Mechanical behaviors of titanium, nickel-titanium, and stainless elastic intramedullary nail in fixation of tibial diaphyseal fractures.
Contact force
Elastic intramedullary nail
Finite element modeling
Tibial diaphyseal fracture
Journal
Injury
ISSN: 1879-0267
Titre abrégé: Injury
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0226040
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
14
08
2023
revised:
20
09
2023
accepted:
02
10
2023
medline:
5
12
2023
pubmed:
17
10
2023
entrez:
16
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Elastic nails have been widely used in the diaphyseal fracture fixation of long bones in adolescents. However, high complication rates have been reported in cases involving weights exceeding 55 kg. The existing nails are fabricated with different metals in clinical settings; however, the effect of the materials on the mechanical responses of the fractured bone remains unclear. Hence, the present study is conducted to compare the mechanical responses of typically used metals, namely titanium, stainless, and nickel-titanium, for elastic nails in the fixation of tibial diaphyseal fractures. A sawbone tube is used to determine the contact force, which is developed after constraining the nail inside the narrow canal using different nail materials. Furthermore, a finite element (FE) model of the tibial diaphyseal fracture is developed to predict the fracture gap deformation based on different nail materials under axial compression and bending loads. The push-out force in the FE simulation is compared with that of a case without an end cap. In the sawbone tube, the results indicate that the contact force developed by the titanium nail is significantly higher than those developed by stainless and nickel-titanium nails. The contact forces developed by the titanium, stainless steel, and nickel- titanium nails are 385 (SD 34), 358 (SD 49), and 258 (SD 42) N, respectively. In the FE simulation, the titanium nail yields the highest push-out force when an end cap is not used, and the push-out forces in axial compression are 201, 183, and 87 N in the titanium, stainless, and nickel-titanium nails under axial compression, respectively. By contrast, the stainless nail yields the smallest gap deformation when an end cap is used. Results of the present study show that the end cap is an important factor affecting the mechanical responses of nails fabricated using different materials. Titanium nails are preferred when an end cap is not used, whereas stainless nails are preferred when an end cap is used.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37845172
pii: S0020-1383(23)00801-X
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111097
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
titanium nickelide
12035-60-8
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Nickel
7OV03QG267
nitinol
2EWL73IJ7F
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
111097Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors of this study have no financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence the results of the study.