A scoping review of equity-focused implementation theories, models and frameworks in healthcare and their application in addressing ethnicity-related health inequities.
Ethnic inequities
Frameworks
Health inequity
Implementation
Models
Scoping review
Theories
Journal
Implementation science : IS
ISSN: 1748-5908
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101258411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 10 2023
16 10 2023
Historique:
received:
06
03
2023
accepted:
14
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
17
10
2023
entrez:
16
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Inequities in implementation contribute to the unequal benefit of health interventions between groups of people with differing levels of advantage in society. Implementation science theories, models and frameworks (TMFs) provide a theoretical basis for understanding the multi-level factors that influence implementation outcomes and are used to guide implementation processes. This study aimed to identify and analyse TMFs that have an equity focus or have been used to implement interventions in populations who experience ethnicity or 'race'-related health inequities. A scoping review was conducted to identify the relevant literature published from January 2011 to April 2022 by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE and CINAHL), the Dissemination and Implementation model database, hand-searching key journals and searching the reference lists and citations of studies that met the inclusion criteria. Titles, abstracts and full-text articles were screened independently by at least two researchers. Data were extracted from studies meeting the inclusion criteria, including the study characteristics, TMF description and operationalisation. TMFs were categorised as determinant frameworks, classic theories, implementation theories, process models and evaluation frameworks according to their overarching aim and described with respect to how equity and system-level factors influencing implementation were incorporated. Database searches yielded 610 results, 70 of which were eligible for full-text review, and 18 met the inclusion criteria. A further eight publications were identified from additional sources. In total, 26 papers describing 15 TMFs and their operationalisation were included. Categorisation resulted in four determinant frameworks, one implementation theory, six process models and three evaluation frameworks. One framework included elements of determinant, process and evaluation TMFs and was therefore classified as a 'hybrid' framework. TMFs varied in their equity and systems focus. Twelve TMFs had an equity focus and three were established TMFs applied in an equity context. All TMFs at least partially considered systems-level factors, with five fully considering macro-, meso- and micro-level influences on equity and implementation. This scoping review identifies and summarises the implementation science TMFs available to support equity-focused implementation. This review may be used as a resource to guide TMF selection and illustrate how TMFs have been utilised in equity-focused implementation activities.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Inequities in implementation contribute to the unequal benefit of health interventions between groups of people with differing levels of advantage in society. Implementation science theories, models and frameworks (TMFs) provide a theoretical basis for understanding the multi-level factors that influence implementation outcomes and are used to guide implementation processes. This study aimed to identify and analyse TMFs that have an equity focus or have been used to implement interventions in populations who experience ethnicity or 'race'-related health inequities.
METHODS
A scoping review was conducted to identify the relevant literature published from January 2011 to April 2022 by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE and CINAHL), the Dissemination and Implementation model database, hand-searching key journals and searching the reference lists and citations of studies that met the inclusion criteria. Titles, abstracts and full-text articles were screened independently by at least two researchers. Data were extracted from studies meeting the inclusion criteria, including the study characteristics, TMF description and operationalisation. TMFs were categorised as determinant frameworks, classic theories, implementation theories, process models and evaluation frameworks according to their overarching aim and described with respect to how equity and system-level factors influencing implementation were incorporated.
RESULTS
Database searches yielded 610 results, 70 of which were eligible for full-text review, and 18 met the inclusion criteria. A further eight publications were identified from additional sources. In total, 26 papers describing 15 TMFs and their operationalisation were included. Categorisation resulted in four determinant frameworks, one implementation theory, six process models and three evaluation frameworks. One framework included elements of determinant, process and evaluation TMFs and was therefore classified as a 'hybrid' framework. TMFs varied in their equity and systems focus. Twelve TMFs had an equity focus and three were established TMFs applied in an equity context. All TMFs at least partially considered systems-level factors, with five fully considering macro-, meso- and micro-level influences on equity and implementation.
CONCLUSIONS
This scoping review identifies and summarises the implementation science TMFs available to support equity-focused implementation. This review may be used as a resource to guide TMF selection and illustrate how TMFs have been utilised in equity-focused implementation activities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37845686
doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01304-0
pii: 10.1186/s13012-023-01304-0
pmc: PMC10578009
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
51Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429–45.
pubmed: 1644507
Shadmi E, Chen Y, Dourado I, Faran-Perach I, Furler J, Hangoma P, et al. Health equity and COVID-19: global perspectives. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1):104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01218-z .
Anderson I, Robson B, Connolly M, Al-Yaman F, Bjertness E, King A, et al. Indigenous and tribal peoples′ health (The Lancet-Lowitja Institute Global Collaboration): a population study. Lancet. 2016;388(10040):131–57.
pubmed: 27108232
Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Schlotheuber A, Gacic-Dobo M, Hansen PM, Senouci K, et al. State of inequality in diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis immunisation coverage in low-income and middle-income countries: a multicountry study of household health surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(9):e617–26.
pubmed: 27497954
pmcid: 4985563
Plummer M, de Martel C, Vignat J, Ferlay J, Bray F, Franceschi S. Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2012: a synthetic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(9):e609–16.
pubmed: 27470177
World Health Organization. State of inequality: reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. 2015. [Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/gho-documents/health-equity/state-of-inequality/state-of-inequality-reproductive-maternal-new-born-and-child-health.pdf ] Accessed 13 Feb 2023.
Ministry of Health. Achieving equity in health outcomes: summary of a discovery process. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Health; 2019. [Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/achieving-equity-in-health-outcomes-summary-of-a-discovery-process-30jul2019.pdf ] Accessed 10 Feb 2023.
World Health Organization. Health equity. 2022. [Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-equity#tab=tab_1 ] Accessed 3 Feb 2023.
Yao Q, Li X, Luo F, Yang L, Liu C, Sun J. The historical roots and seminal research on health equity: a referenced publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1058-3 .
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Smedley BD, Stith AY, editors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
Baumann AA, Cabassa LJ. Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4975-3 .
Hall M, Graffunder C, Metzler M. Policy approaches to advancing health equity. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016;22(Supplement 1):S50–9.
pubmed: 26599030
Toleikyte L, UCL Institute of Health Equity, Salway S. Local action on health inequalities Understanding and reducing ethnic inequalities in health London, England. 2018.
Government of Canada. Indigenous health care in Canada. 2023. [Available from: https://www.sac-isc.gc.ca/eng/1626810177053/1626810219482 ] Accessed 23 June 2023.
Fisher M, Harris P, Freeman T, Mackean T, George E, Friel S, et al. Implementing universal and targeted policies for health equity: lessons from Australia. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(10):2308–18.
pubmed: 34821141
Ministry of Health. Achieving equity in health outcomes: summary of a discovery process. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Health; 2019.
Braveman P, Parker Dominguez T. Abandon “Race.” Focus on Racism. Front Public Health. 2021;9:689462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.689462 .
Kapadia D, Zhang J, Salway S, Nazroo J, Booth A, Villarroel-Williams N, et al. Ethnic inequalities in healthcare: a rapid evidence review. London, UK: NHS Race and Health Observatory; 2022. [Available from: http://www.nhsrho.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/RHO-Rapid-Review-Final-Report_v.7.pdf ] Accessed 10 Feb 2023.
Ryan D, Grey C, Mischewski B. Tofa Saili: A review of evidence about health equity for Pacific Peoples in New Zealand. Wellington, NZ: Pacific Perspectives; 2019. [Available from: https://www.pacificperspectives.co.nz/publications ] Accessed 13 Feb 2023.
Reid P, Robson B. Understanding health inequities. In: Robson B, Harris R, editors. Hauora: Māori Standards of Health IV: a study of the years 2000–2005. IV. Wellington, NZ: Te Rōpū Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pōmare; 2007. p. 3–10.
Waitangi Tribunal. Hauora: Report on stage one of the health services and outcomes Kaupapa inquiry. Wellington, NZ: Waitangi Tribunal; 2019. [Available from: https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_152801817/Hauora%20W.pdf ] Accessed 11 Feb 2023.
Baumgartner JC, Aboulafia GN, Getachew Y, Radley DC, Collins SR, Zephyrin L. Inequities in health and health care in Black and Latinx/Hispanic communities: 23 charts. The Commonwealth Fund; 2021. [Available from: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/2021/jun/inequities-health-care-black-latinx-hispanic-communities-23-charts ] Accessed 13 Feb 2023.
Teng AM, Atkinson J, Disney G, Wilson N, Sarfati D, McLeod M, et al. Ethnic inequalities in cancer incidence and mortality: census-linked cohort studies with 87 million years of person-time follow-up. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):755. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2781-4 .
Zavala VA, Bracci PM, Carethers JM, Carvajal-Carmona L, Coggins NB, Cruz-Correa MR, et al. Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States. Br J Cancer. 2020;124(2):315–32.
pubmed: 32901135
pmcid: 7852513
Berchet C, Bijlholt J, Ando M. Socio-economic and ethnic health inequalities in COVID-19 outcomes across OECD countries. 2023.
Kirmayer LJ, Brass G. Addressing global health disparities among Indigenous peoples. The Lancet. 2016;388(10040):105–6.
Loper A, Woo B, Metz A. Equity Is fundamental to implementation science. Stanf Soc Innov Rev. 2021;19(3):A3-5.
Alvidrez J, Nápoles AM, Bernal G, Lloyd J, Cargill V, Godette D, et al. Building the evidence base to inform planned intervention adaptations by practitioners serving health disparity populations. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(S1):S94–101.
pubmed: 30699023
pmcid: 6356120
Lorenc T, Oliver K. Adverse effects of public health interventions: a conceptual framework. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(3):288–90.
pubmed: 24336237
Yancey AT, Glenn BA, Ford CL, Bell-Lewis L. Dissemination and implementation research among racial/ethnic minority and other vulnerable populations. 2017. p. 449–70.
Erves JC, Mayo-Gamble TL, Malin-Fair A, Boyer A, Joosten Y, Vaughn YC, et al. Needs, priorities, and recommendations for engaging underrepresented populations in clinical research: a community perspective. J Community Health. 2016;42(3):472–80.
pmcid: 5408035
Paradies Y, Ben J, Denson N, Elias A, Priest N, Pieterse A, et al. Racism as a determinant of health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One. 2015;10(9):e0138511.
pubmed: 26398658
pmcid: 4580597
Talamaivao N, Harris R, Cormack D, Paine SJ, King P. Racism and health in Aotearoa New Zealand: a systematic review of quantitative studies. N Z Med J. 2020;133(1521):55–68.
pubmed: 32994637
Shelton RC, Adsul P, Oh A. Recommendations for addressing structural racism in implementation science: a call to the field. Ethn Dis. 2021;31(Suppl 1):357–64.
pubmed: 34045837
pmcid: 8143847
Shelton RC, Adsul P, Oh A, Moise N, Griffith DM. Application of an antiracism lens in the field of implementation science (IS): recommendations for reframing implementation research with a focus on justice and racial equity. Implement Res Pract. 2021;2:26334895211049480.
pubmed: 37089985
pmcid: 9978668
Brownson RC, Kumanyika SK, Kreuter MW, Haire-Joshu D. Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1):28.
pubmed: 33740999
pmcid: 7977499
DuMont K, Metz A, Woo B. Five recommendations for how implementation science can better advance equity. Washington, DC: Academy Health; 2019. [Available from: https://academyhealth.org/blog/2019-04/five-recommendations-how-implementation-science-can-better-advance-equity ] Accessed 13 Feb 2023.
Kerkhoff AD, Farrand E, Marquez C, Cattamanchi A, Handley MA. Addressing health disparities through implementation science—a need to integrate an equity lens from the outset. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):13.
pubmed: 35101088
pmcid: 8802460
Chinman M, Woodward EN, Curran GM, Hausmann LRM. Harnessing implementation science to increase the impact of health equity research. Med Care. 2017;55(Suppl 2):S16–23.
pubmed: 28806362
pmcid: 5639697
McNulty M, Smith JD, Villamar J, Burnett-Zeigler I, Vermeer W, Benbow N, et al. Implementation research methodologies for achieving scientific equity and health equity. Ethn Dis. 2019;29(Suppl 1):83–92.
pubmed: 30906154
pmcid: 6428169
Watkins C, Hornack R. A review of implementation science theories, models and frameworks through an equity lens. Chapel Hill, NC: National Implementation Research Network, University of North Carolina; 2022. [Available from: https://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/practicing-implementation/review-implementation-science-theories-models-and-frameworks-through ] Accessed 13 Feb 2023.
Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.
pubmed: 25895742
pmcid: 4406164
Odeny B. Closing the health equity gap: a role for implementation science? PLoS Med. 2021;18(9):e1003762.
pubmed: 34520477
pmcid: 8439460
Clarke AR, Goddu AP, Nocon RS, Stock NW, Chyr LC, Akuoko JA, et al. Thirty years of disparities intervention research: what are we doing to close racial and ethnic gaps in health care? Med Care. 2013;51(11):1020–6.
pubmed: 24128746
World Health Organization. Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. Albany, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.
Riley BL, Willis CD, Holmes B, Finegood DT, Best A, McIsaac JLD. Systems thinking and dissemination and implementation research. 2017. p. 143–56.
Hernandez A, Ruano AL, Marchal B, San Sebastian M, Flores W. Engaging with complexity to improve the health of indigenous people: a call for the use of systems thinking to tackle health inequity. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):26.
pubmed: 28219429
pmcid: 5319053
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–4.
pubmed: 25034198
Rankin NM, McGregor D, Stone E, Butow PN, Young JM, White K, et al. Evidence-practice gaps in lung cancer: a scoping review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018;27(2):e12588. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12588 .
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.
pubmed: 30178033
Gustafson P, Abdul Aziz Y, Lambert M, Bartholomew K, Brown R, Carswell P, et al. Supporting implementation of interventions to address ethnicity-related health inequities: frameworks, facilitators and barriers – a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2023;13(2):e065721. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065721 .
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O′Brien K. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 .
Brown CH, Curran G, Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Wells KB, Jones L, et al. An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:1–22.
pubmed: 28384085
pmcid: 5384265
Glasgow RE, Estabrooks PA, Ory MG. Characterizing evolving frameworks: issues from Esmail et al. (2020) review. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01009-8 .
Kilbourne AM, Switzer G, Hyman K, Crowley-Matoka M, Fine MJ. Advancing health disparities research within the health care system: a conceptual framework. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(12):2113–21.
pubmed: 17077411
pmcid: 1698151
Alcaraz KI, Sly J, Ashing K, Fleisher L, Gil-Rivas V, Ford S, et al. The ConNECT Framework: a model for advancing behavioral medicine science and practice to foster health equity. J Behav Med. 2017;40(1):23–38.
pubmed: 27509892
Eslava-Schmalbach J, Garzón-Orjuela N, Elias V, Reveiz L, Tran N, Langlois EV. Conceptual framework of equity-focused implementation research for health programs (EquIR). Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0984-4 .
Maar M, Yeates K, Barron M, Hua D, Liu P, Lum-Kwong MM, et al. I-RREACH: an engagement and assessment tool for improving implementation readiness of researchers, organizations and communities in complex interventions. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0257-6 .
Nápoles AM, Stewart AL. Transcreation: an implementation science framework for community-engaged behavioral interventions to reduce health disparities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):710. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3521-z .
Oetzel J, Scott N, Hudson M, Masters-Awatere B, Rarere M, Foote J, et al. Implementation framework for chronic disease intervention effectiveness in Māori and other indigenous communities. Glob Health. 2017;13(1):69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0295-8 .
Percival NA, McCalman J, Armit C, O’Donoghue L, Bainbridge R, Rowley K, et al. Implementing health promotion tools in Australian Indigenous primary health care. Health Promot Int. 2018;33(1):92–106.
Yousefi Nooraie R, Kwan BM, Cohn E, AuYoung M, Clarke Roberts M, Adsul P, et al. Advancing health equity through CTSA programs: opportunities for interaction between health equity, dissemination and implementation, and translational science. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;4(3):168–75.
Cabassa LJ, Druss B, Wang Y, Lewis-Fernández R. Collaborative planning approach to inform the implementation of a healthcare manager intervention for hispanics with serious mental illness: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-80 .
Henderson V, Tossas-Milligan K, Martinez E, Williams B, Torres P, Mannan N, et al. Implementation of an integrated framework for a breast cancer screening and navigation program for women from underresourced communities. Cancer. 2020;126(S10):2481–93.
pubmed: 32348565
Woodward EN, Matthieu MM, Uchendu US, Rogal S, Kirchner JE. The health equity implementation framework: proposal and preliminary study of hepatitis C virus treatment. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0861-y .
Shelton RC, Chambers DA, Glasgow RE. An extension of RE-AIM to enhance sustainability: addressing dynamic context and promoting health equity over time. Public Health Front. 2020;8:134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00134 .
Gordon EJ, Lee J, Kang RH, Caicedo JC, Holl JL, Ladner DP, et al. A complex culturally targeted intervention to reduce Hispanic disparities in living kidney donor transplantation: an effectiveness-implementation hybrid study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):368. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3151-5 .
Gordon EJ, Romo E, Amórtegui D, Rodas A, Anderson N, Uriarte J, et al. Implementing culturally competent transplant care and implications for reducing health disparities: a prospective qualitative study. Health Expect. 2020;23(6):1450–65.
pubmed: 33037746
pmcid: 7752187
Goff SL, Moran MJ, Szegda K, Fioroni T, DeBanate MA, Byatt N. Development and pilot testing of an adaptable protocol to address postpartum depression in pediatric practices serving lower-income and racial/ethnic minority families: contextual considerations. Imp Sci Comms. 2020;1(1):66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00049-x .
Lam H, Quinn M, Cipriano-Steffens T, Jayaprakash M, Koebnick E, Randal F, et al. Identifying actionable strategies: using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-informed interviews to evaluate the implementation of a multilevel intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening. Imp Sci Comms. 2021;2(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00150-9 .
Handley MA, Harleman E, Gonzalez-Mendez E, Stotland NE, Althavale P, Fisher L, et al. Applying the COM-B model to creation of an IT-enabled health coaching and resource linkage program for low-income Latina moms with recent gestational diabetes: the STAR MAMA program. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0426-2 .
Gould GS, Bar-Zeev Y, Bovill M, Atkins L, Gruppetta M, Clarke MJ, et al. Designing an implementation intervention with the Behaviour Change Wheel for health provider smoking cessation care for Australian Indigenous pregnant women. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0645-1 .
Glasgow RE, Askew S, Purcell P, Levine E, Warner ET, Stange KC, et al. Use of RE-AIM to address health inequities: application in a low-income community health center based weight loss and hypertension self-management program. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(2):200–10.
pubmed: 23750180
pmcid: 3671594
Masters-Awatere B, Cassim S, Tamatea J, Scott N, Simpson C, Paekau C. He Pikinga Waiora Kimi Ora lifestyle programme: case study of a successful community-based Indigenous diabetes intervention. N Z Med J. 2021;134(1545):68–78.
pubmed: 34788273
Oetzel J, Rarere M, Wihapi R, Manuel C, Tapsell J. A case study of using the He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in Māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1):103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01222-3 .
Rarere M, Oetzel J, Masters-Awatere B, Scott N, Wihapi R, Manuel C, et al. Critical reflection for researcher–community partnership effectiveness: the He Pikinga Waiora process evaluation tool guiding the implementation of chronic condition interventions in Indigenous communities. Aust J Prim Health. 2019;25(5):478–85.
Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 .
Drake C, Batchelder H, Lian T, Cannady M, Weinberger M, Eisenson H, et al. Implementation of social needs screening in primary care: a qualitative study using the health equity implementation framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):975.
pubmed: 34530826
pmcid: 8445654
Smitherman EA, Goh I, Pooni R, Vora SS, Yildirim-Toruner C, von Scheven E. Implementation science in pediatric rheumatology: a path to health equity. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2022;48(1):331–42.
Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Samayoa C, Palomino H, Urias A, Gonzalez N, et al. Translating a stress management intervention for rural Latina breast cancer survivors: the Nuevo Amanecer-II. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10): e0224068.
pubmed: 31618266
pmcid: 6795501
Cabassa LJ, Gomes AP, Meyreles Q, Capitelli L, Younge R, Dragatsi D, et al. Using the collaborative intervention planning framework to adapt a health-care manager intervention to a new population and provider group to improve the health of people with serious mental illness. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0178-9 .
Holtrop JS, Estabrooks PA, Gaglio B, Harden SM, Kessler RS, King DK, et al. Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: clarifications and resources. J Clin Transl Sci. 2021;5(1): e126.
pubmed: 34367671
pmcid: 8327549
Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, Rabin B, Smith ML, Porter GC, et al. RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Front Public Health. 2019;7:64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064 .
Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008;36(1):24–34.
pubmed: 19104929
Woodward E, Adsul P, Shelton R, Cabassa LJ, Baumann A. Bringing a health equity lens to implementation science frameworks. St. Louis, MO: Institute for Public Health, Washington University; 2021. [Available from: https://publichealth.wustl.edu/bringing-a-health-equity-lens-to-implementation-science-frameworks/ ] Accessed 12 Feb 2023.
Adsul P, Chambers D, Brandt HM, Fernandez ME, Ramanadhan S, Torres E, et al. Grounding implementation science in health equity for cancer prevention and control. Imp Sci Comms 2022;3(1).
Srinivasan S, Williams SD. Transitioning from health disparities to a health equity research agenda: the time is now. Public Health Rep. 2014;129 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):71–6.
pubmed: 24385668
Fernandez ME, ten Hoor GA, van Lieshout S, Rodriguez SA, Beidas RS, Parcel G, et al. Implementation Mapping: using intervention mapping to develop implementation strategies. Frontiers in Public Health. 2019;7:158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00158 .
Dickson KS, Holt T, Arredondo E. Applying Implementation Mapping to expand a care coordination program at a Federally Qualified Health Center. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022;10.
Allen M, Wilhelm A, Ortega LE, Pergament S, Bates N, Cunningham B. Applying a race(ism)-conscious adaptation of the CFIR framework to understand implementation of a school-based equity-oriented intervention. Ethn Dis. 2021;31(Suppl):375–88.
pubmed: 34045839
pmcid: 8143857
Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation Science. 2022;17(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0 .
Ramanadhan S, Davis MM, Armstrong R, Baquero B, Ko LK, Leng JC, et al. Participatory implementation science to increase the impact of evidence-based cancer prevention and control. Cancer Causes Control. 2018;29(3):363–9.
pubmed: 29417296
pmcid: 5858707
Sánchez V, Sanchez-Youngman S, Dickson E, Burgess E, Haozous E, Trickett E, et al. CBPR implementation framework for community-academic partnerships. Am J Community Psychol. 2021;67(3–4):284–96.
pubmed: 33823072