Baseline and acquired resistance to bedaquiline, linezolid and pretomanid, and impact on treatment outcomes in four tuberculosis clinical trials containing pretomanid.
Journal
PLOS global public health
ISSN: 2767-3375
Titre abrégé: PLOS Glob Public Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918283779606676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
18
04
2023
accepted:
14
09
2023
medline:
18
10
2023
pubmed:
18
10
2023
entrez:
18
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Bedaquiline (B), pretomanid (Pa) and linezolid (L) are key components of new regimens for treating rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB). However, there is limited information on the global prevalence of resistance to these drugs and the impact of resistance on treatment outcomes. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) phenotypic drug susceptibility and whole-genome sequence (WGS) data, as well as patient profiles from 4 pretomanid-containing trials-STAND, Nix-TB, ZeNix and SimpliciTB-were used to investigate the rates of baseline resistance (BR) and acquired resistance (AR) to BPaL drugs, as well as their genetic basis, risk factors and impact on treatment outcomes. Data from >1,000 TB patients enrolled from 2015 to 2020 in 12 countries was assessed. We identified 2 (0.3%) participants with linezolid BR. Pretomanid BR was also rare, with similar rates across TB drug resistance types (0-2.1%). In contrast, bedaquiline BR was more prevalent among participants with highly resistant TB or longer prior treatment histories than those with newly diagnosed disease (5.2-6.3% vs. 0-0.3%). Bedaquiline BR was a risk factor for bacteriological failure or relapse in Nix-TB/ZeNix; 3/12 (25%, 95% CI 5-57%) participants with vs. 6/185 (3.2%, 1.2-6.9%) without bedaquiline BR. Across trials, we observed no linezolid AR, and only 3 cases of bedaquiline AR, including 2 participants with poor adherence. Overall, pretomanid AR was also rare, except in ZeNix patients with bedaquiline BR. WGS analyses revealed novel mutations in canonical resistant genes and, in 7 MTB isolates, the genetic determinants could not be identified. The overall low rates of BR to linezolid and pretomanid, and to a lesser extent to bedaquiline, observed in the pretomanid trials are in support of the worldwide implementation of BPaL-based regimens. Similarly, the overall low AR rates observed suggest BPaL drugs are better protected in the regimens trialed here than in other regimens combining bedaquiline with more, but less effective drugs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37851685
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002283
pii: PGPH-D-23-00590
pmc: PMC10584172
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0002283Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Timm et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2021 Apr 1;25(4):305-314
pubmed: 33762075
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 30;11(1):19431
pubmed: 34593898
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Dec 20;66(12):e0053122
pubmed: 36448833
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Mar 1;72(3):684-690
pubmed: 28031270
PLoS Pathog. 2020 Feb 7;16(2):e1008287
pubmed: 32032366
Science. 2005 Jan 14;307(5707):223-7
pubmed: 15591164
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jul 1;72(7):1901-1906
pubmed: 28387862
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2021 Nov 05;25:100285
pubmed: 34816020
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Dec;7(12):1048-1058
pubmed: 31732485
Eur Respir J. 2021 Jun 10;57(6):
pubmed: 34112716
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2023 Dec;12(1):2178243
pubmed: 36752055
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2009 Jan;89(1):84-90
pubmed: 18851927
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Jan 19;60(1):e0291920
pubmed: 34705538
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 May 29;77(6):1685-1693
pubmed: 35260883
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jun 4;55(6):
pubmed: 32060065
Microb Genom. 2021 Dec;7(12):
pubmed: 34889724
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Aug;46(8):2720-2
pubmed: 12121966
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Oct 21;58(11):
pubmed: 32907992
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 May 24;61(6):
pubmed: 28320727
Mol Cell. 2007 May 11;26(3):393-402
pubmed: 17499045
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 10;9(7):e102135
pubmed: 25010492
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Jul 19;66(7):e0032222
pubmed: 35758754
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):893-902
pubmed: 32130813
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Jul;6(7):e28
pubmed: 29976444
Science. 2008 Nov 28;322(5906):1392-5
pubmed: 19039139
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Dec 16;65(1):
pubmed: 33077652
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;27(3):985-987
pubmed: 33622487
Eur Respir J. 2022 Mar 24;59(3):
pubmed: 34503982
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Apr;7(4):603-15
pubmed: 25973226
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jun;71(6):1532-9
pubmed: 27076101
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;22(4):496-506
pubmed: 34780706
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Nov;2(11):e604-e616
pubmed: 34796339
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 29;15(1):71
pubmed: 28351427
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Mar 29;4(2):dlac029
pubmed: 35356403
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 1;387(9):810-823
pubmed: 36053506
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Sep 20;66(9):e0090422
pubmed: 35920665
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2018 Jul;111:20-30
pubmed: 30029909
Nature. 2000 Jun 22;405(6789):962-6
pubmed: 10879539
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Aug 1;75(8):2031-2043
pubmed: 32361756
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Sep 22;61(10):
pubmed: 28760892
Lancet Microbe. 2020 Aug;1(4):e165-e174
pubmed: 32803174