Antibody Persistence Following Administration of a Hexavalent DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T Vaccine Versus Separate DTwP-HB-PRP~T and IPV Vaccines and Safety and Immunogenicity of a Booster Dose of DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T Administered With an MMR Vaccine in Healthy Infants in India.


Journal

The Pediatric infectious disease journal
ISSN: 1532-0987
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Infect Dis J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8701858

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline: 16 11 2023
pubmed: 18 10 2023
entrez: 18 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Antibody persistence of a whole-cell pertussis-containing hexavalent vaccine (DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T) and its co- or sequential administration with measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine were evaluated. Phase III, open-label, randomized, multicenter study in India. Healthy toddlers 12-24 months of age who had received DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T or separate DTwP-HB-PRP~T+IPV primary vaccination at 6-8, 10-12 and 14-16 weeks of age received a DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T booster concomitantly with MMR (N = 336) or 28 days before MMR (N = 340). Participants had received a first dose of measles vaccine. Immunogenicity assessment used validated assays and safety was by parental reports. All analyses were descriptive. All participants had prebooster anti-T ≥0.01 IU/mL and anti-polio 1 and 3 ≥8 1/dil, and ≥96.5% had anti-D ≥0.01 IU/mL, anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL, anti-polio 2 ≥8 1/dil and anti-PRP ≥0.15 µg/mL; for pertussis, antibody persistence was similar in each group. Postbooster immunogenicity for DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T was similar for each antigen in each group: ≥99.5% of participants had anti-D ≥0.01 IU/mL, anti-T ≥0.01 IU/mL, anti-polio 1, 2 and 3 >8 1/dil, anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL and anti-PRP ≥1 µg/mL; for pertussis, vaccine response was similar in each group [72.0%-75.9% (anti-PT), 80.8%-81.4% (anti-FIM), 77.6%-79.5% (anti-PRN), 78.2%-80.8% (anti-FHA)]. There was no difference in MMR immunogenicity between groups, and no difference in DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T booster immunogenicity based on the primary series. There were no safety concerns. DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T antibody persistence was similar to licensed comparators. Booster immunogenicity was robust after DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T with or without MMR, and MMR immunogenicity was not affected by coadministration with DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T. CTRI/2020/04/024843.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Antibody persistence of a whole-cell pertussis-containing hexavalent vaccine (DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T) and its co- or sequential administration with measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine were evaluated.
METHODS METHODS
Phase III, open-label, randomized, multicenter study in India. Healthy toddlers 12-24 months of age who had received DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T or separate DTwP-HB-PRP~T+IPV primary vaccination at 6-8, 10-12 and 14-16 weeks of age received a DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T booster concomitantly with MMR (N = 336) or 28 days before MMR (N = 340). Participants had received a first dose of measles vaccine. Immunogenicity assessment used validated assays and safety was by parental reports. All analyses were descriptive.
RESULTS RESULTS
All participants had prebooster anti-T ≥0.01 IU/mL and anti-polio 1 and 3 ≥8 1/dil, and ≥96.5% had anti-D ≥0.01 IU/mL, anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL, anti-polio 2 ≥8 1/dil and anti-PRP ≥0.15 µg/mL; for pertussis, antibody persistence was similar in each group. Postbooster immunogenicity for DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T was similar for each antigen in each group: ≥99.5% of participants had anti-D ≥0.01 IU/mL, anti-T ≥0.01 IU/mL, anti-polio 1, 2 and 3 >8 1/dil, anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL and anti-PRP ≥1 µg/mL; for pertussis, vaccine response was similar in each group [72.0%-75.9% (anti-PT), 80.8%-81.4% (anti-FIM), 77.6%-79.5% (anti-PRN), 78.2%-80.8% (anti-FHA)]. There was no difference in MMR immunogenicity between groups, and no difference in DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T booster immunogenicity based on the primary series. There were no safety concerns.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T antibody persistence was similar to licensed comparators. Booster immunogenicity was robust after DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T with or without MMR, and MMR immunogenicity was not affected by coadministration with DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY INDIA NUMBER UNASSIGNED
CTRI/2020/04/024843.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37851978
doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000004118
pii: 00006454-202312000-00030
doi:

Substances chimiques

Vaccines, Combined 0
Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine 0
Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated 0
Antibodies, Bacterial 0
Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine 0
Hepatitis B Antibodies 0
Haemophilus Vaccines 0
Hepatitis B Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1128-1135

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Decker M, Edwards K, Bogaerts H. Combination vaccines. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA, Edwards KM, eds. Vaccines. 7th ed. PA, USA: Elsevier; 2018. 198–227.
Indian Academy of Pediatrics. IAP immunization timetable 2014: IAP recommended vaccines for routine use. Available at: https://immunizeindia.org/files/immschedule.pdf . Accessed May 9, 2023.
Mangarule S, Palkar S, Mitra M, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a hexavalent DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T vaccine versus separate DTwP-HB-PRP~T and IPV vaccines in healthy infants in India. Vaccine X. 2022;10:100137.
Mangarule S, Palkar S, Mitra M, et al. Antibody persistence following administration of a hexavalent DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T vaccine versus separate DTwP-HB-PRP~T and IPV vaccines at 12-24 months of age and safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T in healthy infants in India. Vaccine X. 2022;11:100190.
Mangarule S, Prasanth S, Kawade A, et al. Lot-to-lot consistency of a hexavalent DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP~T vaccine and non-inferiority to separate DTwP-HB-PRP~T and IPV antigen-matching vaccines at 6-8, 10-12, and 14-16 weeks of age co-administered with oral rotavirus vaccine in healthy infants in India: a multi-center, randomized, controlled study. Vaccine X. 2022;12:100216.
WHO. WHO Prequalified Vaccines. Available at: https://extranet.who.int/gavi/PQ_Web/ . Accessed May 9, 2023.
Singh N, Madkaikar NJ, Gokhale PM, et al. New drugs and clinical trials rules 2019: Changes in responsibilities of the ethics committee. Perspect Clin Res. 2020;11:37–43.
Itell HL, McGuire EP, Muresan P, et al. Development and application of a multiplex assay for the simultaneous measurement of antibody responses elicited by common childhood vaccines. Vaccine. 2018;36:5600–5608.
Varghese K, Bartlett W, Zheng L, et al. A new electrochemiluminescence-based multiplex assay for the assessment of human antibody responses to bordetella pertussis vaccines. Infect Dis Ther. 2021;10:2539–2561.
Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17:873–890.
WHO. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19. 11 March 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 . Accessed May 9, 2023.

Auteurs

Somnath Mangarule (S)

From the Sanofi, Lyon, France.

Prashanth Siddaiah (P)

Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Cheluvamba Hospital, Mysore, India.

Anand Kawade (A)

Vadu Rural Health Program, King Edward Memorial Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.

Ravi Mandyam Dhati (RM)

JSS Hospital and Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, India.

Inumarthi Vara Padmavathi (IV)

Victoria Government Hospital, Visakhapatnam, India.

Sonali Palkar (S)

Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, India.

Virendranath Tripathi (V)

Prakhar Hospital Pvt Ltd, Kanpur, India.

Raghvendra Singh (R)

Maulana Azad Medical College & Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Kudyar Palvi (K)

Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Monjori Mitra (M)

Institute of Child Health, Kolkata, India.

Ranjitha Shetty (R)

Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.

Julie Leclercq (J)

Aixial, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Venkata Jayanth Midde (VJ)

Sanofi Healthcare India Private Limited, India.

Kucku Varghese (K)

Sanofi, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania.

Sreeramulu Reddy Kandukuri (SR)

Sanofi, Hyderabad, India.

Darshna Kukian (D)

Sanofi, Hyderabad, India.

Fernando Noriega (F)

Sanofi, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH