Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chemo Brain.
chemo brain
chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment
transcranial magnetic stimulation
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Sep 2023
22 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
07
07
2023
revised:
04
09
2023
accepted:
18
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
14
10
2023
entrez:
14
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This pilot feasibility study aimed to evaluate the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), and we report here on the first patient. Deleterious cognitive changes due to chemotherapy or CRCI are commonly referred to as "chemo brain". With the increasing survival of cancer patients, this poorly understood and inadequately treated condition will likewise have an increasing toll on individuals and society. Since there is no approved treatment for chemo brain, we have initiated a therapeutic trial using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique approved in many countries for the treatment of neurologic and psychiatric conditions like migraine and depression. A 58-year-old woman, diagnosed 7 years prior with left breast cancer, underwent partial mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy. She then received four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy. Afterwards, she was on tamoxifen for 4 years and then switched to aromatase inhibitors. The patient's CRCI started during chemotherapy and severely impaired her quality of life for an additional two years. In the third year after chemotherapy, the CRCI partially cleared to stabilize to the level at the time of presentation for this trial. The patient continues to have memory difficulties and decreased concentration, which makes multi-tasking very difficult to impossible. She is reliant on memory aids at work and at home. The participant underwent 10 consecutive sessions of TMS during weekdays for 2 weeks. Stimulation was directed to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. After TMS, the participant significantly improved in memory function on neuropsychological testing. While she reported no subjective differences in concentration or memory, she did report an improvement in her sleep. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain before and after TMS showed increased resting-state functional connectivity between the stimulation site and several brain regions. Remarkably, after 6 years of chemo brain and remaining in the same position at work due to her inability to concentrate and multi-task, she applied for and received a promotion 5-6 months after her TMS treatments. This first patient in the phase 1 clinical trial testing of TMS for the treatment of "chemo brain" provided important lessons for feasibility and insights into mechanisms of potential benefit.
Sections du résumé
This pilot feasibility study aimed to evaluate the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), and we report here on the first patient.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Deleterious cognitive changes due to chemotherapy or CRCI are commonly referred to as "chemo brain". With the increasing survival of cancer patients, this poorly understood and inadequately treated condition will likewise have an increasing toll on individuals and society. Since there is no approved treatment for chemo brain, we have initiated a therapeutic trial using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique approved in many countries for the treatment of neurologic and psychiatric conditions like migraine and depression.
CASE PRESENTATION
METHODS
A 58-year-old woman, diagnosed 7 years prior with left breast cancer, underwent partial mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy. She then received four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy. Afterwards, she was on tamoxifen for 4 years and then switched to aromatase inhibitors. The patient's CRCI started during chemotherapy and severely impaired her quality of life for an additional two years. In the third year after chemotherapy, the CRCI partially cleared to stabilize to the level at the time of presentation for this trial. The patient continues to have memory difficulties and decreased concentration, which makes multi-tasking very difficult to impossible. She is reliant on memory aids at work and at home. The participant underwent 10 consecutive sessions of TMS during weekdays for 2 weeks. Stimulation was directed to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. After TMS, the participant significantly improved in memory function on neuropsychological testing. While she reported no subjective differences in concentration or memory, she did report an improvement in her sleep. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain before and after TMS showed increased resting-state functional connectivity between the stimulation site and several brain regions. Remarkably, after 6 years of chemo brain and remaining in the same position at work due to her inability to concentrate and multi-task, she applied for and received a promotion 5-6 months after her TMS treatments.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This first patient in the phase 1 clinical trial testing of TMS for the treatment of "chemo brain" provided important lessons for feasibility and insights into mechanisms of potential benefit.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37836847
pii: s23198017
doi: 10.3390/s23198017
pmc: PMC10575384
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG062543
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS102220
Pays : United States
Références
Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 Mar;7(3):192-201
pubmed: 17318212
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Jul;21(7):974-984
pubmed: 29892048
Ageing Res Rev. 2016 Aug;29:66-89
pubmed: 27221544
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528
pubmed: 31901449
Brain Stimul. 2015 Sep-Oct;8(5):965-73
pubmed: 26115776
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 May;17(5):368-75
pubmed: 19390294
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;678:21-5
pubmed: 20738003
Oncologist. 2008 Dec;13(12):1285-95
pubmed: 19019972
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10;30(20):2500-8
pubmed: 22665542
Prog Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb 28;8:20230004
pubmed: 36861061
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Oct;123(3):819-28
pubmed: 20690040
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 2;106:110168
pubmed: 33166668
Behav Neurol. 2004;15(3-4):99-107
pubmed: 15706053
Autism. 2021 Jul;25(5):1279-1294
pubmed: 33631943
Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):466-75
pubmed: 15274059
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Apr;72(4):432-40
pubmed: 25686212
Brain Imaging Behav. 2013 Dec;7(4):524-32
pubmed: 23852814
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 28;12(11):e050590
pubmed: 36442900
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Mar;32(3):324-31
pubmed: 19642048
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):72
pubmed: 33553365
Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):201-6
pubmed: 15664172
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;21:101654
pubmed: 30642760
Neuroradiol J. 2017 Aug;30(4):305-317
pubmed: 28353416
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Oct;28(4):373-80
pubmed: 15471655
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;62(4):220-41
pubmed: 22700443
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(15):16231-16242
pubmed: 37409628
Brain Connect. 2012;2(3):125-41
pubmed: 22642651
Radiology. 2021 Oct;301(1):185-186
pubmed: 34282973
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012 Jun;12(3):267-75
pubmed: 22453825
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Nov;15(6):951-62
pubmed: 19709455
J Cancer Surviv. 2009 Dec;3(4):223-32
pubmed: 19760150
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jan;36(1):479-501
pubmed: 21889953
Brain. 2008 Nov;131(Pt 11):2812-23
pubmed: 18567924
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Nov;238(11):3025-3053
pubmed: 34643772
Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jan;132(1):269-306
pubmed: 33243615
J ECT. 2006 Sep;22(3):169-75
pubmed: 16957531
Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Oct;14(5):1456-1467
pubmed: 30877468
Brain Sci. 2019 Jul 26;9(8):
pubmed: 31357468
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 17;11:685605
pubmed: 34222010
Med Res Rev. 2023 Jun 2;:
pubmed: 37265248
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 28;13:750507
pubmed: 35418856
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116189
pubmed: 31521825
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 2;39(1):3-14
pubmed: 30389839
Brain Struct Funct. 2023 May;228(3-4):717-749
pubmed: 37072625
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18(9):838-851
pubmed: 32091339
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Feb 1;40(2):608-627
pubmed: 30251765
Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2003 Oct;8(4):201-16
pubmed: 14613048
Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 15;12(7):
pubmed: 35884734
Neuropharmacology. 2013 Jan;64:579-87
pubmed: 22687520
Neurobiol Aging. 2020 Feb;86:1-10
pubmed: 31783330
Brain. 2007 Jul;130(Pt 7):1718-31
pubmed: 17392317
Front Neurosci. 2019 Nov 12;13:1099
pubmed: 31780878
Neurobiol Dis. 2012 Dec;48(3):329-38
pubmed: 22820143
Brain. 2014 Jan;137(Pt 1):12-32
pubmed: 23869106
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002 Apr;24(2):214-20
pubmed: 11992204
Lancet. 1985 May 11;1(8437):1106-7
pubmed: 2860322
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jan;41(1):126-39
pubmed: 20832978
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Jul;103(3):303-11
pubmed: 17009108
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2012 Feb;14(1):23-9
pubmed: 22068509
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;678:33-6
pubmed: 20738005