Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Training for Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
RAPN
annotation
artificial intelligence
artificial neural network
augmented reality
computer vision
deep learning
kidney cancer
partial nephrectomy
radical nephrectomy
renal cancer
simulation
training
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Sep 2023
27 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
22
08
2023
revised:
17
09
2023
accepted:
24
09
2023
medline:
14
10
2023
pubmed:
14
10
2023
entrez:
14
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prevalence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing due to advanced imaging techniques. Surgical resection is the standard treatment, involving complex radical and partial nephrectomy procedures that demand extensive training and planning. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) can potentially aid the training process in the field of kidney cancer. This review explores how artificial intelligence (AI) can create a framework for kidney cancer surgery to address training difficulties. Following PRISMA 2020 criteria, an exhaustive search of PubMed and SCOPUS databases was conducted without any filters or restrictions. Inclusion criteria encompassed original English articles focusing on AI's role in kidney cancer surgical training. On the other hand, all non-original articles and articles published in any language other than English were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the articles, with a third party settling any disagreement. Study specifics, AI tools, methodologies, endpoints, and outcomes were extracted by the same authors. The Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine's evidence levels were employed to assess the studies. Out of 468 identified records, 14 eligible studies were selected. Potential AI applications in kidney cancer surgical training include analyzing surgical workflow, annotating instruments, identifying tissues, and 3D reconstruction. AI is capable of appraising surgical skills, including the identification of procedural steps and instrument tracking. While AI and augmented reality (AR) enhance training, challenges persist in real-time tracking and registration. The utilization of AI-driven 3D reconstruction proves beneficial for intraoperative guidance and preoperative preparation. Artificial intelligence (AI) shows potential for advancing surgical training by providing unbiased evaluations, personalized feedback, and enhanced learning processes. Yet challenges such as consistent metric measurement, ethical concerns, and data privacy must be addressed. The integration of AI into kidney cancer surgical training offers solutions to training difficulties and a boost to surgical education. However, to fully harness its potential, additional studies are imperative.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37835812
pii: diagnostics13193070
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193070
pmc: PMC10572445
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Turk J Urol. 2020 Nov;46(Supp. 1):S27-S39
pubmed: 32479253
BJU Int. 2020 Sep;126(3):336-338
pubmed: 32401370
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Apr;14(4):685-696
pubmed: 30443889
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2323-2330
pubmed: 37368225
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):684-693
pubmed: 33201088
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1523-1531
pubmed: 30194644
World J Urol. 2022 Mar;40(3):659-670
pubmed: 35191992
Curr Opin Urol. 2018 Jan;28(1):62-79
pubmed: 29059103
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Mar;8(2):613-622
pubmed: 33941503
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Feb;14(1):
pubmed: 28660725
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Mar;9(2):388-395
pubmed: 36229343
JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 1;155(10):960-968
pubmed: 32838425
BJU Int. 2021 May;127(5):567-574
pubmed: 33064867
Surg Endosc. 2020 Dec;34(12):5377-5383
pubmed: 31996995
Urology. 2022 Jun;164:e312-e316
pubmed: 35063460
BJU Int. 2019 Oct;124(4):567-577
pubmed: 31219658
Asian J Urol. 2022 Jul;9(3):253-262
pubmed: 36035346
World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2359-2366
pubmed: 31776737
World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):303-313
pubmed: 33811291
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Jul;7(4):669-671
pubmed: 34417152
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Nov;30(6):754-781
pubmed: 32941257
Eur Radiol. 2023 Jun 8;:
pubmed: 37289245
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1401-1409
pubmed: 36689078
World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3465-3471
pubmed: 33538866
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8533-8548
pubmed: 35941310
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1625-1633
pubmed: 29134348
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;124(2):221-230
pubmed: 34245578
Urol Oncol. 2021 Jul;39(7):379-399
pubmed: 34024704
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Jun;18(3):e2387
pubmed: 35246913
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Nov-Dec;7(11-12):430-4
pubmed: 24381662
Arch Esp Urol. 2018 Jan;71(1):97-107
pubmed: 29336338
World J Urol. 2020 Oct;38(10):2329-2347
pubmed: 31691082
Database (Oxford). 2020 Jan 1;2020:
pubmed: 32016318
Eur Urol. 2022 Oct;82(4):399-410
pubmed: 35346519
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 01;109(2):174-200
pubmed: 34285662
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 10;369(15):1434-42
pubmed: 24106936
Scand J Urol. 2014 Jun;48(3):231-8
pubmed: 24666102
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3732-3740
pubmed: 30790048
Eur Urol. 2023 Jul;84(1):86-91
pubmed: 36941148
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):93-105
pubmed: 26935559
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4058-4066
pubmed: 28281111
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Apr 12;5(1):48
pubmed: 35413988
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 26;10(9):
pubmed: 33925767
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 15;11:724986
pubmed: 34868918
Med Image Anal. 2015 Oct;25(1):103-10
pubmed: 25977157
JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):770-771
pubmed: 29926095
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17(Pt 1):407-14
pubmed: 25333144
J Endourol. 2020 Jun;34(6):692-699
pubmed: 31886708
J Urol. 2016 Feb;195(2):486-92
pubmed: 26321408
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Nov;31(11):2169-82
pubmed: 22899573
Ulster Med J. 2012 Sep;81(3):107-13
pubmed: 23620606
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2155-2165
pubmed: 27604368
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Nov;30(6):817-822
pubmed: 33009150
BJU Int. 2020 Jun;125(6):761-762
pubmed: 32160392
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Jul;36(7):1542-1549
pubmed: 28186883
Urology. 2019 Mar;125:104-110
pubmed: 30597165
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):505-512
pubmed: 30904340
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jul;8(7):2328-2331
pubmed: 31463251
Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3830-3838
pubmed: 29435758
Lancet. 2014 Nov 1;384(9954):1562-3
pubmed: 25473669
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2149008
pubmed: 35191972
Curr Urol Rep. 2021 Oct 8;22(10):51
pubmed: 34622373
J Nephrol. 2021 Jun;34(3):689-697
pubmed: 32876939
3D Print Med. 2019 Feb 19;5(1):4
pubmed: 30783869
Int J Surg. 2021 Nov;95:106151
pubmed: 34695601
Ann Surg. 2005 Feb;241(2):364-72
pubmed: 15650649
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Aug;14(8):1285-1294
pubmed: 31016562
Asian J Urol. 2022 Jul;9(3):243-252
pubmed: 36035341
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 7;13(1):5728
pubmed: 37029115
Urology. 2019 Mar;125:92-97
pubmed: 30597166
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(20):e764
pubmed: 25997044
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Aug;11(8):1409-18
pubmed: 26872810
BJU Int. 2019 Sep;124(3):487-495
pubmed: 30811828
Urol Int. 2019;102(2):212-217
pubmed: 30540991