Tocolysis after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and 5-year outcomes: a population-based cohort study.

EPIPAGE-2 neurodevelopment neurodevelopmental disabilities obstetrical intervention preterm children preterm prelabor rupture of membranes propensity score school age tocolysis

Journal

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1097-6868
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 12 07 2023
revised: 29 09 2023
accepted: 06 10 2023
pubmed: 13 10 2023
medline: 13 10 2023
entrez: 12 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The administration of tocolytics after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes remains a controversial practice. In theory, reducing uterine contractility should delay delivery and allow for optimal antenatal management, thereby reducing the risks for prematurity and adverse consequences over the life course. However, tocolysis may be associated with neonatal death or long-term adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, mainly related to prolonged fetal exposure to intrauterine infection or inflammation. In a previous study, we showed that tocolysis administration was not associated with short-term benefits. There are currently no data available to evaluate the impact of tocolysis on neurodevelopmental outcomes in school-aged children born prematurely in this clinical setting. This study aimed to investigate whether tocolysis administered after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes at 5.5 years of age. We used data from a prospective, population-based cohort study of preterm births recruited in 2011 (referred to as the EPIPAGE-2 study) and for whom the results of a comprehensive medical and neurodevelopmental assessment of the infant at age 5.5 years were available. We included pregnant individuals with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes at 24 to 32 weeks' gestation in singleton pregnancies with a live fetus at the time of rupture, birth at 24 to 34 weeks' gestation, and participation of the infant in an assessment at 5.5 years of age. Exposure was the administration of any tocolytic treatment after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. The main outcome was survival without moderate to severe neurodevelopmental disabilities at 5.5 years of age. Secondary outcomes included survival without any neurodevelopmental disabilities, cerebral palsy, full-scale intelligence quotient, developmental coordination disorders, and behavioral difficulties. A propensity-score analysis was used to minimize the indication bias in the estimation of the treatment effect on outcomes. Overall, 596 of 803 pregnant individuals (73.4%) received tocolytics after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. At the 5.5-year follow-up, 82.7% and 82.5% of the children in the tocolysis and no tocolysis groups, respectively, were alive without moderate to severe neurodevelopmental disabilities; 52.7% and 51.1%, respectively, were alive without any neurodevelopmental disabilities. After applying multiple imputations and inverse probability of treatment weighting, we found no association between the exposure to tocolytics and survival without moderate to severe neurodevelopmental disabilities (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.60), survival without any neurodevelopmental disabilities (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.61), or any of the other outcomes. There was no difference in the neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 5.5 years among children with and without antenatal exposure to tocolysis after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. To date, the health benefits of tocolytics remain unproven, both in the short- and long-term.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The administration of tocolytics after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes remains a controversial practice. In theory, reducing uterine contractility should delay delivery and allow for optimal antenatal management, thereby reducing the risks for prematurity and adverse consequences over the life course. However, tocolysis may be associated with neonatal death or long-term adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, mainly related to prolonged fetal exposure to intrauterine infection or inflammation. In a previous study, we showed that tocolysis administration was not associated with short-term benefits. There are currently no data available to evaluate the impact of tocolysis on neurodevelopmental outcomes in school-aged children born prematurely in this clinical setting.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate whether tocolysis administered after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes at 5.5 years of age.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
We used data from a prospective, population-based cohort study of preterm births recruited in 2011 (referred to as the EPIPAGE-2 study) and for whom the results of a comprehensive medical and neurodevelopmental assessment of the infant at age 5.5 years were available. We included pregnant individuals with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes at 24 to 32 weeks' gestation in singleton pregnancies with a live fetus at the time of rupture, birth at 24 to 34 weeks' gestation, and participation of the infant in an assessment at 5.5 years of age. Exposure was the administration of any tocolytic treatment after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. The main outcome was survival without moderate to severe neurodevelopmental disabilities at 5.5 years of age. Secondary outcomes included survival without any neurodevelopmental disabilities, cerebral palsy, full-scale intelligence quotient, developmental coordination disorders, and behavioral difficulties. A propensity-score analysis was used to minimize the indication bias in the estimation of the treatment effect on outcomes.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, 596 of 803 pregnant individuals (73.4%) received tocolytics after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. At the 5.5-year follow-up, 82.7% and 82.5% of the children in the tocolysis and no tocolysis groups, respectively, were alive without moderate to severe neurodevelopmental disabilities; 52.7% and 51.1%, respectively, were alive without any neurodevelopmental disabilities. After applying multiple imputations and inverse probability of treatment weighting, we found no association between the exposure to tocolytics and survival without moderate to severe neurodevelopmental disabilities (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.60), survival without any neurodevelopmental disabilities (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.61), or any of the other outcomes.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
There was no difference in the neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 5.5 years among children with and without antenatal exposure to tocolysis after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. To date, the health benefits of tocolytics remain unproven, both in the short- and long-term.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37827270
pii: S0002-9378(23)00739-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.010
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Investigateurs

Pierre-Yves Ancel (PY)
Catherine Arnaud (C)
Chloé Arthuis (C)
Julie Blanc (J)
Pascal Boileau (P)
Thierry Debillon (T)
Pierre Delorme (P)
Claude D'Ercole (C)
Thomas Desplanches (T)
PhD Rm (P)
Caroline Diguisto (C)
Laurence Foix-L'Hélias (L)
Géraldine Gascoin (G)
Catherine Gire (C)
François Goffinet (F)
Isabelle Guellec (I)
Gilles Kayem (G)
Bruno Langer (B)
Mathilde Letouzey (M)
Elsa Lorthe (E)
Emeline Maisonneuve (E)
Stéphane Marret (S)
Isabelle Monier (I)
PhD Rm (P)
Andrei Morgan (A)
Jean-Christophe Rozé (JC)
Thomas Schmitz (T)
Loïc Sentilhes (L)
Damien Subtil (D)
Héloïse Torchin (H)
Barthélémy Tosello (B)
Christophe Vayssière (C)
Norbert Winer (N)
Jennifer Zeitlin (J)

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Elsa Lorthe (E)

Unit of Population Epidemiology, Department of Primary Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; Université Paris Cité, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France. Electronic address: elsa.lorthe@gmail.com.

Laetitia Marchand-Martin (L)

Université Paris Cité, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France.

Mathilde Letouzey (M)

Université Paris Cité, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France; Department of Neonatal Pediatrics, Poissy Saint Germain Hospital, Poissy, France.

Adrien M Aubert (AM)

Université Paris Cité, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France.

Véronique Pierrat (V)

Université Paris Cité, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France; Department of Neonatology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Créteil, Créteil, France.

Valérie Benhammou (V)

Université Paris Cité, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France.

Pierre Delorme (P)

Université Paris Cité, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Armand Trousseau Hospital, APHP, FHU Prema, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Stéphane Marret (S)

Department of Neonatal Pediatrics, Intensive Care, and Neuropediatrics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France; Inserm Unit 1245, Team Perinatal Handicap, School of Medicine of Rouen, Normandy University, Normandy, France.

Pierre-Yves Ancel (PY)

Université Paris Cité, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France; Clinical Research Unit, Center for Clinical Investigation P1419, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

François Goffinet (F)

Université Paris Cité, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France; AP-HP Centre, Maternité Port-Royal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Université Paris Cité, FHU PREMA, Paris, France.

Laurence Foix L'Hélias (LF)

Université Paris Cité, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France; Department of Neonatal Pediatrics, Armand Trousseau Hospital, APHP, FHU Prema, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Gilles Kayem (G)

Université Paris Cité, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Paris, France; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Armand Trousseau Hospital, APHP, FHU Prema, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH