Evaluation of the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography image segmentation of isolated tooth roots based on the dynamic threshold method.
Cone-beam computed tomography
Root surface area
Threshold-based method
Tooth root segmentation
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 10 2023
13 10 2023
Historique:
received:
12
07
2023
accepted:
18
09
2023
medline:
1
11
2023
pubmed:
14
10
2023
entrez:
14
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accurate quantification of the root surface area (RSA) plays a decisive role in the advancement of periodontal, orthodontic, and restorative treatment modalities. In this study, we aimed to develop a dynamic threshold-based computer-aided system for segmentation and calculation of the RSA of isolated teeth on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to assess the accuracy of the measured data. We selected 24 teeth to be extracted, including single-rooted and multi-rooted teeth, from 22 patients who required tooth extraction. In the experimental group, we scanned 24 isolated teeth using CBCT with a voxel size of 0.3 mm. We designed a computer-aided system based on a personalized dynamic threshold algorithm to automatically segment the roots of 24 isolated teeth in CBCT images and calculate the RSA. In the control group, we employed digital intraoral scanner devices to perform optical scanning on 24 isolated teeth and subsequently manually segmented the roots using 3-matic software to calculate the RSA. We used the paired t-test (P < 0.05) and Bland-Altman plots to analyze the consistency of the two measurement methods. The results of the paired t-test showed that there was no significant difference in the RSAs obtained using the dynamic threshold method and the optical scanning image reconstruction (t = 1.005, P = 0.325 > 0.05). As per the Bland-Altman plot, the results were evenly distributed within the region of ± 1.96 standard deviations of the mean, with no increasing or decreasing trends and good consistency. In this study, we designed a computer-aided root segmentation system based on a personalized dynamic threshold algorithm to automatically segment the roots of isolated teeth in CBCT images with a voxel size of 0.3 mm. We found that the RSA calculated using this approach was highly accurate, and a voxel of 0.3 mm in size could accurately display the surface area data in CBCT images. Overall, our findings in this study provide a foundation for future work on accurate automatic segmentation of tooth roots in full-mouth CBCT images and the computation of RSA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37833773
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03423-y
pii: 10.1186/s12903-023-03423-y
pmc: PMC10571368
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
752Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4 Suppl):S100-8
pubmed: 20381750
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 May;119(5):505-10
pubmed: 11343022
Skin Res Technol. 2020 Jan;26(1):67-75
pubmed: 31423660
Imaging Sci Dent. 2017 Jun;47(2):117-122
pubmed: 28680848
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(8):20150079
pubmed: 25996572
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Jul;12(7):513-23
pubmed: 26877741
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011 Nov;14(4):206-12
pubmed: 22008300
Dent Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;52(4):707-30, v
pubmed: 18805225
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(7):20150070
pubmed: 25900235
J Periodontol. 2012 Jan;83(1):50-4
pubmed: 21563950
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jan;137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7
pubmed: 20122425
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jan;115(1):121-7
pubmed: 23217543
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 May;119(5):511-5
pubmed: 11343023
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):140
pubmed: 35473932
J Periodontol. 1996 Jul;67(7):666-74
pubmed: 8832477
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019 Nov;128(5):552-557
pubmed: 31171483
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Jan;24(1):1-7
pubmed: 33473018
J Dent Res. 2020 Jul;99(7):769-774
pubmed: 32315260
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140238
pubmed: 25315442
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):36-42
pubmed: 28024822
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1082-91
pubmed: 24629139
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Aug;26(4):813-20
pubmed: 23254628
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May;23(5):2235-2244
pubmed: 30284102
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Dec;108(6):939-45
pubmed: 19875312
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Apr;43(3):355-9
pubmed: 25600025
J Xray Sci Technol. 2020;28(5):905-922
pubmed: 32986647
Arch Oral Biol. 2016 Mar;63:75-81
pubmed: 26723016
J Prosthodont. 2016 Jun;25(4):282-7
pubmed: 26618259
J Endod. 2011 Jan;37(1):75-9
pubmed: 21146082
Korean J Orthod. 2023 Mar 25;53(2):77-88
pubmed: 36960719
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):916-22
pubmed: 24286915
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):461-8
pubmed: 18639404
Imaging Sci Dent. 2018 Sep;48(3):177-184
pubmed: 30276154
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Feb;139(2):e117-27
pubmed: 21300222
J Periodontol. 1996 Jul;67(7):658-65
pubmed: 8832476
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jul;144(1):147-55
pubmed: 23810056
J Endod. 2019 Jul;45(7):917-922.e5
pubmed: 31160078
J Clin Periodontol. 1994 Apr;21(4):225-9
pubmed: 8195437
Dent Mater. 2020 Jan;36(1):9-24
pubmed: 31526522
Dent Traumatol. 2013 Feb;29(1):41-6
pubmed: 22413921