Waste management developments in the last five decades: Asian perspective.
Asian perspective
five decades
solid waste management
sustainable development
technologies
waste management issues and challenges
Journal
Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA
ISSN: 1096-3669
Titre abrégé: Waste Manag Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9881064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
4
12
2023
pubmed:
12
10
2023
entrez:
12
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Solid waste management was explored in Asia's last five decades, and the issues and challenges were identified. Waste generation has increased in all nations in the previous 50 years, although more recently, a declining trend has been observed in Japan and Korea. The composition has been predominantly organic, with 45-50% being kitchen waste. Material extraction and productivity to sustain the most populous part of the globe are explained. Waste management technologies have evolved, with more nations slowly transitioning from landfills to using waste-to-energy options. However, landfilling and open dumps are still the major disposal choice in most developing countries in Asia. Thus, the issues of concern include dumpsites management, the informal sector, waste collection, open burning and food waste. Changes (increasing trends) in the recycling technologies and quantum are evident, as seen in several country reports from India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand and Vietnam. There are several issues and challenges for recycling, which are explored in the text. Lastly, the drivers that propel the whole scenario of waste management in Asia and the evolution of these drivers over time are discussed. Several recommendations are included to achieve sustainable waste management in Asia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37823520
doi: 10.1177/0734242X231199938
pmc: PMC10693742
doi:
Substances chimiques
Solid Waste
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1699-1716Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Mar;41(3):585-593
pubmed: 36218228
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Nov 1;897:165405
pubmed: 37429472
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Mar;72(3):237-243
pubmed: 29222091
Waste Manag. 2009 Apr;29(4):1449-58
pubmed: 19070474
J Clean Prod. 2021 Feb 15;284:124775
pubmed: 33106733
Waste Manag. 2012 Nov;32(11):2126-33
pubmed: 22330265
Waste Manag. 2018 Apr;74:43-51
pubmed: 29352634
Waste Manag. 2017 May;63:393-396
pubmed: 28153408
Sci Total Environ. 2022 May 10;820:153274
pubmed: 35074380
Waste Manag. 2013 Jan;33(1):220-32
pubmed: 23098815
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Oct;27(7):625-33
pubmed: 19470545
Waste Manag Res. 2020 Oct;38(10):1075-1077
pubmed: 33043873
Waste Manag. 2009 Feb;29(2):915-23
pubmed: 18657963
Waste Manag. 2013 Nov;33(11):2509-19
pubmed: 23886489
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Aug 19;48(16):9523-30
pubmed: 25019173
Waste Manag. 2016 Dec;58:415-429
pubmed: 27220609
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Jul;4(7):e452
pubmed: 27340002
Waste Manag. 2021 Apr 1;124:118-127
pubmed: 33611156
Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Apr 15;37(8):1493-502
pubmed: 12731829
J Environ Manage. 2012 Jul 30;103:9-14
pubmed: 22459066
Waste Manag. 2017 Mar;61:593-607
pubmed: 28038906
Waste Manag Res. 2007 Jun;25(3):198-207
pubmed: 17612318
Waste Manag. 2012 Nov;32(11):2018-28
pubmed: 22770806