Preferences for oral-fluid-based or blood-based HIV self-testing and provider-delivered testing: an observational study among different populations in Zimbabwe.
Female sex workers
HIV self-testing
Men
Observational study
Zimbabwe
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Oct 2023
17 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
22
03
2022
accepted:
18
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
18
10
2023
entrez:
17
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is limited data on client preferences for different HIV self-testing (HIVST) and provider-delivered testing options and associated factors. We explored client preferences for oral-fluid-based self-testing (OFBST), blood-based self-testing (BBST) and provider-delivered blood-based testing (PDBBT) among different populations. At clinics providing HIV testing services to general populations (1 urban, 1 rural clinic), men seeking voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC, 1 clinic), and female sex workers (FSW, 1 clinic), clients had the option to test using OFBST, BBST or PDBBT. A pre-test questionnaire collected information on demographics and testing history. Two weeks after collecting a self-test kit, participants responded to a questionnaire. We used logistic regression to determine predictors of choices. We also conducted 20 in-depth interviews to contextualise quantitative findings. May to June 2019, we recruited 1244 participants of whom 249 (20%), 251 (20%), 244 (20%) and 500 (40%) were attending urban general, rural, VMMC and FSW clinics, respectively. Half (n = 619, 50%) chose OFBST, 440 (35%) and 185 (15%) chose BBST and PDBBT, respectively. In multivariable analysis comparing those choosing HIVST (OFBST and BBST combined) versus not, those who had never married aOR 0.57 (95% CI 0.34-0.93) and those previously married aOR0.56 (0.34-0.93) were less likely versus married participants to choose HIVST. HIVST preference increased with education, aOR 2.00 (1.28-3.13), 2.55 (1.28-5.07), 2.76 (1.48-5.14) for ordinary, advanced and tertiary education, respectively versus none/primary education. HIVST preference decreased with age aOR 0.97 (0.96-0.99). Urban participants were more likely than rural ones to choose HIVST, aOR 9.77 (5.47-17.41), 3.38 (2.03-5.62) and 2.23 (1.38-3.61) for FSW, urban general and VMMC clients, respectively. Comparing those choosing OFBST with those choosing BBST, less literate participants were less likely to choose oral fluid tests, aOR 0.29 (0.09-0.92). Most testing clients opted for OFBST, followed by BBST and lastly, PDBBT. Those who self-assessed as less healthy were more likely to opt for PDBBT which likely facilitated linkage. Results show importance of continued provision of all strategies in order to meet needs of different populations, and may be useful to inform both HIVST kit stock projections and tailoring of HIVST programs to meet the needs of different populations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is limited data on client preferences for different HIV self-testing (HIVST) and provider-delivered testing options and associated factors. We explored client preferences for oral-fluid-based self-testing (OFBST), blood-based self-testing (BBST) and provider-delivered blood-based testing (PDBBT) among different populations.
METHODS
METHODS
At clinics providing HIV testing services to general populations (1 urban, 1 rural clinic), men seeking voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC, 1 clinic), and female sex workers (FSW, 1 clinic), clients had the option to test using OFBST, BBST or PDBBT. A pre-test questionnaire collected information on demographics and testing history. Two weeks after collecting a self-test kit, participants responded to a questionnaire. We used logistic regression to determine predictors of choices. We also conducted 20 in-depth interviews to contextualise quantitative findings.
RESULTS
RESULTS
May to June 2019, we recruited 1244 participants of whom 249 (20%), 251 (20%), 244 (20%) and 500 (40%) were attending urban general, rural, VMMC and FSW clinics, respectively. Half (n = 619, 50%) chose OFBST, 440 (35%) and 185 (15%) chose BBST and PDBBT, respectively. In multivariable analysis comparing those choosing HIVST (OFBST and BBST combined) versus not, those who had never married aOR 0.57 (95% CI 0.34-0.93) and those previously married aOR0.56 (0.34-0.93) were less likely versus married participants to choose HIVST. HIVST preference increased with education, aOR 2.00 (1.28-3.13), 2.55 (1.28-5.07), 2.76 (1.48-5.14) for ordinary, advanced and tertiary education, respectively versus none/primary education. HIVST preference decreased with age aOR 0.97 (0.96-0.99). Urban participants were more likely than rural ones to choose HIVST, aOR 9.77 (5.47-17.41), 3.38 (2.03-5.62) and 2.23 (1.38-3.61) for FSW, urban general and VMMC clients, respectively. Comparing those choosing OFBST with those choosing BBST, less literate participants were less likely to choose oral fluid tests, aOR 0.29 (0.09-0.92).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Most testing clients opted for OFBST, followed by BBST and lastly, PDBBT. Those who self-assessed as less healthy were more likely to opt for PDBBT which likely facilitated linkage. Results show importance of continued provision of all strategies in order to meet needs of different populations, and may be useful to inform both HIVST kit stock projections and tailoring of HIVST programs to meet the needs of different populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37848810
doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08624-y
pii: 10.1186/s12879-023-08624-y
pmc: PMC10583299
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
973Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
AIDS Behav. 2016 Apr;20(4):870-9
pubmed: 26438487
AIDS Behav. 2018 Feb;22(2):560-568
pubmed: 28699017
Global Health. 2011 May 15;7:13
pubmed: 21575149
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 15;14(4):e0215353
pubmed: 30986228
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017 May 5;17(1):11
pubmed: 28476153
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2022 Oct;19(5):394-408
pubmed: 35904695
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Mar;22 Suppl 1:e25244
pubmed: 30907505
BMC Med. 2020 Dec 3;18(1):381
pubmed: 33267890
Lancet HIV. 2018 Jun;5(6):e277-e290
pubmed: 29703707
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 31;13:698
pubmed: 23898942
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018 Feb;31(1):14-24
pubmed: 29232277
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jul 07;38:100991
pubmed: 34278282
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009 Jul;23(7):571-6
pubmed: 19530953
Trop Med Int Health. 2010 May;15(5):574-9
pubmed: 20214762
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(Suppl 4):
pubmed: 34275867
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(Suppl 4):
pubmed: 34275873
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 16;73(4):e1018-e1028
pubmed: 34398952
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Jan;21(1):
pubmed: 29314658
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Nov 01;97(11):764-776
pubmed: 31673192
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Dec;9(12):e1632-e1633
pubmed: 34735863
AIDS Care. 2016;28 Suppl 3:74-82
pubmed: 27421054
BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 09;14:1053
pubmed: 25301572
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Jun 1;72 Suppl 1:S1-4
pubmed: 27331583
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):490
pubmed: 32293370
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jun;8(6):e744-e745
pubmed: 32446337
AIDS Care. 2020 May;32(sup2):206-213
pubmed: 32164420
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(Suppl 4):
pubmed: 34275865
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Mar;22 Suppl 1:e25243
pubmed: 30907498
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Mar;22 Suppl 1:e25253
pubmed: 30907496
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(Suppl 4):
pubmed: 34275877
PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 21;14(11):e1002442
pubmed: 29161260
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Mar;22 Suppl 1:e25249
pubmed: 30907517