A Single-Center Comparative Study: Outcome Analysis of Fixation Techniques for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis.
ankle joint arthrodesis
aofas hind foot score
plate and screws
retrograde intramedullary nail
sf-36
tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
accepted:
15
09
2023
medline:
17
10
2023
pubmed:
17
10
2023
entrez:
17
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is a well-known and accepted surgical technique for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative clinical and radiological comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) and plate/cannulated screw (P/cS) fixation methods in patients undergoing TTCA. Methods Patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis due to traumatic causes or rheumatic diseases between December 2012 and March 2019 were included in the retrospective study. Patients who underwent isolated tibiotalar or isolated subtalar arthrodesis were not included in the study. Functional scores of patients with bone fusion were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) quality of life score surveys, administered either in person or by phone. From the radiological point of view, it was evaluated whether the union was achieved with the two-view ankle radiograph. There were 48 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis in the clinical archive. A total of 31 patients were excluded from the study due to failure to attend follow-up, inability to be reached, or non-compliance with study criteria. The mean age of the patients participating in the study was 44.12 ± 12.95 years, the follow-up time was 40.06 ± 27.31 months, the union time was 5.19 ± 3.17 months, and the AOFAS score was 53.12 ± 13.87. SF-36 scores were evaluated among their own subunits. Results A total of 17 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 13 were male (76.47%) and 4 were female (23.53%). There was no significant effect of the fixation methods (RIMN or P/cS) selected for TTCA on union times (p>0.05). However, there were significant differences in some parameters of the SF-36 when compared by gender. According to this, the scores of men in physical function (PF), mental health (MH), and general health perception (GHP) were higher than those of women. When AOFAS and SF-36 scores were compared by fixation type, no statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05). Conclusion This study investigated the impact of the fixation method on clinical and radiological outcomes in TTCA. We found that both methods were clinically similar in terms of bone union time and surgical efficacy. However, men had better physical function, mental health, and general health perception after TTCA than women.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37846254
doi: 10.7759/cureus.45308
pmc: PMC10576983
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e45308Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Savaş et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Sep;29(9):936-41
pubmed: 18778675
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 May-Jun;54(3):399-405
pubmed: 25434867
Foot Ankle Clin. 2008 Sep;13(3):341-52, vii
pubmed: 18692003
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009 Dec;17(3):321-4
pubmed: 20065373
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Sep-Oct;51(5):693-5
pubmed: 22687529
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Jan;32(1):47-56
pubmed: 21288434
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Apr;28(4):431-4
pubmed: 17475136
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Apr;35(4):360-7
pubmed: 24505043
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2006 Winter;17(4):296-304
pubmed: 17183446
Foot (Edinb). 2012 Sep;22(3):163-6
pubmed: 22436838
Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jun;30(3):232-238
pubmed: 27594929
Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Apr;27(3):332-338
pubmed: 33358603
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Nov;92(11):1540-7
pubmed: 21037349
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004 Mar-Apr;43(2):82-6
pubmed: 15057853
Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;14(1):1-10
pubmed: 19083604
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jul;467(7):1800-6
pubmed: 18830791
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 May;94(5):704-8
pubmed: 22529095
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2010 May-Jun;12(3):245-9
pubmed: 20675866
Indian J Orthop. 2015 Mar-Apr;49(2):227-32
pubmed: 26015614
Iowa Orthop J. 2005;25:44-6
pubmed: 16089071
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2011 Mar;8(2):159-66
pubmed: 21381909
Clin Sports Med. 2005 Jan;24(1):1-12
pubmed: 15636773
Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Dec;15(12):669-73
pubmed: 7894640
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 May;34(5):657-65
pubmed: 23467838
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(4):631-644
pubmed: 36518930