Normative Modeling of Brain Morphometry in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.
Journal
JAMA psychiatry
ISSN: 2168-6238
Titre abrégé: JAMA Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589550
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Oct 2023
11 Oct 2023
Historique:
medline:
11
10
2023
pubmed:
11
10
2023
entrez:
11
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The lack of robust neuroanatomical markers of psychosis risk has been traditionally attributed to heterogeneity. A complementary hypothesis is that variation in neuroanatomical measures in individuals at psychosis risk may be nested within the range observed in healthy individuals. To quantify deviations from the normative range of neuroanatomical variation in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) and evaluate their overlap with healthy variation and their association with positive symptoms, cognition, and conversion to a psychotic disorder. This case-control study used clinical-, IQ-, and neuroimaging software (FreeSurfer)-derived regional measures of cortical thickness (CT), cortical surface area (SA), and subcortical volume (SV) from 1340 individuals with CHR-P and 1237 healthy individuals pooled from 29 international sites participating in the Enhancing Neuroimaging Genetics Through Meta-analysis (ENIGMA) Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Working Group. Healthy individuals and individuals with CHR-P were matched on age and sex within each recruitment site. Data were analyzed between September 1, 2021, and November 30, 2022. For each regional morphometric measure, deviation scores were computed as z scores indexing the degree of deviation from their normative means from a healthy reference population. Average deviation scores (ADS) were also calculated for regional CT, SA, and SV measures and globally across all measures. Regression analyses quantified the association of deviation scores with clinical severity and cognition, and 2-proportion z tests identified case-control differences in the proportion of individuals with infranormal (z < -1.96) or supranormal (z > 1.96) scores. Among 1340 individuals with CHR-P, 709 (52.91%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 20.75 (4.74) years. Among 1237 healthy individuals, 684 (55.30%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 22.32 (4.95) years. Individuals with CHR-P and healthy individuals overlapped in the distributions of the observed values, regional z scores, and all ADS values. For any given region, the proportion of individuals with CHR-P who had infranormal or supranormal values was low (up to 153 individuals [<11.42%]) and similar to that of healthy individuals (<115 individuals [<9.30%]). Individuals with CHR-P who converted to a psychotic disorder had a higher percentage of infranormal values in temporal regions compared with those who did not convert (7.01% vs 1.38%) and healthy individuals (5.10% vs 0.89%). In the CHR-P group, only the ADS SA was associated with positive symptoms (β = -0.08; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.02; P = .02 for false discovery rate) and IQ (β = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.15; P = .02 for false discovery rate). In this case-control study, findings suggest that macroscale neuromorphometric measures may not provide an adequate explanation of psychosis risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37819650
pii: 2810624
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3850
pmc: PMC10568447
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Investigateurs
Paul Allen
(P)
Helen Baldwin
(H)
Cali F Bartholomeusz
(CF)
Michael Wl Chee
(MW)
Xiaogang Chen
(X)
Rebecca E Cooper
(RE)
Lieuwe de Haan
(L)
Holly K Hamilton
(HK)
Ying He
(Y)
Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad
(WTV)
Leslie E Horton
(LE)
Daniela Hubl
(D)
Mallory J Klaunig
(MJ)
Alex Koppel
(A)
Yoo Bin Kwak
(YB)
Pablo León-Ortiz
(P)
Rachel L Loewy
(RL)
Patrick McGorry
(P)
Lijun Ouyang
(L)
Paul E Rasser
(PE)
Franz Resch
(F)
Jason Schiffman
(J)
Mikkel E Sørensen
(ME)
Jinsong Tang
(J)
Dennis Velakoulis
(D)
Sophia Vinogradov
(S)
Hidenori Yamasue
(H)
Liu Yuan
(L)
Alison R Yung
(AR)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateOf
Références
Schizophr Bull. 2003;29(4):703-15
pubmed: 14989408
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):970-978
pubmed: 34259821
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 1;79(6):560-570
pubmed: 35476125
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 20;11(1):232
pubmed: 33879764
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Jan;25(1):26-34
pubmed: 23960203
Neuroimage. 2020 Mar;208:116450
pubmed: 31821869
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;28(3):1182-1189
pubmed: 36434057
J Comp Neurol. 1997 Oct 6;386(4):661-80
pubmed: 9378859
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 1;84(9):644-654
pubmed: 29960671
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 1;77(7):755-765
pubmed: 32159746
Psychiatr Q. 1999 Winter;70(4):273-87
pubmed: 10587984
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16480-5
pubmed: 23012402
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;26(7):3512-3523
pubmed: 32963336
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 13;9(1):1900
pubmed: 30760808
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 13;117:110540
pubmed: 35240226
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):753-766
pubmed: 33950164
Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;21(4):585
pubmed: 26283641
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):137-150
pubmed: 35026139
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 26;12(1):297
pubmed: 35882855
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jun 1;42(8):2546-2555
pubmed: 33638594
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;70(1):107-20
pubmed: 23165428
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Jun;25(6):1608-17
pubmed: 24408955
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 1;177(7):589-600
pubmed: 32046535
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005 Nov-Dec;39(11-12):964-71
pubmed: 16343296
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 Sep;1(5):433-447
pubmed: 27642641
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;25(8):1822-1834
pubmed: 29895892
Psychol Assess. 2012 Dec;24(4):801-14
pubmed: 22449035