The sesquiterpene lactone mix: A review of past, present and future aspects.
Asteraceae
Compositae
allergic contact dermatitis
baseline series
patch testing: sesquiterpene lactone mix
Journal
Contact dermatitis
ISSN: 1600-0536
Titre abrégé: Contact Dermatitis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7604950
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
revised:
15
08
2023
received:
05
07
2023
accepted:
06
09
2023
medline:
8
11
2023
pubmed:
12
10
2023
entrez:
11
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The sesquiterpene lactones (SLs) are secondary plant metabolites, which are widespread in the Compositae/Asteraceae plant family. The first SLs were detected more than 100 years ago, and allergic contact dermatitis from Compositae has been reported since the beginning of the 1900s, but it was not until the late 1960s and early 1970s that a collaboration between dermatologists, chemists and botanists led to the detection of SLs as the main allergens of Compositae plants. In the 1980s, the SL mix, consisting of equimolar amounts of alantolactone, costunolide and dehydrocostus lactone, was developed as a screening agent for Compositae sensitisation. Today, after inclusion of SL mix in the baseline series, the mean prevalence of reactions in Europe is around 1%, and in North America 0.8%. In countries outside Europe and North America, the prevalence ranges between 0% and 10.7%. The detection rate of SL mix is lower than that of some plant extracts, and ideally, SL mix should be supplemented with a mix of SLs from locally prevalent allergenic plants. The prevalence of positive reactions to SL mix suggests continued baseline testing in most European countries, North America, New Zealand, Australia and probably some Chinese centres.
Substances chimiques
Allergens
0
Sesquiterpenes
0
Lactones
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
434-441Informations de copyright
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Padilla-Gonzalez GF, Antunes dos Santos F, Batista Da Costa F. Sesquiterpene lactones: more than protective plant compounds with high toxicity. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2016;35(1):18-37.
Chadwick M, Trewin H, Gawthrop F, Wagstaff C. Sesquiterpenoids lactones: benefits to plants and people. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:12780-12805.
Mitchell JC, Dupuis G. Allergic contact dermatitis from sesquiterpenoids of the Compositae family of plants. Br J Dermatol. 1971;84:139-150.
Sülsen VP, Martino VS, eds. Sesquiterpene Lactones. Advances in their Chemistry and Biological Aspects. 1st ed. Springer International Publishing AG; 2018.
Geier J, Hausen BM. Epikutantestung mit dem Kompositen-Mix. Ergebnisse einer Studie der Deutschen Kontaktallergie-Gruppe (DKG) und des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK). Allergologie. 2000;23(7):334-341.
Yoshioka H, Mabry TJ, Timmermann BN. Sesquiterpene lactones. Chemistry, NMR and plant distribution. University of Tokyo Press; 1973.
Lepoittevin J-P, Basketter DA, Goossens A, Karlberg A-T, eds. Allergic contact dermatitis. The molecular basis. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 1998.
English J, Norris P, White I, Cronin E. Variability in the clinical patterns of Compositae dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1989;121(Suppl 34):S27.
Ducombs G, Benezra C, Talaga P, et al. Patch testing with the “sesquiterpene lactone mix”: a marker for contact allergy to Compositae and other sesquiterpene-lactone-containing plants. A multicentre study of the EECDRG. Contact Dermatitis. 1990;22:249-252.
Du P Menagé H, Ross JS, Norris PG, Hawk JLM, White IR. Contact and photocontact sensitization in chronic actinic dermatitis: sesquiterpene lactone mix is an important allergen. Br J Dermatol. 1995;132:543-547.
Chew A-L, Bashir SJ, Hawk JLM, Palmer R, White IR, McFadden JP. Contact and photocontact sensitization in chronic actinic dermatitis: a changing picture. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;62:42-46.
Fall S, Bruze M, Isaksson M, et al. Contact allergy trends in Sweden-a retrospective comparison of patch test data from 1992, 2000, and 2009. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72:297-304.
Fischer NH, Olivier EJ, Fischer HD. The biogenesis and chemistry of sesquiterpene lactones. In: Herz W, Grisebach H, Kirby GW, eds. Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products. Springer-Verlag; 1979.
Knoche H, Ourisson G, Perold GW, Foussereau J, Maleville J. Allergenic component of a liverwort: a sesquiterpene lactone. Science. 1969;166:239-240.
Mitchell JC, Fritig B, Singh B, Towers GHN. Allergic contact dermatitis from Frullania and Compositae. The role of sesquiterpene lactones. J Invest Dermatol. 1970;54(3):233-239.
Mitchell JC, Geissman TA, Dupuis G, Towers GHN. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by Artemisia and Chrysanthemum species. J Invest Dermatol. 1971;56(2):98-101.
Mitchell JC, Roy AK, Dupuis G, Towers GHN. Allergic contact dermatitis from ragweeds (Ambrosia species). Arch Dermatol. 1971;104:73-76.
Foussereau J, Muller JC, Benezra C. Contact allergy to Frullania and Laurus nobilis: cross-sensitization and chemical structure of the allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 1975;1:223-230.
Mitchell JC. Plant dermatitis-note on inadequacy of some plant extracts. Contact Dermatitis Newsletter. 1972;11:271-272.
Benezra C, Epstein WL. Molecular recognition patterns of sesquiterpene lactones in costus-sensitive patients. Contact Dermatitis. 1986;15:223-230.
Baer RL. Cross-sensitization phenomena. In: MacKenna RMB, ed. Modern Trends in Dermatology. Second Series. Butterworth; 1954.
Roed-Petersen J, Hjorth N. Compositae sensitivity among patients with contact dermatitis. Value of Compositae oleoresins in a standard test series. Contact Dermatitis. 1976;2:271-281.
Ross JS, du Peloux Menagé H, Hawk JLM, White IR. Sesquiterpene lactone contact sensitivity: clinical patterns of Compositae dermatitis and relationship to chronic actinic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1993;29:84-87.
du P Menagé H, Hawk JLM, White IR. Sesquiterpene lactone mix contact sensitivity and its relationship to chronic actinic dermatitis: a follow-up study. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;39:119-122.
von der Werth JM, Ratcliffe J, English JSC. Compositae mix is a more sensitive test for Compositae dermatitis than the sesquiterpene lactone mix. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:273-276.
Wilkinson SM, Pollock B. Patch test sensitization after use of the Compositae mix. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:277-278.
Paulsen E, Andersen KE, Brandão FM, et al. Routine patch testing with the sesquiterpene lactone mix in Europe: a 2-year experience. A multicentre study of the EECDRG. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:72-76.
Paulsen E, Andersen KE, Hausen BM. An 8-year experience with routine SL mix patch testing supplemented with Compositae mix in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45:29-35.
Britton JER, Wilkinson SM, English JSC, et al. The British standard series of contact dermatitis allergens: validation in clinical practice and value for clinical governance. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(2):259-264.
Machovcova A, Dastychova E, Kostalova D, et al. Common contact sensitizers in The Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53:162-166.
Bruynzeel DP, Diepgen TL, Andersen KE, et al. Monitoring the European standard series in 10 centres 1996-2000. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53:146-149.
Uter W, Hegewald J, Aberer W, et al. The European standard series in 9 European countries, 2002/2003-first results of the European surveillance system on contact allergies. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53:136-145.
Cabanillas M, Fernández-Redondo V, Toribio J. Allergic contact dermatitis to plants in a Spanish dermatology department: a 7-year review. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55:84-91.
Hegewald J, Uter W, Aberer W, et al. The European surveillance system of contact allergies (ESSCA): results of patch testing the standard series, 2004. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:174-181.
Rathour Hansen S, Kroon S. Standard patch testing and nickel allergy in Stavanger, Norway. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen. 2008;128:433-435.
Uter W, Rämsch C, Aberer W, et al. The European baseline series in 10 European countries, 2005/2006-results of the European surveillance system on contact allergies (ESSCA). Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61:31-38.
Helsing P, Gjersvik P, Holm J-Ø, et al. Variability in patch test reactions-first report from the Norwegian patch test registry. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;62:309-313.
Beliauskiene A, Valiukeviciene S, Uter W, Schnuch A. The European baseline series in Lithuania: results of patch testing in consecutive adult patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25:59-63.
García-Gavín J, Armario-Hita JC, Fernández-Redondo V, et al. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Spain. Results of the Spanish surveillance system on contact allergies for the year 2008. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2011;102:98-105.
Isaksson M, Hansson C, Inerot A, et al. Multicentre patch testing with Compositae mix by the Swedish contact dermatitis research group. Acta Derm Venereol. 2011;91:295-298.
Paulsen E, Andersen KE. Screening for Compositae sensitization with pure allergens: implications of molecular structure, strength of reaction, and time of testing. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64:96-103.
Aigular-Bernier M, Bernal-Ruiz AI, Rivas-Ruiz F, Fernández-Morano MT, de Troya-Martín M. Contact sensitization to allergens in the Spanish standard series at hospital Costa del Sol in Marbella, Spain: a retrospective study (2005-2010). Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2012;103(3):223-228.
Wilkinson M, Gallo R, Goossens A, et al. A proposal to create an extension to the European baseline series. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;78:101-108.
Uter W, Amario-Hita JC, Balato A, et al. European surveillance system on contact allergies: results with the European baseline series, 2013/14. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(9):1516-1525.
Paulsen E, Andersen KE. Screening for Compositae contact sensitization with sesquiterpene lactones and Compositae mix 2.5% pet. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81:368-373.
Uter W, Bauer A, Belloni Fortina A, et al. Patch test results with the European baseline series and additions thereof in the ESSCA network, 2015-2018. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(2):109-120.
Dugonik A, Dugonik B, Podgorelec V, Brezočnik L. Associated positive patch test reactions to standard contact allergens: 10-year data from the Slovenian E-surveillance system. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;85:17-25.
Andernord D, Bruze M, Bryngelsson I-L, et al. Contact allergy to haptens in the Swedish baseline series: results from the Swedish patch test register (2010 to 2017). Contact Dermatitis. 2022;86:175-188.
Uter W, Wilkinson SM, Aerts O, et al. European patch test results with audit allergens as candidates for inclusion in the European baseline series, 2019/20: joint results of the ESSCA and the EBS working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;86:379-389.
Uter W, Wilkinson SM, Aerts O, et al. Patch test results with the European baseline series. 2019/20-joint European results of the ESSCA and the EBS working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87:343-355.
Bizjak M, Adamič K, Bajrovič N, et al. Patch testing with the European baseline series and 10 added allergens: single-centre study of 748 patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87:439-446.
Marks JG Jr, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38:911-918.
Marks JG Jr, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1996-1998. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136(2):272-273.
Marks JG Jr, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998-2000. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 2003;14(2):59-62.
Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis. 2004;15(4):176-183.
Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2003-2004 study period. Dermatitis. 2008;19(3):129-136.
Davis MDP, Scalf LA, Yiannias JA, et al. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a Mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2005. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:67-72.
Zug KA, Warshaw EM, Fowler JF Jr, et al. Patch-test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006. Dermatitis. 2009;20(3):149-160.
Fransway AF, Zug KA, Belsito DV, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008. Dermatitis. 2013;24(1):10-21.
Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, Taylor JS, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2009-2010. Dermatitis. 2013;24(2):50-59.
Warshaw EM, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2011-2012. Dermatitis. 2015;26(1):49-59.
Gosnell AL, Schmotzer B, Nedorost ST. Polysensitization and individual susceptibility to allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2015;26:133-136.
DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results 2013-2014. Dermatitis. 2017;28(1):33-46.
DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Zug KA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2015-2016. Dermatitis. 2018;29(6):297-309.
DeKoven JG, Silverberg JI, Warshaw EM, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2017-2018. Dermatitis. 2021;32(2):111-123.
DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Reeder MJ, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2019-2020. Dermatitis. 2023;34:90-104.
Tan E, Leow YH, Ng SK, Goh CL. A study of the sensitization rate to sesquiterpene lactone mix in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;41(2):80-83.
Nadeem M, Akbar T, Haroon TS. Patch testing with European standard series our experience at Mayo Hospital, Lahore. J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2001;11:7-12.
Lazarov A. European standard series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55:73-76.
Mak RKH, White IR, White JML, McFadden JP, Goon AJT. Lower incidence of sesquiterpene lactone sensitivity in a population in Asia versus a population in Europe: an effect of chrysanthemum tea? Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57:163-164.
Lam WS, Chan LY, Ho SCK, Chong LY, So WH, Wong TW. A retrospective study of 2585 patients patch tested with the European standard series in Hong Kong (1995-99). Int J Dermatol. 2008;47:128-133.
Bilcha KD, Ayele A, Shibeshi D, Lovell C. Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia-results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;63:140-145.
Cheng S, Cao M, Zhang Y, et al. Time trends of contact allergy to a modified European baseline series in Beijing between 2001 and 2006. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(1):22-27.
Boonchai W, Iamtharachai P. Risk factors for common contact allergens and patch test results using a modified European baseline series in patients tested between 2000 and 2009 at Siriraj hospital. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2014;32:60-65.
Erfan G, Yanık ME, Kaya Ş, Kalaycı S, Taşolar K, Kulaç M. Patch testing for allergic contact dermatitis: three years retrospective results in Tekirdağ. Turkderm Turk Arch Dermatol Venereol. 2015;49:129-133.
Toholka R, Wang Y-S, Tate B, et al. The first Australian baseline series: recommendations for patch testing in suspected contact dermatitis. Australas J Dermatol. 2015;56:107-115.
Murphy VL, Patel DC, Lamb SR, Cheng HS. Patch testing to plants: sensitization associated with exposure to plants, essential oils and botanicals in cosmetics. N Zeal Med J. 2021;134:86-99.
Boyvat A, Yildizhan IK. Patch test results of the European baseline series among 1309 patients in Turkey between 2013 and 2019. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84:15-23.
Wee C, Tan CH, Zhao X, Yew YW, Goon A. Pattern of contact sensitization in patients with and without atopic dermatitis in an Asian dermatology center. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;86:398-403.
Diepgen TL, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174:319-329.
Uter W, Aberer W, Armario-Hita JC, et al. Current patch test results with the European baseline series and extensions to it from the “European surveillance system on contact allergy” network, 2007-2008. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67:9-19.
Hausen BM, Vieluf IK. AllergiePflanzen-Pflanzenallergene: Handbuch und Atlas der allergie-induzierenden Wild-and Kulturpflanzen. 2nd ed. Landsberg/München, ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft mbH; 1997.
Hausen BM, Oestmann G. Untersuchungen über die Häufigkeit berufsbedingter allergischer Hauterkrankungen auf einem Blumengrossmarkt. Derm Beruf Umwelt. 1988;36(4):117-124.
Welz AN, Emberger-Klein A, Menrad K. The importance of herbal medicine use in the German health-care system: prevalence, usage pattern, and influencing factors. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:952. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4739-0
Herman A, Aerts O, Baeck M, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in FreeStyle® libre, a newly introduced glucose sensor. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77(6):367-373.
Herman A, Mowitz M, Aerts O, et al. Unexpected positive patch test reactions to sesquiterpene lactones in patients sensitized to the glucose sensor FreeStyle libre. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81:354-367.
Ahrensbøll-Friis U, Simonsen AB, Zachariae C, Thyssen JP, Johansen JD. Contact dermatitis caused by glucose sensors, insulin pumps, and tapes: results from a 5-year period. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84:75-81.
Dendooven E, Dirinck E, Foubert K, Aerts O. “Re-testing” suggests that cosensitizations to isobornyl acrylate and sesquiterpene lactones may be due to cross-reactivity. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;86(1):57-59.
Bruze M, Condé-Salazar L, Goossens A, Kanerva L, White IR. Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. On behalf of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;41:241-250.
Hausen BM. A 6-year experience with Compositae mix. Am J Contact Dermat. 1996;7(2):94-99.
Sharma VK, Chakrabarti A. Common contact sensitizers in Chandigarh, India. A study of 200 patients with the European standard series. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;38:127-131.
Schnuch A, Szliska C, Uter W. Allergisches Gesichtsekzem. Auswertungen Des IVDK Und Literaturübersicht. Hautarzt. 2009;60:13-21.
Jacob M, Brinkmann J, Schmidt TJ. Sesquiterpene lactone mix as a diagnostic tool for Asteraceae allergic contact dermatitis: chemical explanation for its poor performance and Sesquiterpene lactone mix II as a proposed improvement. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(5):233-240.
Warshaw EM, Nelsen DD, Sasseville D, et al. Positivity ratio and reaction index: patch-test quality-control metrics applied to the North American Contact Dermatitis Group database. Dermatitis. 2010;21:91-97.
Wilkinson SM, Gonçalo M, Aerts O, et al. The European baseline series and recommended additions: 2023. Contact Dermatitis. 2023;88:87-92.
Bauer A, Geier J, Schreiber S, Schubert S, For the IVDK. Contact sensitization to plants of the Compositae family: data of the information network of departments of dermatology (IVDK) from 2007 to 2016. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80(4):222-227.