Advanced midwifery practice: A scoping review.

Advanced midwifery practice Midwifery Scope of practice Scoping review

Journal

Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives
ISSN: 1878-1799
Titre abrégé: Women Birth
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101266131

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 26 07 2023
revised: 04 10 2023
accepted: 05 10 2023
medline: 17 10 2023
pubmed: 17 10 2023
entrez: 16 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There is no international standard for advanced midwifery scope of practice. Globally, there is variance in how scope of midwifery practice is determined and regulated, with no consensus on extended or advanced scope. This can lead to under-utilised staff potential, un-met consumer need, and loss of professional skill. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesise and map what is reported in the international literature on the advanced scope of midwifery practice. A systematic scoping review methodology was adopted utilising Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A full search was conducted of databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Google. Publications from 2019 to August 2022 that met criteria were included. Reported skills were mapped to the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) competencies of pre-conception, antenatal, labour and birth, postnatal plus globally identified areas for midwifery investment. 28 articles met inclusion criteria. Reported skills included abortion care (n = 6), prescribing (n = 7), ultrasound (n = 2), advanced practice skills (n = 7), midwifery-led skills, primary health, post-graduate education, HIV/AIDS testing, advocacy, and acupressure (all n = 1). This review presents a synopsis of publications describing what has been defined as advanced midwifery scope of practice in international contexts. Establishing evidence of midwives working to the peak of professional scope is important to continue to develop professional capacity and support contemporary practice, regulation, governance, and policy while improving consumer access to equitable care. Findings aid service development, provision, and professional planning.

Sections du résumé

PROBLEM OBJECTIVE
There is no international standard for advanced midwifery scope of practice.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Globally, there is variance in how scope of midwifery practice is determined and regulated, with no consensus on extended or advanced scope. This can lead to under-utilised staff potential, un-met consumer need, and loss of professional skill.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
The aim of this scoping review was to synthesise and map what is reported in the international literature on the advanced scope of midwifery practice.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic scoping review methodology was adopted utilising Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A full search was conducted of databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Google. Publications from 2019 to August 2022 that met criteria were included. Reported skills were mapped to the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) competencies of pre-conception, antenatal, labour and birth, postnatal plus globally identified areas for midwifery investment.
FINDINGS RESULTS
28 articles met inclusion criteria. Reported skills included abortion care (n = 6), prescribing (n = 7), ultrasound (n = 2), advanced practice skills (n = 7), midwifery-led skills, primary health, post-graduate education, HIV/AIDS testing, advocacy, and acupressure (all n = 1).
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
This review presents a synopsis of publications describing what has been defined as advanced midwifery scope of practice in international contexts.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Establishing evidence of midwives working to the peak of professional scope is important to continue to develop professional capacity and support contemporary practice, regulation, governance, and policy while improving consumer access to equitable care. Findings aid service development, provision, and professional planning.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37845089
pii: S1871-5192(23)00294-9
doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.10.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Kaylie Toll (K)

School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. Electronic address: kaylie.toll@curtin.edu.au.

Tarryn Sharp (T)

WA Country Health Service, Western Australia, Australia.

Kate Reynolds (K)

WA Country Health Service, Western Australia, Australia.

Zoe Bradfield (Z)

School of Nursing, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; King Edward Memorial Hospital, Bagot Rd, Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Classifications MeSH