Health and economic outcomes of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared to 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine strategies for adults in Greece.
Greece
PCV15
PCV20
pneumococcal conjugate vaccines
pneumococcal disease
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
26
05
2023
accepted:
18
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
16
10
2023
entrez:
16
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Higher valency pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) are expected to improve protection against pneumococcal disease through coverage of additional serotypes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) compared to 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15) alone or followed by 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) for adults in Greece. A published Markov model was adapted to simulate lifetime risk of clinical and economic outcomes from the public payer's perspective. The model population was stratified based on age and risk profile (i.e., low, moderate, or high-risk of developing pneumococcal disease). Epidemiologic parameters, serotype coverage and vaccines' effectiveness were based on published literature, while direct medical costs (prices €, 2022) were obtained from official sources. Main model outcomes were projected number of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and all-cause non-bacteremic pneumonia (NBP) cases and attributable deaths, costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) for each vaccination strategy. Sensitivity analyses were performed to ascertain the robustness of model results. Over the modeled time horizon, vaccination with PCV20 compared to PCV15 alone or PCV15 followed by PPV23 prevents an additional 747 and 646 cases of IPD, 10,334 and 10,342 cases of NBP and 468 and 455 deaths respectively, resulting in incremental gain of 1,594 and 1,536 QALYs and cost savings of €11,183 and €48,858, respectively. PSA revealed that the probability of PCV20 being cost-effective at the predetermined threshold of €34,000 per QALY gained was 100% compared to either PCV15 alone or the combination of PCV15 followed by PPV23. PCV20 is estimated to improve public health by averting additional pneumococcal disease cases and deaths relative to PCV15 alone or followed by PPV23, and therefore translates to cost-savings for the public payer. Overall results showed that vaccination with PCV20 was estimated to be a dominant vaccination strategy (improved health outcomes with reduced costs) over PCV15 alone or followed by PPV23 for prevention of pneumococcal disease in adults in Greece.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37841729
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1229524
pmc: PMC10570410
doi:
Substances chimiques
Vaccines, Conjugate
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1229524Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Gourzoulidis, Barmpouni, Kossyvaki, Vietri and Tzanetakos.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MB and VK were employed by Pfizer Hellas. JV was employed by Pfizer Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Infect Chemother. 2018 Dec;50(4):328-339
pubmed: 30600656
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):812-22
pubmed: 20200385
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):373-381
pubmed: 23498103
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;10(12):
pubmed: 36560441
Pneumonia (Nathan). 2022 Sep 25;14(1):5
pubmed: 36153636
Value Health Reg Issues. 2023 Jul;36:18-26
pubmed: 37004314
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Feb 15;19(1):21
pubmed: 33588876
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 17;138(12):960-8
pubmed: 12809452
Eur Respir J. 2015 Nov;46(5):1407-16
pubmed: 26160871
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e1489-e1497
pubmed: 32716500
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 31;75(3):390-398
pubmed: 34940806
Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Apr;41(4):371-380
pubmed: 33687695
Vaccine. 2021 Sep 7;39(38):5428-5435
pubmed: 34315611
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1447828
pubmed: 29564962
PLoS One. 2017 May 23;12(5):e0177985
pubmed: 28542347
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 May;36(5):509-522
pubmed: 29427072
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jan 02;6:42-50
pubmed: 31193709
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2079923
pubmed: 35703733
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Dec;22(8):1285-1295
pubmed: 36225103
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):208
pubmed: 28292280
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jun;111(6):1049-1054
pubmed: 33856880
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Mar;22(2):259-269
pubmed: 33900864
Vaccine. 2021 Oct 15;39(43):6422-6436
pubmed: 34489128
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):929-935
pubmed: 27987642
Microorganisms. 2022 Mar 04;10(3):
pubmed: 35336135
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):901-8
pubmed: 26976292
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 3;40(1):162-172
pubmed: 34507861
Eur Respir Rev. 2012 Mar 1;21(123):57-65
pubmed: 22379175
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 28;71(4):109-117
pubmed: 35085226
N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 2;349(14):1341-8
pubmed: 14523142
Vaccine. 2021 Dec 17;39(51):7494-7502
pubmed: 34839993
PLoS One. 2017 May 12;12(5):e0177342
pubmed: 28498857
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 30;11(1):24534
pubmed: 34969968
Vaccine. 2004 Oct 22;22(31-32):4203-14
pubmed: 15474710
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):1240-1254
pubmed: 36426797
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60273
pubmed: 23565216
J Mol Med (Berl). 2010 Feb;88(2):103-7
pubmed: 20162252
Vaccine. 2022 Jun 26;40(30):4008-4016
pubmed: 35618559
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Aug;11(4):1683-1693
pubmed: 35831685
Vaccine. 2011 Apr 18;29(18):3398-412
pubmed: 21397721
Vaccine. 2022 Aug 12;40(34):5079-5087
pubmed: 35871868