Communicating climate change and biodiversity loss with local populations: exploring communicative utopias in eight transdisciplinary case studies.
biodiversity loss
climate change
knowledge co-production
local communities
local knowledge
postcolonial moments
transdisciplinary communication
Journal
UCL open. Environment
ISSN: 2632-0886
Titre abrégé: UCL Open Environ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101771734
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
18
07
2022
accepted:
03
08
2023
medline:
16
10
2023
pubmed:
16
10
2023
entrez:
16
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Climate change and biodiversity loss trigger policies targeting and impacting local communities worldwide. However, research and policy implementation often fail to sufficiently consider community responses and to involve them. We present the results of a collective self-assessment exercise for eight case studies of communications with regard to climate change or biodiversity loss between project teams and local communities. We develop eight indicators of good stakeholder communication, reflecting the scope of Verran's (2002) concept of postcolonial moments as a communicative utopia. We demonstrate that applying our indicators can enhance communication and enable community responses. However, we discover a divergence between timing, complexity and (introspective) effort. Three cases qualify for postcolonial moments, but scrutinising power relations and genuine knowledge co-production remain rare. While we verify the potency of various instruments for deconstructing science, their sophistication cannot substitute trust building and epistemic/transdisciplinary awareness. Lastly, we consider that reforming inadequate funding policies helps improving the work in and with local communities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37840556
doi: 10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000064
pmc: PMC10571513
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e064Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Research ethics statementNot applicable to this article.Consent for publication statementThe authors declare that research participants’ informed consent to publication of findings – including photos, videos and any personal or identifiable information – was secured prior to publication.Conflicts of interest statementThe authors declare no conflicts of interest with this work.The authors declare no conflicts of interest with this work.
Références
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012 Aug;87(3):661-85
pubmed: 22272640
UCL Open Environ. 2021 Nov 02;3:e028
pubmed: 37228793
Ambio. 2019 Jul;48(7):699-713
pubmed: 30448995
Conserv Biol. 2017 Oct;31(5):1008-1017
pubmed: 28225163
Conserv Biol. 2021 Jun;35(3):1019-1028
pubmed: 32996235
J Environ Manage. 2020 Aug 1;267:110594
pubmed: 32349949
Environ Sci Policy. 2019 Nov;101:16-23
pubmed: 31762690
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3:14033-9
pubmed: 23942125
Ambio. 2015 Apr;44(3):249-55
pubmed: 25238981