16:84
pubmed: 26198433
Appl Nurs Res. 2001 Nov;14(4):220-4
pubmed: 11699025
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Aug;58(8):862-8
pubmed: 22893340