Safety of Same-Day Hospital Discharge Post Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Findings from a Multicenter Study.
intracardiac echocardiography
patent foramen ovale
same-day discharge
Journal
The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2023
01 12 2023
Historique:
received:
01
05
2023
revised:
05
09
2023
accepted:
09
09
2023
medline:
13
11
2023
pubmed:
14
10
2023
entrez:
13
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is indicated for patients with cryptogenic stroke. Although procedural safety is well established, there are limited data on the safety of same-day (SD) discharge. We aimed to review the outcomes of PFO closure with SD. Patients who underwent transcatheter PFO closure between January 2011 and May 2022 at 4 large US hospitals were retrospectively analyzed, comparing outcomes of SD versus delayed discharge (DD). The primary end point was a composite of access-site complication, stroke, device embolization, atrial arrhythmia, and bleeding. Secondary analysis comparing imaging modality and outcomes was performed. 554 patients (49.2% female) were analyzed (382 discharged SD). Average age was 54.3 ± 15. Baseline characteristics in both groups were broadly similar. Previous stroke (78.0% SD vs 76.2% DD, p = 0.32) was the commonest indication for PFO closure. In the SD group, there was less general anesthesia use (5.5% vs 16.9%, p <0.001). Intraprocedural intracardiac echocardiography was used more frequently in SD cases (95.0% vs 81.4%, p <0.001). In the DD group, median stay was 1 night, and 34.9% stayed beyond 1 night. At 30 days, there was no difference in the primary composite end point (14.9% vs 11.6%, p = 0.15). There was no inter-group difference in individual adverse events (all p >0.05). When comparing imaging modality and outcomes, there was no difference in composite end points between transesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography (6.5% vs 14.7%, p = 0.063). In conclusion, SD discharge after transcatheter PFO closure appears safe. This efficient approach may be advantageous in optimizing workflow and minimizing hospital occupancy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37832208
pii: S0002-9149(23)01028-7
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.045
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
118-123Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Garcia supported by Harold C. Schott Endowed Chair in Structural heart disease. Institutional grant support from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and BSCI. Advisory board: BSCI. Consultant and proctor: Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Price reports consulting honoraria, speaker's fees, and proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific; consulting honoraria from W.L. Gore, Baylis Medical, Biotronik, and Philips; consulting honoraria and speaker's fees from Medtronic; consulting honoraria from Biosense Webster and Shockwave; and has equity interest in Indian Wells, Inc. Dr. Mahadevan is a principal investigator for Abbott and GORE research studies. The authors have no competing interests to declare.