Promotion of a neurosurgical academic journal on social media: a 1-year experience.
Altmetrics
Bibliometrics
Neurosurgery
Social media
Twitter
Journal
Acta neurochirurgica
ISSN: 0942-0940
Titre abrégé: Acta Neurochir (Wien)
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 0151000
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Oct 2023
16 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
30
04
2023
accepted:
03
10
2023
medline:
16
10
2023
pubmed:
16
10
2023
entrez:
16
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Social media (SoMe) use, in all of its forms, has seen massively increased throughout the past two decades, including academic publishing. Many journals have established a SoMe presence, yet the influence of promotion of scientific publications on their visibility and impact remains poorly studied. The European Journal of Neurosurgery «Acta Neurochirurgica» has established its SoMe presence in form of a Twitter account that regularly promotes its publications. We aim to analyze the impact of this initial SoMe campaign on various alternative metrics (altmetrics). A retrospective analysis of all articles published in the journal Acta Neurochirurgica between May 1st, 2018, and April 30th, 2020, was performed. These articles were divided into a historical control group - containing the articles published between May 1st, 2018, and April 30th, 2019, when the SoMe campaign was not yet established - and into an intervention group. Several altmetrics were analyzed, along with website visits and PDF downloads per month. In total, 784 articles published during the study period, 128 (16.3%) were promoted via Twitter. During the promotion period, 29.7% of published articles were promoted. Overall, the published articles reached a mean of 31.3 ± 50.5 website visits and 17.5 ± 31.25 PDF downloads per month. Comparing the two study periods, no statistically significant differences in website visits (26.91 ± 32.87 vs. 34.90 ± 61.08, p = 0.189) and PDF downloads (17.52 ± 31.25 vs. 15.33 ± 16.07, p = 0.276) were detected. However, overall compared to non-promoted articles, promoted articles were visited (48.9 ± 95.0 vs. 29.0 ± 37.0, p = 0.005) and downloaded significantly more (25.7 ± 66.7 vs. 16.6 ± 18.0, p = 0.045) when compared to those who were not promoted during the promotion period. We report a 1-year initial experience with promotion of a general neurosurgical journal on Twitter. Our data suggest a clear benefit of promotion on article site visits and article downloads, although no single responsible element could be determined in terms of altmetrics. The impact of SoMe promotion on other metrics, including traditional bibliometrics such as citations and journal impact factor, remains to be determined.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Social media (SoMe) use, in all of its forms, has seen massively increased throughout the past two decades, including academic publishing. Many journals have established a SoMe presence, yet the influence of promotion of scientific publications on their visibility and impact remains poorly studied. The European Journal of Neurosurgery «Acta Neurochirurgica» has established its SoMe presence in form of a Twitter account that regularly promotes its publications. We aim to analyze the impact of this initial SoMe campaign on various alternative metrics (altmetrics).
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of all articles published in the journal Acta Neurochirurgica between May 1st, 2018, and April 30th, 2020, was performed. These articles were divided into a historical control group - containing the articles published between May 1st, 2018, and April 30th, 2019, when the SoMe campaign was not yet established - and into an intervention group. Several altmetrics were analyzed, along with website visits and PDF downloads per month.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 784 articles published during the study period, 128 (16.3%) were promoted via Twitter. During the promotion period, 29.7% of published articles were promoted. Overall, the published articles reached a mean of 31.3 ± 50.5 website visits and 17.5 ± 31.25 PDF downloads per month. Comparing the two study periods, no statistically significant differences in website visits (26.91 ± 32.87 vs. 34.90 ± 61.08, p = 0.189) and PDF downloads (17.52 ± 31.25 vs. 15.33 ± 16.07, p = 0.276) were detected. However, overall compared to non-promoted articles, promoted articles were visited (48.9 ± 95.0 vs. 29.0 ± 37.0, p = 0.005) and downloaded significantly more (25.7 ± 66.7 vs. 16.6 ± 18.0, p = 0.045) when compared to those who were not promoted during the promotion period.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We report a 1-year initial experience with promotion of a general neurosurgical journal on Twitter. Our data suggest a clear benefit of promotion on article site visits and article downloads, although no single responsible element could be determined in terms of altmetrics. The impact of SoMe promotion on other metrics, including traditional bibliometrics such as citations and journal impact factor, remains to be determined.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37843607
doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05829-7
pii: 10.1007/s00701-023-05829-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Alotaibi NM, Guha D, Fallah A, Aldakkan A, Nassiri F, Badhiwala JH, Ibrahim GM, Shamji MF, Macdonald RL, Lozano AM (2016) Social media metrics and bibliometric profiles of neurosurgical departments and journals: is there a relationship? World Neurosurg 90:574–579.e7
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.087
pubmed: 26855310
Bardus M, El Rassi R, Chahrour M, Akl EW, Raslan AS, Meho LI, Akl EA (2020) The use of social media to increase the impact of health research: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 22(7):e15607
doi: 10.2196/15607
pubmed: 32628113
pmcid: 7380994
Crotty D (2017) Altmetrics. European Heart Journal 38(35):2647–2648
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx447
pubmed: 28934843
Fox CS, Bonaca MA, Ryan JJ, Massaro JM, Barry K, Loscalzo J (2015) A randomized trial of social media from circulation. Circulation 131(1):28–33
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013509
pubmed: 25406308
Fox CS, Gurary EB, Ryan J, Bonaca M, Barry K, Loscalzo J, Massaro J (2016) Randomized controlled trial of social media: effect of increased intensity of the intervention. J Am Heart Assoc 5(5):e003088. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.003088
Fuller D, Potvin L (2020) Social media and the Canadian Journal of Public Health. Can J Public Health 111(2):149–150
doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00301-w
pubmed: 32112309
pmcid: 7109217
Gates A, Featherstone R, Shave K, Scott SD, Hartling L (2018) Dissemination of evidence in paediatric emergency medicine: a quantitative descriptive evaluation of a 16-week social media promotion. BMJ Open 8(6):e022298
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022298
pubmed: 29880576
pmcid: 6009559
Haldule S, Davalbhakta S, Agarwal V et al (2020) Post-publication promotion in rheumatology: a survey focusing on social media. Rheumatol Int 40:1865–1872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04700-7
Hennessy CM, Smith CF, Greener S, Ferns G (2019) Social media guidelines: a review for health professionals and faculty members. Clin Teacher 16(5):442–447
doi: 10.1111/tct.13033
Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG (2003) Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences, 5th, illustrated edn, vol 663. Houghton Mifflin. Original from the University of Michigan, p 756
(2023) Home / Twitter. In: Twitter. https://twitter.com/home . Accessed 29 Apr 2023
James A, Raux M (2020) Altmetrics scores: what are they? Anaesthesia Cr Care Pain Med 39(3):443–445
doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.03.015
Jandoc R, Burden AM, Mamdani M, Lévesque LE, Cadarette SM (2015) Interrupted time series analysis in drug utilization research is increasing: systematic review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 68(8):950–956
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.018
pubmed: 25890805
Jankovic SM (2021) Low sensitivity and specificity of existing bibliometric indices gives unrealistic picture of an author’s contribution to science. Acta Inform Med 29(1):69–70
doi: 10.5455/aim.2021.29.69-70
pubmed: 34012217
pmcid: 8116069
Jeong JW, Kim MJ, Oh H-K, Jeong S, Kim MH, Cho JR, Kim D-W, Kang S-B (2019) The impact of social media on citation rates in coloproctology. Colorectal Dis 21(10):1175–1182
doi: 10.1111/codi.14719
pubmed: 31124259
Kumar M (2010) The import of the impact factor: fallacies of citation-dependent scientometry. Bulletin 92(1):26–30
doi: 10.1308/147363510X481647
Luc JGY, Archer MA, Arora RC et al (2020) Social media improves cardiothoracic surgery literature dissemination: results of a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 109(2):589–595
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.062
pubmed: 31404547
Luc JGY, Archer MA, Arora RC et al (2021) Does tweeting improve citations? One-year results from the TSSMN prospective randomized trial. Annals Thoracic Surg 111(1):296–300
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065
Maggio LA, Leroux TC, Artino AR (2019) To tweet or not to tweet, that is the question: a randomized trial of Twitter effects on article engagement in medical education. https://doi.org/10.1101/642769
Nouri A, Haemmerli J, Lavé A et al (2021) Current state of social media utilization in neurosurgery amongst European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) member countries. Acta Neurochir. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04939-4
Panda S (2018) Medical journalism and social media: a boon and a bane? Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 84(6):647
doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_787_18
pubmed: 30323115
Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, Neylon C (2010) Altmetrics: a manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
Publications Output: U.S.2023 trends and international comparisons | NSF - National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20206/publication-output-by-region-country-or-economy . Accessed 29 Apr 2023
R Core Team (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Sathianathen NJ, Iii RL, Murphy DG, Loeb S, Bakker C, Lamb AD, Weight CJ (2020) Social media coverage of scientific articles immediately after publication predicts subsequent citations - #SoME_Impact score: observational analysis. J Med Internet Res 22(4):e12288
doi: 10.2196/12288
pubmed: 32301733
pmcid: 7195668
Sengor AMC (2014) How scientometry is killing science. GSA Today 24:44–45
doi: 10.1130/GSATG226GW.1
Streitberg B, Röhmel J (1986) Exact distributions for permutation and rank tests: an introduction to some recently published algorithms. Stat Software Newsletter 12(1):10–17
Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR (2013) Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One 8(5):e64841
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
pubmed: 23724101
pmcid: 3665624
Warren HR, Raison N, Dasgupta P (2017) The rise of altmetrics. JAMA 317(2):131–132
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.18346
pubmed: 28097363
Widmer RJ, Mandrekar J, Ward A, Aase LA, Lanier WL, Timimi FK, Gerber TC (2019) Effect of promotion via social media on access of articles in an academic medical journal: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med : J Assoc Am Med Colleges. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002811
Zhang D, Earp BE (2020) Correlation between social media posts and academic citations of orthopaedic research. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 4(9):e20.00151
pubmed: 32890011
pmcid: 7470009