SurgT challenge: Benchmark of soft-tissue trackers for robotic surgery.

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery Soft-tissue tracking Unsupervised learning

Journal

Medical image analysis
ISSN: 1361-8423
Titre abrégé: Med Image Anal
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9713490

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 28 02 2023
revised: 30 08 2023
accepted: 28 09 2023
pubmed: 17 10 2023
medline: 17 10 2023
entrez: 16 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This paper introduces the "SurgT: Surgical Tracking" challenge which was organized in conjunction with the 25th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2022). There were two purposes for the creation of this challenge: (1) the establishment of the first standardized benchmark for the research community to assess soft-tissue trackers; and (2) to encourage the development of unsupervised deep learning methods, given the lack of annotated data in surgery. A dataset of 157 stereo endoscopic videos from 20 clinical cases, along with stereo camera calibration parameters, have been provided. Participants were assigned the task of developing algorithms to track the movement of soft tissues, represented by bounding boxes, in stereo endoscopic videos. At the end of the challenge, the developed methods were assessed on a previously hidden test subset. This assessment uses benchmarking metrics that were purposely developed for this challenge, to verify the efficacy of unsupervised deep learning algorithms in tracking soft-tissue. The metric used for ranking the methods was the Expected Average Overlap (EAO) score, which measures the average overlap between a tracker's and the ground truth bounding boxes. Coming first in the challenge was the deep learning submission by ICVS-2Ai with a superior EAO score of 0.617. This method employs ARFlow to estimate unsupervised dense optical flow from cropped images, using photometric and regularization losses. Second, Jmees with an EAO of 0.583, uses deep learning for surgical tool segmentation on top of a non-deep learning baseline method: CSRT. CSRT by itself scores a similar EAO of 0.563. The results from this challenge show that currently, non-deep learning methods are still competitive. The dataset and benchmarking tool created for this challenge have been made publicly available at https://surgt.grand-challenge.org/. This challenge is expected to contribute to the development of autonomous robotic surgery and other digital surgical technologies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37844472
pii: S1361-8415(23)00245-1
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102985
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102985

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

João Cartucho (J)

The Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jmc19@ic.ac.uk.

Alistair Weld (A)

The Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.

Samyakh Tukra (S)

The Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.

Haozheng Xu (H)

The Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.

Taiyo Ishikawa (T)

Jmees, Japan.

Minjun Kwon (M)

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Daejeon, South Korea.

Yong Eun Jang (YE)

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Daejeon, South Korea.

Kwang-Ju Kim (KJ)

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Daejeon, South Korea.

Gwang Lee (G)

Ajou University, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.

Bizhe Bai (B)

Medical Computer Vision and Robotics Lab, University of Toronto, Canada.

Lueder A Kahrs (LA)

Medical Computer Vision and Robotics Lab, University of Toronto, Canada.

Lars Boecking (L)

Karlsruher Institut für Technologie: (KIT), Germany.

Simeon Allmendinger (S)

Karlsruher Institut für Technologie: (KIT), Germany.

Leopold Müller (L)

Karlsruher Institut für Technologie: (KIT), Germany.

Yitong Zhang (Y)

Surgical Robot Vision, University College London, United Kingdom.

Yueming Jin (Y)

Surgical Robot Vision, University College London, United Kingdom.

Sophia Bano (S)

Surgical Robot Vision, University College London, United Kingdom.

Francisco Vasconcelos (F)

Surgical Robot Vision, University College London, United Kingdom.

Wolfgang Reiter (W)

RIWOlink GmbH, Munich, Germany.

Jonas Hajek (J)

RIWOlink GmbH, Munich, Germany.

Bruno Silva (B)

Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal; ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal; 2Ai - School of Technology, IPCA, Barcelos, Portugal.

Estevão Lima (E)

Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal; ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.

João L Vilaça (JL)

2Ai - School of Technology, IPCA, Barcelos, Portugal.

Sandro Queirós (S)

Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal; ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.

Stamatia Giannarou (S)

The Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH