Effects of postural threat on the scaling of anticipatory postural adjustments in young and older adults.
aging
anticipatory postural adjustment
balance control
center of pressure
electromyography
postural threat
Journal
Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
26
07
2023
accepted:
14
09
2023
medline:
16
10
2023
pubmed:
16
10
2023
entrez:
16
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The ability to scale anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) according to the predicted size of the upcoming movement is reduced with aging. While age-related changes in central set may be one reason for this effect, an individual's emotional state might also contribute to changes in anticipatory postural control. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether an altered emotional state, as elicited through postural threat, alters the scaling of APAs during a handle pull movement in young and older adults. It was hypothesized that the presence of postural threat would lead to more homogenous APAs (i.e., less scaling of APAs) across a range of pulling forces. Young ( As evidenced by their smaller slope of the regression line between various dependent measures (i.e., COP velocity, soleus EMG onset latency, and soleus EMG amplitude) and the pulled forces, older adults demonstrated less scaling of APAs than the young. However, increases in arousal, anxiety and fear of falling due to postural threat, only minimally altered the scaling of APAs. Regardless of age, the slope of the regressions for none of the measures were affected by threat while only the soleus and medial gastrocnemius EMG onsets demonstrated significant force × threat interaction effects. These results suggest that the decreased ability to scale APAs with aging is unlikely to be due to changes in emotional state.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37841075
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1267093
pmc: PMC10568077
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1267093Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Phanthanourak, Adkin, Carpenter and Tokuno.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 29;29(30):9450-7
pubmed: 19641108
Gait Posture. 2006 Dec;24(4):397-405
pubmed: 17055728
Gait Posture. 2012 Feb;35(2):282-6
pubmed: 22024142
Age Ageing. 2006 May;35(3):298-303
pubmed: 16638771
Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Oct;73:102674
pubmed: 32829121
Exp Brain Res. 1998 May;120(1):85-94
pubmed: 9628406
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012 Feb;67(2):196-203
pubmed: 21948599
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Mar;143(2):160-70
pubmed: 11880892
Neurophysiol Clin. 2008 Dec;38(6):345-62
pubmed: 19026956
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1997;57(1):49-57
pubmed: 9407691
Clin Interv Aging. 2012;7:65-75
pubmed: 22423179
Prog Neurobiol. 1992;38(1):35-56
pubmed: 1736324
Exp Brain Res. 1990;82(2):304-14
pubmed: 2286233
Gait Posture. 2016 Oct;50:145-150
pubmed: 27611062
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Aug;145(3):286-96
pubmed: 12136378
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015 Dec;25(6):966-72
pubmed: 26403099
Gait Posture. 2000 Oct;12(2):87-93
pubmed: 10998604
Exp Gerontol. 2019 Jul 15;122:109-115
pubmed: 31028840
Aging (Milano). 1994 Oct;6(5):323-33
pubmed: 7893778
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jun;150(3):385-94
pubmed: 12707746
J Gerontol. 1988 Jul;43(4):M105-13
pubmed: 3385142
Neurobiol Aging. 1989 Nov-Dec;10(6):727-38
pubmed: 2697808
Brain Res Bull. 2006 Apr 14;69(3):294-305
pubmed: 16564425
Neuroscience. 2020 Jul 1;438:41-49
pubmed: 32407974
J Neurophysiol. 1982 Feb;47(2):287-302
pubmed: 7062101
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Jun;117(6):1165-1174
pubmed: 28409395
Gait Posture. 2009 Feb;29(2):275-9
pubmed: 18963992
Gait Posture. 2006 Oct;24(2):203-10
pubmed: 16213140
Neurosci Lett. 1990 Sep 4;117(1-2):188-93
pubmed: 2290615