Sense of coherence in a general adult population in Northern Norway and its associations with oral health.


Journal

BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 10 2023
Historique:
received: 18 01 2023
accepted: 20 09 2023
medline: 23 10 2023
pubmed: 14 10 2023
entrez: 13 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Sense of coherence (SOC) is a global orientation to life that may affect a person's way of acting and living within his or her life context, which can have an impact on general and oral health. The aims of this study were (i) to describe the distribution of SOC in a general adult population; (ii) to explore whether sociodemographic characteristics, oral health-related behaviours, self-reported oral health, and clinical oral status were associated with SOC; and (iii) to explore whether SOC was associated with self-reported oral health, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, oral health-related behaviours, and oral clinical status. This study was based on data from the cross-sectional population-based study Oral Health in Northern Norway (N = 1819 individuals, 923 women, mean age 47.1 ± 15.2 years). Data were collected between October 2013 and November 2014 in Troms County. Participants answered a questionnaire that included items on SOC, sociodemographic characteristics, oral health-related behaviours, and self-reported oral health. Clinical oral status (number of teeth, dental caries, and periodontal status) was determined through oral and radiographic examination. Linear regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with SOC. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine SOC and its association with self-reported oral health adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, behaviours, and clinical oral status. The mean SOC score was 68.5 (standard deviation 10.5). The younger age groups (20-29 and 30-39 years) had mean SOC scores of 64.0 (95% CI: 62.7,65.3) and 67.2 (95% CI: 66.0,68.5), respectively, and the older age groups (40-79 years) had mean SOC scores between 69.8 and 70.1 (95% CI: 68.2,71.3). A higher mean SOC score was associated with older age, higher education level, higher income (all p < 0.001), being married/cohabiting (p = 0.005), and toothbrushing ≥ 2 times/day (p = 0.008). Approximately 49% of participants reported good oral health. SOC was positively associated with self-reported good oral health in the adjusted model (odds ratio:1.03 [95% CI: 1.02,1.05] p < 0.001). SOC was associated with sociodemographic characteristics and toothbrushing habits. There was no significant association between SOC and clinical oral status; however, SOC was positively associated with self-reported good oral health. This indicates that a person's SOC might have an impact on how an individual perceives their oral health, independent of sociodemographic characteristics and the presence of oral diseases.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Sense of coherence (SOC) is a global orientation to life that may affect a person's way of acting and living within his or her life context, which can have an impact on general and oral health. The aims of this study were (i) to describe the distribution of SOC in a general adult population; (ii) to explore whether sociodemographic characteristics, oral health-related behaviours, self-reported oral health, and clinical oral status were associated with SOC; and (iii) to explore whether SOC was associated with self-reported oral health, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, oral health-related behaviours, and oral clinical status.
METHODS
This study was based on data from the cross-sectional population-based study Oral Health in Northern Norway (N = 1819 individuals, 923 women, mean age 47.1 ± 15.2 years). Data were collected between October 2013 and November 2014 in Troms County. Participants answered a questionnaire that included items on SOC, sociodemographic characteristics, oral health-related behaviours, and self-reported oral health. Clinical oral status (number of teeth, dental caries, and periodontal status) was determined through oral and radiographic examination. Linear regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with SOC. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine SOC and its association with self-reported oral health adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, behaviours, and clinical oral status.
RESULTS
The mean SOC score was 68.5 (standard deviation 10.5). The younger age groups (20-29 and 30-39 years) had mean SOC scores of 64.0 (95% CI: 62.7,65.3) and 67.2 (95% CI: 66.0,68.5), respectively, and the older age groups (40-79 years) had mean SOC scores between 69.8 and 70.1 (95% CI: 68.2,71.3). A higher mean SOC score was associated with older age, higher education level, higher income (all p < 0.001), being married/cohabiting (p = 0.005), and toothbrushing ≥ 2 times/day (p = 0.008). Approximately 49% of participants reported good oral health. SOC was positively associated with self-reported good oral health in the adjusted model (odds ratio:1.03 [95% CI: 1.02,1.05] p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
SOC was associated with sociodemographic characteristics and toothbrushing habits. There was no significant association between SOC and clinical oral status; however, SOC was positively associated with self-reported good oral health. This indicates that a person's SOC might have an impact on how an individual perceives their oral health, independent of sociodemographic characteristics and the presence of oral diseases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37833723
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03430-z
pii: 10.1186/s12903-023-03430-z
pmc: PMC10576349
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

755

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

Soc Sci Med. 1993 Mar;36(6):725-33
pubmed: 8480217
Health Promot Int. 2016 Dec;31(4):869-878
pubmed: 26208654
Int J Dent Hyg. 2016 May;14(2):142-50
pubmed: 26053305
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jun;46(6):830-7
pubmed: 19201408
J Dent Res. 2015 Oct;94(10):1362-8
pubmed: 26130261
J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:1206-1210
pubmed: 32663952
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998 Apr;26(2):87-94
pubmed: 9645401
Fam Community Health. 2021 Jul-Sep 01;44(3):225-234
pubmed: 32842003
J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Nov;37(11):981-7
pubmed: 20670340
Indian J Dent Res. 2022 Apr-Jun;33(2):141-145
pubmed: 36254949
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Jan;71(1):256-62
pubmed: 22452573
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2016 Feb 19;75:30169
pubmed: 26900910
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Aug;61(8):684-8
pubmed: 17630366
Caries Res. 2012;46(6):523-9
pubmed: 22889725
Community Dent Health. 2004 Dec;21(4):271-6
pubmed: 15617411
Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):1973-1983
pubmed: 29532319
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jun;66(12):2401-12
pubmed: 18336974
Qual Life Res. 2007 Apr;16(3):483-93
pubmed: 17091360
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;39(6):542-53
pubmed: 21740457
Acta Odontol Scand. 2016 Jul;74(5):368-73
pubmed: 27244670
Community Dent Health. 2009 Dec;26(4):197-203
pubmed: 20088216
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0133918
pubmed: 26275064
Acta Odontol Scand. 2017 Nov;75(8):557-563
pubmed: 28754061
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(1):1-8
pubmed: 19843629
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Aug;41(8):760-5
pubmed: 24813815
Gerodontology. 2017 Sep;34(3):377-381
pubmed: 28512757
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Sep 30;10:361
pubmed: 34761047
Eur J Public Health. 2004 Sep;14(3):322-30
pubmed: 15369042
Community Dent Health. 2022 May 27;39(2):74-85
pubmed: 35020281
Scand J Public Health. 2014 Jul;42(5):434-45
pubmed: 24662308
Health Promot Int. 2020 Jun 1;35(3):586-597
pubmed: 31071224
Acta Odontol Scand. 2011 Jan;69(1):12-20
pubmed: 20860429
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Jun;59(6):460-6
pubmed: 15911640
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 May;60(5):376-81
pubmed: 16614325
Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Mar;25(4):1491-1498
pubmed: 32267449
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S159-S172
pubmed: 29926952
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Aug;117(4):413-8
pubmed: 19627353
J Dent Res. 2012 Nov;91(11):1038-42
pubmed: 22983410

Auteurs

Kine Margrethe Mathisen (KM)

Department of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. kine.mathisen@uit.no.

Gro Eirin Holde (GE)

Department of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
The Public Dental Health Service Competence Centre of Northern Norway (TkNN), Tromsø, Norway.

Steffen Torp (S)

Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Vestfold, Norway.

Birgitta Jönsson (B)

The Public Dental Health Service Competence Centre of Northern Norway (TkNN), Tromsø, Norway.
Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH