Measuring the financial impact of disabilities in India (an analysis of national sample survey data).


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 13 03 2023
accepted: 25 09 2023
medline: 23 10 2023
pubmed: 12 10 2023
entrez: 12 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

People with disabilities are vulnerable because of the many challenges they face attitudinal, physical, and financial. The National Policy for Persons with Disabilities (2006) recognizes that Persons with Disabilities are valuable human resources for the country and seeks to create an environment that provides equal opportunities, and protection of their rights, and full. There are limited studies on health care burden due to disabilities of various types. The present study examines the socioeconomic and state-wise differences in the prevalence of disabilities and related household financial burden in India. Data for this study was obtained from the National Sample Survey (NSS), 76th round Persons with Disabilities in India Survey 2018. The survey covered a sample of 1,18,152 households, 5,76,569 individuals, of which 1,06,894 of had any disability. This study performed descriptive statistics, and bivariate estimates. The finding of the analysis showed that prevalence of disability of any kind was 22 persons per 1000. Around, one-fifth (20.32%) of the household's monthly consumption expenditure was spent on out-of-pocket expenditure for disability. More than half (57.1%) of the households were pushed to catastrophic health expenditure due to one of the members being disabled. Almost one-fifth (19.1%) of the households who were above the poverty line before one of members was treated for disability were pushed below the poverty line after the expenditure of the treatment and average percentage shortfall in income from the poverty line was 11.0 percent due to disability treatment care expenditure. The study provides an insight on the socioeconomic differentials in out-of-pocket expenditure, catastrophic expenditure for treatment of any kind of disability. To attain SDG goal 3 that advocates healthy life and promote well-being for all at all ages, there is a need to recognize the disadvantaged and due to disability.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
People with disabilities are vulnerable because of the many challenges they face attitudinal, physical, and financial. The National Policy for Persons with Disabilities (2006) recognizes that Persons with Disabilities are valuable human resources for the country and seeks to create an environment that provides equal opportunities, and protection of their rights, and full. There are limited studies on health care burden due to disabilities of various types.
AIM
The present study examines the socioeconomic and state-wise differences in the prevalence of disabilities and related household financial burden in India.
METHODS
Data for this study was obtained from the National Sample Survey (NSS), 76th round Persons with Disabilities in India Survey 2018. The survey covered a sample of 1,18,152 households, 5,76,569 individuals, of which 1,06,894 of had any disability. This study performed descriptive statistics, and bivariate estimates.
RESULTS
The finding of the analysis showed that prevalence of disability of any kind was 22 persons per 1000. Around, one-fifth (20.32%) of the household's monthly consumption expenditure was spent on out-of-pocket expenditure for disability. More than half (57.1%) of the households were pushed to catastrophic health expenditure due to one of the members being disabled. Almost one-fifth (19.1%) of the households who were above the poverty line before one of members was treated for disability were pushed below the poverty line after the expenditure of the treatment and average percentage shortfall in income from the poverty line was 11.0 percent due to disability treatment care expenditure.
CONCLUSION
The study provides an insight on the socioeconomic differentials in out-of-pocket expenditure, catastrophic expenditure for treatment of any kind of disability. To attain SDG goal 3 that advocates healthy life and promote well-being for all at all ages, there is a need to recognize the disadvantaged and due to disability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37824482
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292592
pii: PONE-D-23-06124
pmc: PMC10569625
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0292592

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Yadav et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist

Références

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 26;13(2):e0193320
pubmed: 29481563
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(6):393-405
pubmed: 21043541
J Environ Health. 2010 Jan-Feb;72(6):8-11; quiz 66
pubmed: 20104827
J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Apr;46(4):398-412
pubmed: 15076658
BMJ Open. 2018 May 31;8(5):e018020
pubmed: 29858403
Popul Health Manag. 2011 Apr;14(2):93-8
pubmed: 21091370
Behav Modif. 2008 Sep;32(5):622-37
pubmed: 18362201
Health Econ. 2007 Nov;16(11):1159-84
pubmed: 17311356
J Safety Res. 2018 Dec;67:57-63
pubmed: 30553430
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;42(12):1415-23
pubmed: 14627876
Natl Med J India. 2017 May-Jun;30(3):125-130
pubmed: 28936995
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):w467-78
pubmed: 19336470
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Nov 1;113(11):661-669
pubmed: 31294808
J Forensic Leg Med. 2007 Oct;14(7):410-5
pubmed: 17720592
Health Econ. 2003 Nov;12(11):921-34
pubmed: 14601155
Acta Paediatr. 2019 Apr;108(4):731-739
pubmed: 30252948
J Safety Res. 2022 Sep;82:283-292
pubmed: 36031256
JAMA. 2001 Jan 3;285(1):60-6
pubmed: 11150110
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Jun 1;33(5):699-701
pubmed: 29617995
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Sep;90(9):1532-40
pubmed: 19735781
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Sep;19(5):769-782
pubmed: 33615417
Disabil Health J. 2011 Jan;4(1):12-8
pubmed: 21168802
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 13;10(8):e0135051
pubmed: 26270049
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Jul-Sep;26(3):e151-68
pubmed: 20583316
Health Econ Rev. 2017 Sep 18;7(1):31
pubmed: 28921477
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0158332
pubmed: 27391322
Indian J Psychiatry. 2017 Jan-Mar;59(1):17-20
pubmed: 28529356
Indian J Tuberc. 2019 Oct;66(4):448-460
pubmed: 31813431

Auteurs

Jeetendra Yadav (J)

ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics (NIMS), New Delhi, India.

Niharika Tripathi (N)

Department of Sociology, Indraprastha College for Women, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.

Geetha R Menon (GR)

ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics (NIMS), New Delhi, India.

Saritha Nair (S)

ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics (NIMS), New Delhi, India.

Jitenkumar Singh (J)

ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics (NIMS), New Delhi, India.

Ravinder Singh (R)

Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India.

M Vishnu Vardhana Rao (MVV)

ICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics (NIMS), New Delhi, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH