Flexural Strength Analysis of Different Complete Denture Resin-Based Materials Obtained by Conventional and Digital Manufacturing.

3D printing complete dentures flexural strength

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 05 09 2023
revised: 28 09 2023
accepted: 29 09 2023
medline: 14 10 2023
pubmed: 14 10 2023
entrez: 14 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate) is the material of choice to fabricate denture bases. Recently, with the introduction of CAD-CAM and 3D printers in dentistry, new materials have been proposed for complete denture manufacturing. This study compared the flexural strength of different resins fabricated using different technologies (conventional, CAD-CAM-milled, and 3D-printed) and polymerization techniques. A total of 11 different resins were tested: six PMMA conventional (Acrypol R, Acrypol LL, Acrypol HI, Acrypol Fast, Acryself and Acryslef P), two milled obtained from UDMA PMMA disks (Ivotion disk and Aadva disk, control groups), two 3D-printed PMMA resins (NextDent Denture 3D+, and SprintRayEU Denture Base), and one 3D-printed composite resin (GC Temp Print). Flexural strength was measured using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests were performed; the CAD-CAM-milled specimens showed the highest flexural strength (107.87 MPa for UDMA) followed by 3D-printed composite resins (102.96 MPa). Furthermore, 3D-printed resins polymerized for 40 min with the BB cure unit showed no statistically significant differences with conventional resin groups. Moreover, in all the 3D-printed specimens, a high correlation between polymerization technique and flexural strength was found. In terms of flexural strength, the polymerization technique is a determinant for both acrylic and composite resins. Temp Print can be a potential alternative to fabricating removable dentures and showed promising results when used in combination with pink color resin powder.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37834696
pii: ma16196559
doi: 10.3390/ma16196559
pmc: PMC10573664
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

J Adv Res. 2018 May 03;14:25-34
pubmed: 30364755
Dent Mater J. 2017 Nov 29;36(6):693-699
pubmed: 28701638
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Feb 21;2022:8353137
pubmed: 35237691
J Dent Res. 1992 Mar;71(3):434-7
pubmed: 1533403
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Apr 08;12(2):160-170
pubmed: 35462750
Biomedicines. 2022 Oct 13;10(10):
pubmed: 36289826
J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Mar;42(3):234-42
pubmed: 25327636
Dent Mater. 2022 Dec;38(12):1841-1854
pubmed: 36195470
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022 Nov 17;19:100
pubmed: 36605146
J Prosthodont. 2023 Apr;32(4):318-324
pubmed: 35567362
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):108-15
pubmed: 24373661
Biomaterials. 1990 May;11(4):272-6
pubmed: 2383623
J Prosthodont Res. 2013 Oct;57(4):288-93
pubmed: 24120309
Int J Dent. 2022 Aug 17;2022:7069507
pubmed: 36034479
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012 Jul;100(5):1444-50
pubmed: 22454327
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):146-158
pubmed: 29682823
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014 Summer;8(3):148-52
pubmed: 25346833
J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Jul 30;66(3):502-508
pubmed: 34853238
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Oct;116(4):610-616
pubmed: 27178772
Dent Mater. 2009 Mar;25(3):302-13
pubmed: 18799211
Dent Mater. 1998 Jan;14(1):51-6
pubmed: 9972151
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Apr;10(2):113-121
pubmed: 29713431
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jun;123(6):800-806.e6
pubmed: 31703921
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Feb 01;15(3):
pubmed: 36772044
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Jan;153(1):144-153
pubmed: 29287640
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;15(7):
pubmed: 35407742
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Aug 04;6(8):1498-1502
pubmed: 30159084
J Prosthodont. 2020 Jun;29(5):422-428
pubmed: 32233047
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Feb;121(2):347-352
pubmed: 30143239
J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Sep;46(3):238-41
pubmed: 7021802
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2018 Jul;16(3):151-160
pubmed: 29609487
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 May 20;23(10):
pubmed: 35628546
J Dent. 2023 May;132:104449
pubmed: 36773740
Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Nov/Dec;33(6):634-640
pubmed: 33284905
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Apr;123(4):641-646
pubmed: 31353106
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1221-1229
pubmed: 34030891
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Nov;22(8):2829-2835
pubmed: 29468600
J Prosthodont. 2013 Feb;22(2):105-11
pubmed: 22985308
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1697-1705
pubmed: 27704295

Auteurs

Alessio Casucci (A)

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Giulia Verniani (G)

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Anne Lucrèce Barbieri (AL)

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Nicolò Maria Ricci (NM)

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Edoardo Ferrari Cagidiaco (E)

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Marco Ferrari (M)

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Classifications MeSH