Learning from the universal, proactive outreach of the Brazilian Community Health Worker model: impact of a Community Health and Wellbeing Worker initiative on vaccination, cancer screening and NHS health check uptake in a deprived community in the UK.


Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 18 04 2023
accepted: 28 09 2023
medline: 13 10 2023
pubmed: 12 10 2023
entrez: 11 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Delays in preventative service uptake are increasing in the UK. Universal, comprehensive monthly outreach by Community Health and Wellbeing Workers (CHW), who are integrated at the GP practice and local authority, offer a promising alternative to general public health campaigns as it personalises health promotion and prevention of disease holistically at the household level. We sought to test the ability of this model, which is based on the Brazilian Family Health Strategy, to increase prevention uptake in the UK. Analysis of primary care patient records for 662 households that were allocated to five CHWWs from July 2021. Primary outcome was the Composite Referral Completion Indicator (CRCI), a measure of how many health promotion activities were received by members of a household relative to the ones that they were eligible for during the period July 2021-April 2022. The CRCI was compared between the intervention group (those who had received at least one visit) and the control group (allocated households that were yet to receive a visit). A secondary outcome was the number of GP visits in the intervention and control groups during the study period and compared to a year prior. Intervention and control groups were largely comparable in terms of household occupancy and service eligibilities. A total of 2251 patients in 662 corresponding households were allocated to 5 CHWs and 160 households had received at least one visit during the intervention period. The remaining households were included in the control group. Overall service uptake was 40% higher in the intervention group compared to control group (CRCI: 0.21 ± 0.15 and 0.15 ± 0.19 respectively). Likelihood of immunisation uptake specifically was 47% higher and cancer screening and NHS Health Checks was 82% higher. The average number of GP consultations per household decreased by 7.4% in the intervention group over the first 10 months of the pilot compared to the 10 months preceding its start, compared with a 0.6% decrease in the control group. Despite the short study period these are promising findings in this deprived, traditionally hard to reach community and demonstrates potential for the Brazilian community health worker model to be impactful in the UK. Further analysis is needed to examine if this approach can reduce health inequalities and increase cost effectiveness of health promotion approaches.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Delays in preventative service uptake are increasing in the UK. Universal, comprehensive monthly outreach by Community Health and Wellbeing Workers (CHW), who are integrated at the GP practice and local authority, offer a promising alternative to general public health campaigns as it personalises health promotion and prevention of disease holistically at the household level. We sought to test the ability of this model, which is based on the Brazilian Family Health Strategy, to increase prevention uptake in the UK.
METHODS METHODS
Analysis of primary care patient records for 662 households that were allocated to five CHWWs from July 2021. Primary outcome was the Composite Referral Completion Indicator (CRCI), a measure of how many health promotion activities were received by members of a household relative to the ones that they were eligible for during the period July 2021-April 2022. The CRCI was compared between the intervention group (those who had received at least one visit) and the control group (allocated households that were yet to receive a visit). A secondary outcome was the number of GP visits in the intervention and control groups during the study period and compared to a year prior.
RESULTS RESULTS
Intervention and control groups were largely comparable in terms of household occupancy and service eligibilities. A total of 2251 patients in 662 corresponding households were allocated to 5 CHWs and 160 households had received at least one visit during the intervention period. The remaining households were included in the control group. Overall service uptake was 40% higher in the intervention group compared to control group (CRCI: 0.21 ± 0.15 and 0.15 ± 0.19 respectively). Likelihood of immunisation uptake specifically was 47% higher and cancer screening and NHS Health Checks was 82% higher. The average number of GP consultations per household decreased by 7.4% in the intervention group over the first 10 months of the pilot compared to the 10 months preceding its start, compared with a 0.6% decrease in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Despite the short study period these are promising findings in this deprived, traditionally hard to reach community and demonstrates potential for the Brazilian community health worker model to be impactful in the UK. Further analysis is needed to examine if this approach can reduce health inequalities and increase cost effectiveness of health promotion approaches.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37821938
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10084-8
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-10084-8
pmc: PMC10568890
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1092

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

Global Health. 2013 Jun 11;9:25
pubmed: 23764067
BMJ. 2022 Dec 16;379:o3028
pubmed: 36526297
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Jan;71(1):87-97
pubmed: 27535769
J R Soc Med. 2018 Dec;111(12):453-461
pubmed: 30286301
Work. 2022;72(3):1047-1054
pubmed: 35599521
BMJ. 2014 Jul 03;349:g4014
pubmed: 24994807
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Dec;2:603-612
pubmed: 28018959
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jan 01;11(1):49-58
pubmed: 34060275
Rev Saude Publica. 2020 Dec 11;54:143
pubmed: 33331421
Sci Adv. 2022 Apr 29;8(17):eabm9825
pubmed: 35476432
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1173-1175
pubmed: 32220277
Trials. 2015 Mar 21;16:107
pubmed: 25872945
Int J Infect Dis. 2016 Feb;43:103-110
pubmed: 26751238
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 13;18(1):869
pubmed: 30005611
J Med Virol. 2023 Jan;95(1):e28401
pubmed: 36512325
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jul 01;7(10):943-954
pubmed: 30316247
Br J Nurs. 2022 May 26;31(10):S14-S24
pubmed: 35648663
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(12):2199-203
pubmed: 22021280
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;22(4):453
pubmed: 35338872
J Med Screen. 2016 Jun;23(2):98-103
pubmed: 26377810
London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2012;4(2):126-32
pubmed: 26265950
Lancet. 2020 Sep 26;396(10255):898-908
pubmed: 32919524
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):405
pubmed: 35220973
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2177-81
pubmed: 26039598
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;21(1):513
pubmed: 33726716
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 21;20(1):93
pubmed: 31964366
Br J Cancer. 2022 Sep;127(5):863-871
pubmed: 35661833
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Jun 21;11:33
pubmed: 22720869
BMJ. 2022 Sep 29;378:e070344
pubmed: 36175020
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693
pubmed: 32094110
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Jan;60(1):13-9
pubmed: 16361449
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Aug;74(8):617-619
pubmed: 32385125

Auteurs

Cornelia Junghans (C)

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 3Rd Floor Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.

Grazia Antonacci (G)

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 3Rd Floor Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Centre for Health Economics and Policy Innovation (CHEPI), Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Alison Williams (A)

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 3Rd Floor Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK.

Matthew Harris (M)

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 3Rd Floor Reynolds Building, St Dunstan's Road, London, W6 8RP, UK. m.harris@imperial.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH