Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsies: 2-year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (PRECISE).

Magnetic resonance imaging Prostate cancer diagnosis Randomized trial Targeted biopsy

Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 07 06 2023
revised: 16 08 2023
accepted: 11 09 2023
medline: 15 10 2023
pubmed: 15 10 2023
entrez: 14 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The prospective randomized PRECISE trial demonstrated that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with only targeted biopsy (TBx) was noninferior to systematic transrectal ultrasound biopsy (SBx) in the detection of International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (GG) ≥2 prostate cancer (PC). An unanswered question is the outcome for patients who avoided a biopsy because of negative MRI findings. To explore the rate of PC diagnosis based on 2-yr MRI for PRECISE participants who had no biopsy and for patients who had a negative result or GG 1 on TBx in comparison to those with a negative result or GG 1 on SBx. The PRECISE prospective trial was conducted at five Canadian academic centers. The present analysis was for trial participants who were not diagnosed with clinically significant PC (csPC) at baseline. Of 453 randomized patients, 146 were diagnosed with GG ≥2 at baseline and were excluded. Eligible patients for this study included 83 men from the MRI arm who had negative MRI findings and no biopsy, 120 from the overall cohort who had a negative SBx or TBx, and 72 from the overall cohort who were diagnosed with GG 1 disease. MRI at 2 yr in all men in the MRI and SBx arms and TBx for lesions with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score of ≥3 or on the basis of clinical suspicion. The primary outcome was the proportion of men diagnosed with GG ≥2 cancer. Secondary outcomes included the MRI outcome and the proportion of men diagnosed with GG 1 PC. Evaluable 2-yr MRI scans were available for 75 (56%) eligible patients in the MRI arm and 69 (49%) in the SBx arm. Of these patients, 55 (73%) in the MRI arm and 51 (67%) SBx arm had negative 2-yr MRI. Of the 76 patients in the SBx arm with 2-yr MRI, 16 (21%) had a biopsy, for which the result was negative in eight (10%), GG1 in two (2.6%), and GG ≥2 in six (7.9%) cases. Of the 75 men in the MRI arm with 2-yr MRI, eight (11%) were biopsied, for which the result was negative in four cases (5%) and GG ≥2 in the other four (5%). At 2 yr, including baseline biopsy results, 116/221 (52.5%) in the MRI arm and 113/204 (55%) in the SBx arm were free of GG ≥2 disease, treatment, death from any cause, or progression (OR 1.08; p = 0.66). After 2-yr follow-up including MRI for patients in both arms of PRECISE, there was no difference in the rate of csPC diagnosis between the MRI and SBx groups, even though 38% of men in the MRI group avoided an initial biopsy. The PRECISE trial compared systematic biopsy of the prostate to a strategy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with targeted biopsy of any lesions suspicious for cancer on the scan. After 2 years of follow-up that included 2-year MRI with or without biopsy in both groups, there was no difference in the rate of diagnosis of significant cancer, even though 38% of men in the initial MRI arm avoided an initial biopsy, and 30% avoided biopsy altogether. The PRECISE trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02936258.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The prospective randomized PRECISE trial demonstrated that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with only targeted biopsy (TBx) was noninferior to systematic transrectal ultrasound biopsy (SBx) in the detection of International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (GG) ≥2 prostate cancer (PC). An unanswered question is the outcome for patients who avoided a biopsy because of negative MRI findings.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To explore the rate of PC diagnosis based on 2-yr MRI for PRECISE participants who had no biopsy and for patients who had a negative result or GG 1 on TBx in comparison to those with a negative result or GG 1 on SBx.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS METHODS
The PRECISE prospective trial was conducted at five Canadian academic centers. The present analysis was for trial participants who were not diagnosed with clinically significant PC (csPC) at baseline. Of 453 randomized patients, 146 were diagnosed with GG ≥2 at baseline and were excluded. Eligible patients for this study included 83 men from the MRI arm who had negative MRI findings and no biopsy, 120 from the overall cohort who had a negative SBx or TBx, and 72 from the overall cohort who were diagnosed with GG 1 disease.
INTERVENTION METHODS
MRI at 2 yr in all men in the MRI and SBx arms and TBx for lesions with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score of ≥3 or on the basis of clinical suspicion.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS
The primary outcome was the proportion of men diagnosed with GG ≥2 cancer. Secondary outcomes included the MRI outcome and the proportion of men diagnosed with GG 1 PC.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Evaluable 2-yr MRI scans were available for 75 (56%) eligible patients in the MRI arm and 69 (49%) in the SBx arm. Of these patients, 55 (73%) in the MRI arm and 51 (67%) SBx arm had negative 2-yr MRI. Of the 76 patients in the SBx arm with 2-yr MRI, 16 (21%) had a biopsy, for which the result was negative in eight (10%), GG1 in two (2.6%), and GG ≥2 in six (7.9%) cases. Of the 75 men in the MRI arm with 2-yr MRI, eight (11%) were biopsied, for which the result was negative in four cases (5%) and GG ≥2 in the other four (5%). At 2 yr, including baseline biopsy results, 116/221 (52.5%) in the MRI arm and 113/204 (55%) in the SBx arm were free of GG ≥2 disease, treatment, death from any cause, or progression (OR 1.08; p = 0.66).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
After 2-yr follow-up including MRI for patients in both arms of PRECISE, there was no difference in the rate of csPC diagnosis between the MRI and SBx groups, even though 38% of men in the MRI group avoided an initial biopsy.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
The PRECISE trial compared systematic biopsy of the prostate to a strategy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with targeted biopsy of any lesions suspicious for cancer on the scan. After 2 years of follow-up that included 2-year MRI with or without biopsy in both groups, there was no difference in the rate of diagnosis of significant cancer, even though 38% of men in the initial MRI arm avoided an initial biopsy, and 30% avoided biopsy altogether. The PRECISE trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02936258.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37838556
pii: S2588-9311(23)00204-3
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.013
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02936258']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Laurence Klotz (L)

Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: laurence.klotz@sunnybrook.ca.

Joseph Chin (J)

London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Peter C Black (PC)

Vancouver Prostate Centre, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Antonio Finelli (A)

Princess Margaret Hospital, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Maurice Anidjar (M)

Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Ashley Machado (A)

Vancouver Prostate Centre, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Mark Levental (M)

Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Sangeet Ghai (S)

Princess Margaret Hospital, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Silvia D Chang (SD)

Vancouver Prostate Centre, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Chirag Patel (C)

Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Zahra Kassam (Z)

London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Andrew Loblaw (A)

Princess Margaret Hospital, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Marlene Kebabdjian (M)

Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Greg Pond (G)

Department of Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Masoom A Haider (MA)

Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Classifications MeSH