Measurement properties of cervical joint position error in people with and without chronic neck pain.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
07
06
2023
accepted:
28
09
2023
medline:
1
11
2023
pubmed:
12
10
2023
entrez:
12
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
People with chronic neck pain (CNP) often present with impaired neck proprioception. The most widely used clinical test for assessing neck proprioception is cervical joint position sense which measures joint position error (JPE). This clinical test is typically performed using a laser pointer to examine the accuracy of returning to a neutral head position (NHP) or target head position (THP) following active neck movements. The aim of this study was to determine the measurement properties of JPE using a laser pointer when tested in people with and without CNP under a variety of different testing conditions (i.e., different movement directions, sitting versus standing, NHP versus THP). Forty-three participants (23 asymptomatic and 20 with CNP) underwent neck proprioception testing, returning to a NHP and THP in both sitting and standing positions (six trials for each test). A laser pointer was secured on the participant's forehead and inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors were placed beneath the laser pointer and at the level of the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra. Both the absolute and the constant JPE were assessed. For the asymptomatic participants, good reliability (ICC: 0.79) was found only for right rotation of the THP task in sitting. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found in flexion for the THP task. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found for right rotation of the THP for the absolute JPE and left rotation (ICC: 0.85) for the constant error of the NHP task. In those with CNP, when tested in sitting, good reliability was found for flexion (ICC: 0.8) for the absolute JPE and good reliability (ICC range: 0.8-0.84) was found for flexion, extension, and right rotation for the constant JPE. In standing, good reliability (ICC range: 0.81-0.88) was found for flexion, and rotation for the absolute JPE. The constant JPE showed good reliability (ICC: 0.85) for right rotation and excellent reliability (ICC: 0.93) for flexion. Validity was weak to strong (r range: 0.26-0.83) and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.47-0.93) for absolute and constant error respectively, when tested in sitting. In standing, the validity was weak to very strong (0.38-0.96) for the absolute JPE and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.54-0.92) for the constant JPE. The reliability of the measure of JPE when tested in sitting and standing in both groups showed good reliability, but not for all movements. The results of the current study also showed that the laser pointer correlated well with the Noraxon IMUs, but not for all movements. The results of the current study support the use of the JPE using a laser pointer in clinical and research settings.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
People with chronic neck pain (CNP) often present with impaired neck proprioception. The most widely used clinical test for assessing neck proprioception is cervical joint position sense which measures joint position error (JPE). This clinical test is typically performed using a laser pointer to examine the accuracy of returning to a neutral head position (NHP) or target head position (THP) following active neck movements. The aim of this study was to determine the measurement properties of JPE using a laser pointer when tested in people with and without CNP under a variety of different testing conditions (i.e., different movement directions, sitting versus standing, NHP versus THP).
METHODS
Forty-three participants (23 asymptomatic and 20 with CNP) underwent neck proprioception testing, returning to a NHP and THP in both sitting and standing positions (six trials for each test). A laser pointer was secured on the participant's forehead and inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors were placed beneath the laser pointer and at the level of the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra. Both the absolute and the constant JPE were assessed.
FINDINGS
For the asymptomatic participants, good reliability (ICC: 0.79) was found only for right rotation of the THP task in sitting. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found in flexion for the THP task. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found for right rotation of the THP for the absolute JPE and left rotation (ICC: 0.85) for the constant error of the NHP task. In those with CNP, when tested in sitting, good reliability was found for flexion (ICC: 0.8) for the absolute JPE and good reliability (ICC range: 0.8-0.84) was found for flexion, extension, and right rotation for the constant JPE. In standing, good reliability (ICC range: 0.81-0.88) was found for flexion, and rotation for the absolute JPE. The constant JPE showed good reliability (ICC: 0.85) for right rotation and excellent reliability (ICC: 0.93) for flexion. Validity was weak to strong (r range: 0.26-0.83) and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.47-0.93) for absolute and constant error respectively, when tested in sitting. In standing, the validity was weak to very strong (0.38-0.96) for the absolute JPE and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.54-0.92) for the constant JPE.
CONCLUSION
The reliability of the measure of JPE when tested in sitting and standing in both groups showed good reliability, but not for all movements. The results of the current study also showed that the laser pointer correlated well with the Noraxon IMUs, but not for all movements. The results of the current study support the use of the JPE using a laser pointer in clinical and research settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37824590
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292798
pii: PONE-D-23-16229
pmc: PMC10569517
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0292798Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 AlDahas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Man Ther. 2015 Jun;20(3):378-87
pubmed: 25787919
J Man Manip Ther. 2016 Sep;24(4):210-4
pubmed: 27582620
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(18):486
pubmed: 31700922
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 1;35(3):294-7
pubmed: 20075783
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):400-17
pubmed: 19521015
Stat Med. 1998 Jan 15;17(1):101-10
pubmed: 9463853
Gait Posture. 2006 Jan;23(1):22-31
pubmed: 16311191
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2014 Apr;73(4):122-6
pubmed: 24765562
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015 Mar;30(3):260-8
pubmed: 25686675
Physiother Theory Pract. 2008 Sep-Oct;24(5):380-91
pubmed: 18821444
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010 Aug;30(4):190
pubmed: 21253284
Man Ther. 2013 Dec;18(6):562-7
pubmed: 23810427
Man Ther. 2015 Jun;20(3):368-77
pubmed: 25703454
Man Ther. 2008 Feb;13(1):2-11
pubmed: 17702636
Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):143-164
pubmed: 33464539
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Man Ther. 2015 Dec;20(6):736-44
pubmed: 25983238
Eur Spine J. 2015 Dec;24(12):2885-91
pubmed: 26438174
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Nov 15;32(24):E692-701
pubmed: 18007229
Man Ther. 2013 Oct;18(5):403-9
pubmed: 23473752
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804
pubmed: 16000093
Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Jul - Aug;21(4):259-267
pubmed: 28558952
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Jan;42(1):75-81
pubmed: 31054596
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 30;7:1466
pubmed: 27746750
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1309-15
pubmed: 24482302
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010 Oct;20(5):1014-20
pubmed: 20005126
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Apr;72(5):288-91
pubmed: 2009044
Man Ther. 2009 Jun;14(3):270-7
pubmed: 18514016
Man Ther. 2009 Feb;14(1):110-4
pubmed: 18502679
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jul;82(7):911-9
pubmed: 11441377
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Dec 04;15:408
pubmed: 25477032
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2011 Sep;55(3):222-32
pubmed: 21886284
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768
pubmed: 29481436
Clin Rehabil. 2003 Nov;17(7):768-74
pubmed: 14606744
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;98(6):1257-1271
pubmed: 27771360
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157
pubmed: 29435801
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Oct;43:103-109
pubmed: 31376618
J Vestib Res. 2013;23(6):271-7
pubmed: 24447966