Clear aligner therapy practice among orthodontists in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland: A cross-sectional survey of the British Orthodontic Society membership.

Invisalign clear aligner therapy orthodontic practice survey

Journal

Journal of orthodontics
ISSN: 1465-3133
Titre abrégé: J Orthod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957268

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 13 10 2023
pubmed: 13 10 2023
entrez: 13 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To investigate clear aligner therapy (CAT) practice among orthodontists in the British Orthodontic Society (BOS). A cross-sectional online survey. An electronic survey was distributed to members of the BOS in 2022. The survey comprised questions regarding respondent demographics, general use of CAT, the choice of proprietary CAT appliances, CAT planning, case selection, treatment protocols and orthodontist-reported CAT problems. Overall, 233 (19.5%) responses were received with the majority (n = 121, 53.1%) being female. Most respondents reported practising in England (n = 171, 74.7%). The majority (n = 177, 77.3%) indicated that they used CAT in their practice, with 48.1% (n = 81) treating 1-20 patients with CAT annually. The most frequently prescribed CAT system was Invisalign (n = 138, 81.2%). One to three changes to the initial digital treatment plan were made by 72.9% (n = 121) with final tooth positions being the most common reason for adjustment (64.4%). Most (n = 97, 60.3%) rarely or never performed premolar extractions with CAT. Of the respondents, 23 12.7%) reported that they always or mostly used a remote monitoring system in conjunction with CAT, with a wide range of aligner change protocols reported. The median number of months required to complete non-extraction CAT reported by the respondents was 12. Most respondents (n = 77, 51.7%) did not feel that CAT provides superior outcomes compared with fixed appliance therapy. CAT practice varied widely among the surveyed orthodontists. A predilection for the use of Invisalign and utility in less severe cases was noted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37830274
doi: 10.1177/14653125231204889
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

14653125231204889

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Maurice J Meade (MJ)

Orthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Tony Weir (T)

Orthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Jadbinder Seehra (J)

Centre for Craniofacial Development & Regeneration, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Padhraig S Fleming (PS)

Division of Public and Child Dental Health, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Classifications MeSH