Heritability of dental arches and occlusal characteristics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

dental arch dental occlusion genetics heritability malocclusion siblings twins

Journal

European journal of orthodontics
ISSN: 1460-2210
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909010

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Nov 2023
Historique:
medline: 1 12 2023
pubmed: 12 10 2023
entrez: 11 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The genetic basis of dentoalveolar characteristics has been investigated by several studies, however, the findings are equivocal. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the heritability of dental arches and occlusal parameters in different stages of human dentition. Electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Dentistry and Oral Science Source were searched up to August 2023 without the restriction of language or publication date. Empirical studies investigating the heritability of dentoalveolar parameters among twins and siblings were included in the review. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently and in duplicate by two authors and a third author resolved conflicts if needed. Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias among studies and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Twenty-eight studies were included in the systematic review, of which 15 studies reporting heritability coefficients in the permanent dentition stages were deemed suitable for the meta-analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses showed high heritability estimates for maxillary intermolar width (0.52), maxillary intercanine width (0.54), mandibular intermolar width (0.55), mandibular intercanine width (0.55), maxillary arch length (0.76), mandibular arch length (0.57), and palatal depth (0.56). The heritability estimates for the occlusal parameters varied considerably, with relatively moderate values for crossbite (0.46) and overbite (0.44) and low values for buccal segment relationship (0.32), overjet (0.22), and rotation and displacement of teeth (0.16). However, the certainty of evidence for most of the outcomes was low according to the GRADE criteria. Based on the available evidence, it can be concluded that the dental arch dimensions have a high heritability while the occlusal parameters demonstrate a moderate to low heritability. PROSPERO (CRD42022358442).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The genetic basis of dentoalveolar characteristics has been investigated by several studies, however, the findings are equivocal. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the heritability of dental arches and occlusal parameters in different stages of human dentition.
SEARCH METHODS METHODS
Electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Dentistry and Oral Science Source were searched up to August 2023 without the restriction of language or publication date.
SELECTION CRITERIA METHODS
Empirical studies investigating the heritability of dentoalveolar parameters among twins and siblings were included in the review.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS METHODS
Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently and in duplicate by two authors and a third author resolved conflicts if needed. Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias among studies and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty-eight studies were included in the systematic review, of which 15 studies reporting heritability coefficients in the permanent dentition stages were deemed suitable for the meta-analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses showed high heritability estimates for maxillary intermolar width (0.52), maxillary intercanine width (0.54), mandibular intermolar width (0.55), mandibular intercanine width (0.55), maxillary arch length (0.76), mandibular arch length (0.57), and palatal depth (0.56). The heritability estimates for the occlusal parameters varied considerably, with relatively moderate values for crossbite (0.46) and overbite (0.44) and low values for buccal segment relationship (0.32), overjet (0.22), and rotation and displacement of teeth (0.16). However, the certainty of evidence for most of the outcomes was low according to the GRADE criteria.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Based on the available evidence, it can be concluded that the dental arch dimensions have a high heritability while the occlusal parameters demonstrate a moderate to low heritability.
REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
PROSPERO (CRD42022358442).

Identifiants

pubmed: 37822010
pii: 7308468
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjad061
pmc: PMC10687511
doi:

Types de publication

Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

854-867

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society.

Références

Prog Orthod. 2020 Dec 7;21(1):44
pubmed: 33283252
Arch Oral Biol. 2020 Jul;115:104740
pubmed: 32417704
Eye (Lond). 2022 Apr;36(4):673-675
pubmed: 34987196
Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Apr;9(4):255-66
pubmed: 18319743
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Aug;104(2):121-31
pubmed: 8338064
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1992 Jan-Mar;12(1):33-40
pubmed: 1572939
Res Synth Methods. 2022 May;13(3):363-367
pubmed: 35088937
World J Orthod. 2007 Winter;8(4):405-10
pubmed: 18092526
Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):812-3
pubmed: 27636569
Angle Orthod. 1998 Oct;68(5):445-54
pubmed: 9770103
Am J Orthod. 1973 May;63(5):471-80
pubmed: 4512074
Med Arch. 2019 Jun;73(3):205-208
pubmed: 31402805
Chin J Dent Res. 1998 Dec;1(3):12-6
pubmed: 10557166
Stomatologija. 2015;17(1):3-8
pubmed: 26183851
Addiction. 2003 Jan;98(1):23-31
pubmed: 12492752
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Oct;38(5):493-502
pubmed: 26503948
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Environ Int. 2018 Dec;121(Pt 1):1027-1031
pubmed: 30166065
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Jan;103(1):33-8
pubmed: 8422028
Aust Dent J. 2005 Jun;50(2):95-100
pubmed: 16050088
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Dec;148(6):922-38
pubmed: 26672698
Br J Orthod. 1999 Sep;26(3):195-203
pubmed: 10532158
J Indian Dent Assoc. 1986 Mar;58(3):99-102
pubmed: 3458831
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Nov;162(5):704-713
pubmed: 36137854
J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Jan;42(1):49-56
pubmed: 25196049
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 06;6(1):245
pubmed: 29208034
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Mar 1;46(2):160-170
pubmed: 35533222
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;100:103-110
pubmed: 29339215
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Sep;9(Suppl 2):S314-S317
pubmed: 30294164
Nat Genet. 2015 Jul;47(7):702-9
pubmed: 25985137
Arch Oral Biol. 2001 Sep;46(9):857-64
pubmed: 11420058
Arch Oral Biol. 1990;35(12):983-9
pubmed: 2076064
Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Feb;14(2):139-49
pubmed: 23329114
Angle Orthod. 1987 Jul;57(3):219-33
pubmed: 3477969
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Oct;25(10):855-869
pubmed: 34312064
Eur J Orthod. 1984 May;6(2):77-91
pubmed: 6587973
Nat Genet. 1997 Dec;17(4):387-92
pubmed: 9398838
Prog Orthod. 2020 Aug 31;21(1):29
pubmed: 32864724
Arch Oral Biol. 2009 Dec;54 Suppl 1:S45-51
pubmed: 18715551
J Forensic Sci. 2022 Nov;67(6):2334-2342
pubmed: 35883264
Acta Stomatol Croat. 1991;25(1):25-31
pubmed: 1819924
Aust Orthod J. 1988 Oct;10(4):231-5
pubmed: 3273149
Arch Oral Biol. 2009 Dec;54 Suppl 1:S3-17
pubmed: 19913215
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906
pubmed: 33789826
Am J Orthod. 1980 Aug;78(2):140-54
pubmed: 6931485
Arch Oral Biol. 2004 Dec;49(12):1015-24
pubmed: 15485644
J Dent Res. 1988 Sep;67(9):1150-5
pubmed: 3165997
Eur J Orthod. 1986 May;8(2):91-7
pubmed: 3459665
Br J Orthod. 1986 Jan;13(1):1-11
pubmed: 3510662
Am J Orthod. 1980 Aug;78(2):155-63
pubmed: 6931486
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Mar;99(3):258-68
pubmed: 1998301
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1981;1(2):217-27
pubmed: 7200099
Int Orthod. 2021 Mar;19(1):82-87
pubmed: 33516649
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120

Auteurs

Jamal Giri (J)

Adelaide Dental School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Michelle Bockmann (M)

Adelaide Dental School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Alan Brook (A)

Adelaide Dental School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Taseef Hasan Farook (TH)

Adelaide Dental School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Maurice Meade (M)

Adelaide Dental School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Toby Hughes (T)

Adelaide Dental School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH