[The third-generation modern cementing technique in hip and knee arthroplasty].
Moderne Zementiertechnik der dritten Generation in der Knie- und Hüftendoprothetik.
Bone cement
Cementation
Joint replacement
PMMA
Revision, joint
Journal
Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)
ISSN: 2731-7153
Titre abrégé: Orthopadie (Heidelb)
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9918384887206676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
accepted:
01
09
2023
medline:
4
12
2023
pubmed:
13
10
2023
entrez:
12
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Implant loosening is the most common reason for revision surgery. Contribution of modern cementing technique to the long-term stability of an implant. Evaluation of the available evidence on modern cementing technique. Modern cementing technique in hip arthroplasty is considered established and leads to better cementing results. In knee arthroplasty, there are also specific recommendations, including intensive cleaning of the bone bed, mixing of bone cement under vacuum and application of bone cement to the implant and the bone. The use of modern cementing technique in hip and knee arthroplasty facilitates cementing, increases safety, and minimizes the risk of mechanical loosening. HINTERGRUND: Implantatlockerung ist der häufigste Grund für Revisionseingriffe. Beitrag der modernen Zementiertechnik zur langfristigen Stabilität eines Implantats. Auswertung der verfügbaren Evidenzen zur modernen Zementiertechnik. Die moderne Zementiertechnik in der Hüftendoprothetik gilt als etabliert und führt zu optimalen Zementierergebnissen. In der Knieendoprothetik gibt es ebenfalls konkrete Empfehlungen, darunter die intensive Reinigung des Knochenbetts, Anmischen des Knochenzements unter Vakuum und Applikation des Knochenzements auf das Implantat und den Knochen. Die Verwendung der modernen Zementiertechnik in Knie- und Hüftendoprothetik erleichtert das Zementieren, erhöht die Sicherheit und minimiert das Risiko für mechanische Lockerungen.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Implant loosening is the most common reason for revision surgery.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
Contribution of modern cementing technique to the long-term stability of an implant.
METHODS
METHODS
Evaluation of the available evidence on modern cementing technique.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Modern cementing technique in hip arthroplasty is considered established and leads to better cementing results. In knee arthroplasty, there are also specific recommendations, including intensive cleaning of the bone bed, mixing of bone cement under vacuum and application of bone cement to the implant and the bone.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The use of modern cementing technique in hip and knee arthroplasty facilitates cementing, increases safety, and minimizes the risk of mechanical loosening.
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
UNASSIGNED
HINTERGRUND: Implantatlockerung ist der häufigste Grund für Revisionseingriffe.
FRAGESTELLUNG
UNASSIGNED
Beitrag der modernen Zementiertechnik zur langfristigen Stabilität eines Implantats.
MATERIAL UND METHODE
UNASSIGNED
Auswertung der verfügbaren Evidenzen zur modernen Zementiertechnik.
ERGEBNISSE
UNASSIGNED
Die moderne Zementiertechnik in der Hüftendoprothetik gilt als etabliert und führt zu optimalen Zementierergebnissen. In der Knieendoprothetik gibt es ebenfalls konkrete Empfehlungen, darunter die intensive Reinigung des Knochenbetts, Anmischen des Knochenzements unter Vakuum und Applikation des Knochenzements auf das Implantat und den Knochen.
SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN
UNASSIGNED
Die Verwendung der modernen Zementiertechnik in Knie- und Hüftendoprothetik erleichtert das Zementieren, erhöht die Sicherheit und minimiert das Risiko für mechanische Lockerungen.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(ger)
HINTERGRUND: Implantatlockerung ist der häufigste Grund für Revisionseingriffe.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37828239
doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04446-7
pii: 10.1007/s00132-023-04446-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Cements
0
Types de publication
English Abstract
Journal Article
Review
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
968-980Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.
Références
Billi F, Kavanaugh A, Schmalzried H et al (2019) Techniques for improving the initial strength of the tibial tray-cement interface bond. Bone Joint J 101:53–58
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0500.R1
pubmed: 30648489
Bökeler U, Bühler A, Eschbach D et al (2022) The influence of a modified 3rd generation cementation technique and vaccum mixing of bone cement on the bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS) in geriatric patients with cemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. Medicina (Kaunas) 58(11):1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111587
doi: 10.3390/medicina58111587
pubmed: 36363544
Boruah S, Chen AF, Muratoglu OK et al (2022) Does bone penetration of cement differ by cement type and application time-point? Med Eng Phys 101:103768
doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103768
pubmed: 35232548
Breusch S, Malchau H (2006) The well-cemented total hip arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN: 978-3-540-24197-3
Donaldson AJ, Thomson HE, Harper NJ et al (2009) Bone cement implantation syndrome. Br J Anaesth 102(1):12–22
doi: 10.1093/bja/aen328
pubmed: 19059919
Dunne N, Orr J (2001) Influence of mixing techniques on the physical properties of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials 22(13):1819–1826
doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00363-X
pubmed: 11396886
Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (2022) Jahresbericht
Hampton CB, Berliner ZP, Nguyen JT et al (2020) Aseptic loosening at the tibia in total knee arthroplasty: a function of cement mantle quality? J Arthroplasty 35(6):S190–S196
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.028
pubmed: 32171492
Hansen E, Kühn K‑D (2022) Essentials of cemented knee arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN: 978-3-662-63112-6
doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-63113-3
Hargrove R, Ridgeway S, Russell R et al (2006) Does pulse lavage reduce hip hemiarthroplasty infection rates? J Hosp Infect 62(4):446–449
doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.07.012
pubmed: 16488057
Helwig P, Konstantinidis L, Hirschmüller A et al (2013) Tibial cleaning method for cemented total knee arthroplasty: an experimental study. Indian J Orthop 47(1):18–22
doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.106887
pubmed: 23531916
pmcid: 3601228
Irmola T, Ponkilainen V, Mäkelä KT et al (2021) Association between fixation type and revision risk in total knee arthroplasty patients aged 65 years and older: a cohort study of 265,877 patients from the nordic arthroplasty register association 2000–2016. Acta Orthop 92(1):91–96
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1837422
pubmed: 33143501
Jelecevic J, Maidanjuk S, Leithner A et al (2014) Methyl methacrylate levels in orthopedic surgery: comparison of two conventional vacuum mixing systems. Ann Occup Hyg 58(4):493–500
pubmed: 24567286
Karpiński R, Szabelski J, Maksymiuk J (2019) Effect of physiological fluids contamination on selected mechanical properties of acrylate bone cement. Materials 12(23):3963
doi: 10.3390/ma12233963
pubmed: 31795371
pmcid: 6926979
Khanuja HS, Mekkawy KL, MacMahon A et al (2022) Revisiting cemented femoral fixation in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 104(11):1024–1033
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00853
pubmed: 35298444
Kühn K‑D (2014) PMMA cements. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN: 978-3-642-41535-7
Li C, Mason J, Yakimicki D (2004) Thermal characterization of PMMA-based bone cement curing. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15(1):85–89
doi: 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000010101.45352.d1
pubmed: 15338595
Lutz MJ, Pincus PF, Whitehouse SL et al (2009) The effect of cement gun and cement syringe use on the tibial cement mantle in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24(3):461–467
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.028
pubmed: 18534458
Matthews JJ, Ball L, Blake SM et al (2009) Combined syringe cement pressurisation and intra-osseous suction: an effective technique in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 75(5):637–641
pubmed: 19999876
Miller MA, Terbush MJ, Goodheart JR et al (2014) Increased initial cement-bone interlock correlates with reduced total knee arthroplasty micro-motion following in vivo service. J Biomech 47(10):2460–2466
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.016
pubmed: 24795171
pmcid: 4100248
Perez Mañanes R, MArtin Vaquero J, Villanueva Martínez M (2011) Influence of the fixing technique on the quality of the cement mantle in knee arthroplasty. Experimental study on a synthetic model. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología 55(1):39–49
doi: 10.1016/S1988-8856(11)70279-6
Randall DJ, Anderson MB, Gililland JM et al (2019) A potential need for surgeon consensus: cementation techniques for total knee arthroplasty in orthopedic implant manufacturers’ guidelines lack consistency. J Orthop Surg 27(3):2309499019878258
doi: 10.1177/2309499019878258
Rassir R, Schuiling M, Sierevelt IN et al (2021) What are the frequency, related mortality, and factors associated with bone cement implantation syndrome in arthroplasty surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res 479(4):755–763
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001541
pubmed: 33165048
Refsum AM, Nguyen UV, Gjertsen J‑E et al (2019) Cementing technique for primary knee arthroplasty: a scoping review. Acta Orthop 90(6):582–589
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1657333
pubmed: 31452416
pmcid: 6844414
Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C et al (2014) Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today—has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty 29(9):1774–1778
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.024
pubmed: 25007726
Sigmund IK, Gamper J, Antoni A et al (2018) Mixing technique of PMMA—bone cement determines the ideal insertion time point in cemented arthroplasty. J Surg 9(12) https://doi.org/10.29011/2575-9760.001153
Skwara A, Figiel J, Knott T et al (2009) Primary stability of tibial components in TKA: in vitro comparison of two cementing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(10):1199–1205
doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0849-2
pubmed: 19572121
Sundfeldt M, Carlsson LV, Johansson CB et al (2006) Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories. Acta Orthop 77(2):177–197
doi: 10.1080/17453670610045902
pubmed: 16752278
Takahashi E, Kaneuji A, Tsuda R et al (2017) The influence of cement thickness on stem subsidence and cement creep in a collarless polished tapered stem: when are thick cement mantles detrimental? Bone Joint Res 6(5):351–357
doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.65.BJR-2017-0028.R1
pubmed: 28566327
pmcid: 5457643
Trela-Larsen L, Sayers A, Blom AW et al (2018) The association between cement type and the subsequent risk of revision surgery in primary total hip replacement. Acta Orthop 89(1):40–46
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1393224
pubmed: 29072088
Vaninbroukx M, Labey L, Innocenti B et al (2009) Cementing the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: which technique is the best? Knee 16(4):265–268
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.11.015
pubmed: 19138857
Vanlommel J, Luyckx JP, Labey L et al (2011) Cementing the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: which technique is the best? J Arthroplasty 26(3):492–496
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.107
pubmed: 20381290
Wang JS, Franzén H, Jonsson E et al (1993) Porosity of bone cement reduced by mixing and collecting under vacuum. Acta Orthop Scand 64(2):143–146
doi: 10.3109/17453679308994555
pubmed: 8498171
Whitehouse MR, Atwal NS, Pabbruwe M et al (2014) Osteonecrosis with the use of polymethylmethacrylate cement for hip replacement: thermal-induced damage evidenced in vivo by decreased osteocyte viability. Eur Cell Mater 27:50–62 (discussion 62–3)
doi: 10.22203/eCM.v027a05
pubmed: 24464728