Effects of Different Container Types on (1→3)-β-D-glucan Recovery.
(1→3)-β-D-glucan
SHT
container effect
freeze/thaw
sample hold time
spike recovery
Journal
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1420-3049
Titre abrégé: Molecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100964009
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Oct 2023
04 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
30
08
2023
revised:
22
09
2023
accepted:
29
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
14
10
2023
entrez:
14
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It has long been known that containers for sample analysis or storage can play a role in endotoxin recovery and have to be taken into account when determining endotoxin concentrations. However, there is little data on the effects of containers regarding (1→3)-β-D-glucan, which plays a role as a contaminant in endotoxin measurements. To determine the effect of the container on (1→3)-β-D-glucan measurements, four different types of containers were investigated at different temperatures and stored for up to 28 days. For short-term storage for 3 h at room temperature, no effect of the container on the (1→3)-β-D-glucan recovery could be observed, but for storage at -20 °C, the results indicate that the storage time and temperature influences (1→3)-β-D-glucan detection. All containers showed a trend of lower recoveries over time, but the polyethylene container showed a significantly lower recovery compared to the other containers. We also showed that freeze/thaw cycles had a strong influence on the recovery of (1→3)-β-D-glucan in polyethylene containers. Our study showed that the container can affect not only the detection of endotoxins but also the detection of (1→3)-β-D-glucans.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37836774
pii: molecules28196931
doi: 10.3390/molecules28196931
pmc: PMC10574291
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glucans
0
beta-Glucans
0
Endotoxins
0
Polyethylenes
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 1;41(5):654-9
pubmed: 16080087
Microorganisms. 2020 Mar 16;8(3):
pubmed: 32188126
J Biochem. 1993 Jun;113(6):683-6
pubmed: 8370664
Biologicals. 2018 May;53:1-9
pubmed: 29685804
Cancer Res. 2003 Dec 15;63(24):9023-31
pubmed: 14695221
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Dec;100(6):1413-21
pubmed: 25411276
Carbohydr Res. 2000 Sep 22;328(3):331-41
pubmed: 11072840
J Immunol. 2006 Aug 1;177(3):1661-9
pubmed: 16849475
Molecules. 2020 Jul 24;25(15):
pubmed: 32722261
J Fungi (Basel). 2020 Dec 10;6(4):
pubmed: 33322069
Biotechnol Prog. 2016 Nov;32(6):1494-1502
pubmed: 27604040
Int J Oncol. 2013 Aug;43(2):357-64
pubmed: 23739801
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Nov;29(11):2477-83
pubmed: 1774252
J Immunotoxicol. 2008 Jan;5(1):47-57
pubmed: 18382858
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2016 Nov;65(11):1289-1301
pubmed: 27473075
J Parenter Sci Technol. 1986 Nov-Dec;40(6):284-6
pubmed: 3819982
J Hematol Oncol. 2009 Jun 10;2:25
pubmed: 19515245
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Apr;71(4):913-5
pubmed: 26668235
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2001 Jul;25(5-6):1001-7
pubmed: 11377085
Glycobiology. 2000 Apr;10(4):339-46
pubmed: 10764821
Molecules. 2015 May 27;20(6):9745-66
pubmed: 26023937
Biologicals. 2016 Sep;44(5):417-22
pubmed: 27464990
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jul 01;9:905797
pubmed: 35847628