Impact of Bowel Coverage and Resuscitation Protocol on Gastroschisis Mortality in Low-Income Countries: Experience and Lessons From Uganda.

Capacity building Gastroschisis Global surgery Health disparities

Journal

Journal of pediatric surgery
ISSN: 1531-5037
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0052631

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 14 08 2023
accepted: 06 09 2023
medline: 15 10 2023
pubmed: 15 10 2023
entrez: 14 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Gastroschisis causes near complete mortality in low-income countries (LICs). This study seeks to understand the impact of bedside bowel reduction and silo placement, and protocolized resuscitation on gastroschisis outcomes in LICs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of gastroschisis patients at a tertiary referral center in Kampala, Uganda. Multiple approaches for bedside application of bowel coverage devices and delayed closure were used: sutured urine bags (2017-2018), improvised silos using wound protectors (2020-2021), and spring-loaded silos (2022). Total parental nutrition (TPN) was not available; however, with the use of improvised silos, a protocol was implemented to include protocolized resuscitation and early enteral feeding. Risk ratios (RR) for mortality were calculated in comparison to historic controls from 2014. 368 patients were included: 42 historic controls, 7 primary closures, 81 sutured urine bags, 133 improvised silos and 105 spring-loaded silos. No differences were found in sex (p = 0.31), days to presentation (p = 0.84), and distance traveled to the tertiary hospital (p = 0.16). Following the introduction of bowel coverage methods, the proportion of infants that survived to discharge increased from 2% to 16-29%. In comparison to historic controls, the risk of mortality significantly decreased: sutured urine bags 0.65 (95%CI: 0.52-0.80), improvised silo 0.76 (0.66-0.87), and spring-loaded silo 0.65 (0.56-0.76). Bedside application of bowel coverage and protocolization decreases the risk of death for infants with gastroschisis, even in the absence of TPN. Further efforts to expand supply of low-cost silos in LICs would significantly decrease the mortality associated with gastroschisis in this setting. Treatment Study. III (Retrospective Comparative Study).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Gastroschisis causes near complete mortality in low-income countries (LICs). This study seeks to understand the impact of bedside bowel reduction and silo placement, and protocolized resuscitation on gastroschisis outcomes in LICs.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of gastroschisis patients at a tertiary referral center in Kampala, Uganda. Multiple approaches for bedside application of bowel coverage devices and delayed closure were used: sutured urine bags (2017-2018), improvised silos using wound protectors (2020-2021), and spring-loaded silos (2022). Total parental nutrition (TPN) was not available; however, with the use of improvised silos, a protocol was implemented to include protocolized resuscitation and early enteral feeding. Risk ratios (RR) for mortality were calculated in comparison to historic controls from 2014.
RESULTS RESULTS
368 patients were included: 42 historic controls, 7 primary closures, 81 sutured urine bags, 133 improvised silos and 105 spring-loaded silos. No differences were found in sex (p = 0.31), days to presentation (p = 0.84), and distance traveled to the tertiary hospital (p = 0.16). Following the introduction of bowel coverage methods, the proportion of infants that survived to discharge increased from 2% to 16-29%. In comparison to historic controls, the risk of mortality significantly decreased: sutured urine bags 0.65 (95%CI: 0.52-0.80), improvised silo 0.76 (0.66-0.87), and spring-loaded silo 0.65 (0.56-0.76).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Bedside application of bowel coverage and protocolization decreases the risk of death for infants with gastroschisis, even in the absence of TPN. Further efforts to expand supply of low-cost silos in LICs would significantly decrease the mortality associated with gastroschisis in this setting.
TYPE OF STUDY METHODS
Treatment Study.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE METHODS
III (Retrospective Comparative Study).

Identifiants

pubmed: 37838617
pii: S0022-3468(23)00552-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.09.015
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Stella A Nimanya (SA)

Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

Caroline Q Stephens (CQ)

UCSF Center for Health Equity and Anesthesia, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: caroline.stephens2@ucsf.edu.

Ava Yap (A)

UCSF Center for Health Equity and Anesthesia, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Phyllis Kisa (P)

Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.

Nasser Kakembo (N)

Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.

Anne Wesonga (A)

Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

Innocent Okello (I)

Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

Rovine Naluyimbazi (R)

Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

Fiona Mbwali (F)

Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

Peter Kayima (P)

Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

Yasin Ssewanyana (Y)

Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

Bindi Naik-Mathuria (B)

University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Doruk Ozgediz (D)

UCSF Center for Health Equity and Anesthesia, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

John Sekabira (J)

Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

Classifications MeSH