Diagnostic accuracy of the video otoscope in tympanic membrane perforation.

Otorhinolaryngology Otoscopy Tympanic membrane perforation

Journal

Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
ISSN: 1808-8686
Titre abrégé: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101207337

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 03 05 2023
revised: 03 07 2023
accepted: 22 09 2023
medline: 16 10 2023
pubmed: 16 10 2023
entrez: 15 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The video otoscope has already proven to be useful for the diagnosis of several pathologies, so the objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the video otoscope in cases of tympanic membrane perforation. This is a diagnostic accuracy study performed at the hearing health division of a tertiary-level referral hospital. Patients older than 8 years of age who had any symptom that could be related to perforation (otalgia, otorrhea, tinnitus, and/or hypoacusis) were invited to participate in the study. Participants were evaluated by three different diagnostic methods (otomicroscope, conventional otoscope, and video otoscope) performed by three different evaluators in a blind fashion. The microscope was considered the reference standard. 176 patients were evaluated, totaling 352 tympanic membranes. Twenty-seven tympanic membrane perforations were diagnosed by the microscope, a prevalence of 7.7%. The video otoscope showed a sensitivity of 85.2% (95% CI 81.5%‒88.9%), specificity of 98.1% (95% CI 96.7%‒99.5%) and accuracy of 97.1% (95% CI 95.4 %-98.8 %). The conventional otoscope showed a sensitivity of 96.3% (95% CI 94.3-98.3), specificity of 98.8% (95% CI 97.7-99.9) and accuracy of 98.6% (95% CI 97.4-99.8). The Kappa value between the microscope and the video otoscope was 0.8 and between the microscope and the conventional otoscope was 0.9. Regarding the participants' perception, 53.4% (p< 0.001) considered the video otoscope as the best method for understanding the tympanic membrane condition presented by them. The video otoscope showed relevant sensitivity and specificity for clinical practice in the diagnosis of tympanic membrane perforation. Moreover, this is an equipment that can facilitate the patient's understanding of the otologic pathology presented by him/her. In this regard, this method may be important for better patient compliance, requiring further studies to evaluate this hypothesis. Is this diagnostic or monitoring test accurate? (Diagnosis)-Level 2 (Individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding).

Identifiants

pubmed: 37839169
pii: S1808-8694(23)00104-0
doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101336
pmc: PMC10582057
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101336

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier España S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Références

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Apr;75(4):527-31
pubmed: 21257210
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2016 Aug;55(9):800-10
pubmed: 26156976
Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;10(2):409-424
pubmed: 29749042
Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;43(1):31-38
pubmed: 28485038
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 May-Jun;42(3):102928
pubmed: 33545447
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar;156(3):554-558
pubmed: 28118550
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Jul 24;13:927-931
pubmed: 28769569
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jun;73(6):825-8
pubmed: 19307026
Am J Otolaryngol. 2012 Sep-Oct;33(5):549-55
pubmed: 22365389
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;276(10):2953-2956
pubmed: 31317322
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Apr 1;147(4):336-342
pubmed: 33475683
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jun;278(6):1799-1804
pubmed: 32960350
J Laryngol Otol. 2009 Jan;123(1):e2
pubmed: 18940030
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):295-301
pubmed: 19150199
Ghana Med J. 2018 Mar;52(1):34-40
pubmed: 30013259
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Aug;24(7):453-459
pubmed: 28480781
J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2 Suppl):S174-8; discussion S178
pubmed: 18376162
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2019 Feb;136(1):13-17
pubmed: 30392875
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;36(10):1796-1801
pubmed: 29544905
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar;106:59-63
pubmed: 29447893
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021 Feb;130(2):125-132
pubmed: 32627572
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Dec;34(6):526-32
pubmed: 20070761
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):1089-92
pubmed: 25979304
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;21(8):1044-1049
pubmed: 30074009
Laryngoscope. 2021 Apr;131(4):744-759
pubmed: 32942340

Auteurs

Leonardo Resende de Sousa (LR)

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Curso Médico, Bauru, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: leoresende@usp.br.

Guilherme Adam Fraga (GA)

Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Bauru, SP, Brazil.

Igor Souza Pessoa da Costa (ISPD)

Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Bauru, SP, Brazil.

Ana Claudia Ferreira de Almeida (ACF)

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Curso Médico, Bauru, SP, Brazil.

Tyuana Sandim da Silveira Sassi (TSDS)

Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Bauru, SP, Brazil.

Luiz Fernando Manzoni Lourençone (LFM)

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Curso Médico, Bauru, SP, Brazil; Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Bauru, SP, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH