Can ChatGPT be the Plastic Surgeon's New Digital Assistant? A Bibliometric Analysis and Scoping Review of ChatGPT in Plastic Surgery Literature.
Artificial intelligence
ChatGPT
Clinical practice
Ethics
Medical education
Patient education
Plastic surgery
Research
Journal
Aesthetic plastic surgery
ISSN: 1432-5241
Titre abrégé: Aesthetic Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7701756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Oct 2023
18 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
19
08
2023
accepted:
30
09
2023
medline:
19
10
2023
pubmed:
19
10
2023
entrez:
18
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot that uses natural language processing (NLP) to interact in a humanlike manner, has made significant contributions to various healthcare fields, including plastic surgery. However, its widespread use has raised ethical and security concerns. This study examines the presence of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, in the literature of plastic surgery. A bibliometric analysis and scoping review of the ChatGPT plastic surgery literature were performed. PubMed was queried using the search term "ChatGPT" to identify all biomedical literature on ChatGPT, with only studies related to plastic, reconstructive, or aesthetic surgery topics being considered eligible for inclusion. The analysis included 30 out of 724 articles retrieved from PubMed, focusing on publications from December 2022 to July 2023. Four key areas of research emerged: applications in research/creation of original work, clinical application, surgical education, and ethics/commentary on previous studies. The versatility of ChatGPT in research, its potential in surgical education, and its role in enhancing patient education were explored. Ethical concerns regarding patient privacy, plagiarism, and the accuracy of information obtained from ChatGPT-generated sources were also highlighted. While ethical concerns persist, the study underscores the potential of ChatGPT in plastic surgery research and practice, emphasizing the need for careful utilization and collaboration to optimize its benefits while minimizing risks. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot that uses natural language processing (NLP) to interact in a humanlike manner, has made significant contributions to various healthcare fields, including plastic surgery. However, its widespread use has raised ethical and security concerns. This study examines the presence of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, in the literature of plastic surgery.
METHODS
METHODS
A bibliometric analysis and scoping review of the ChatGPT plastic surgery literature were performed. PubMed was queried using the search term "ChatGPT" to identify all biomedical literature on ChatGPT, with only studies related to plastic, reconstructive, or aesthetic surgery topics being considered eligible for inclusion.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The analysis included 30 out of 724 articles retrieved from PubMed, focusing on publications from December 2022 to July 2023. Four key areas of research emerged: applications in research/creation of original work, clinical application, surgical education, and ethics/commentary on previous studies. The versatility of ChatGPT in research, its potential in surgical education, and its role in enhancing patient education were explored. Ethical concerns regarding patient privacy, plagiarism, and the accuracy of information obtained from ChatGPT-generated sources were also highlighted.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
While ethical concerns persist, the study underscores the potential of ChatGPT in plastic surgery research and practice, emphasizing the need for careful utilization and collaboration to optimize its benefits while minimizing risks.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V
METHODS
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 37853081
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03709-0
pii: 10.1007/s00266-023-03709-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Références
Miller LE, Bhattacharyya D, Miller VM, Bhattacharyya M (2023) Recent trend in artificial intelligence-assisted biomedical publishing: a quantitative bibliometric analysis. Cureus 15:e39224. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39224
doi: 10.7759/cureus.39224
pubmed: 37337487
pmcid: 10277011
Gupta R, Park JB, Bisht C et al (2023) Expanding cosmetic plastic surgery research using chatgpt. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad069
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad069
pubmed: 37647888
pmcid: 10349644
Gupta R, Herzog I, Weisberger J et al (2023) Utilization of chatgpt for plastic surgery research: friend or foe? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 80:145–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.03.004
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.03.004
pubmed: 37023599
Gupta R, Pande P, Herzog I et al (2023) Application of ChatGPT in cosmetic plastic surgery: ally or antagonist? Aesthet Surg J 43:NP587–NP590. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad042
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad042
pubmed: 36840479
Seth I, Cox A, Xie Y et al (2023) Evaluating chatbot efficacy for answering frequently asked questions in plastic surgery: a chatgpt case study focused on breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad140
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad140
pubmed: 37392428
Xie Y, Seth I, Hunter-Smith DJ et al (2023) Aesthetic surgery advice and counseling from artificial intelligence: a rhinoplasty consultation with ChatGPT. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03338-7
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03338-7
pubmed: 37626139
Cox A, Seth I, Xie Y et al (2023) Utilizing ChatGPT-4 for providing medical information on blepharoplasties to patients. Aesthet Surg J 43:NP658–NP662. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad096
Xie Y, Seth I, Rozen WM, Hunter-Smith DJ (2023) Evaluation of the artificial intelligence chatbot on breast reconstruction and its efficacy in surgical research: a case study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03443-7
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03443-7
pubmed: 37626139
Kavian JA, Wilkey HL, Patel PA, Boyd CJ (2023) Harvesting the power of artificial intelligence for surgery: uses, implications, and ethical considerations. Am Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348231175454
Bassiri-Tehrani B, Cress PE (2023) Unleashing the power of chatgpt: revolutionizing plastic surgery and beyond. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad135
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad135
pubmed: 37540899
pmcid: 10501745
Najafali D, Camacho JM, Reiche E et al (2023) Truth or lies? the pitfalls and limitations of chatgpt in systematic review creation. Aesthet Surg J 43:NP654–NP655. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad093
Gupta R, Bagdady K, Mailey BA (2023) Response to: truth or lies? the pitfalls and limitations of ChatGPT in systematic review creation. Aesthet Surg J 43:NP656–NP657. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad108
Najafali D, Hinson C, Camacho JM et al (2023) Can chatbots assist with grant writing in plastic surgery? utilizing ChatGPT to start an R01 grant. Aesthet Surg J 43:NP663–NP665. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad116
Najafali D, Camacho JM, Galbraith LG et al (2023) Ask and you shall receive: OpenAI ChatGPT writes us an editorial on using chatbots in gender affirmation surgery and strategies to increase widespread adoption. Aesthet Surg J 43(9):NP715–NP717. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad119
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad119
pubmed: 37185632
pmcid: 10434977
Weidman AA, Valentine L, Chung KC, Lin SJ (2023) Openai’s chatgpt and its role in plastic surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg 151:1111–1113. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010342
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010342
pubmed: 37185379
Gupta R, Herzog I, Park JB et al (2023) Performance of chatgpt on the plastic surgery inservice training examination. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad128
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad128
pubmed: 37647888
pmcid: 10349644
Humar P, Asaad M, Bengur FB, Nguyen V (2023) ChatGPT is equivalent to first year plastic surgery residents: evaluation of ChatGPT on the plastic surgery in-service exam. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad130
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad130
pubmed: 37706281
Kleebayoon A, Wiwanitkit V (2023) Utilization of ChatGPT for plastic surgery research: comment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 82:275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.04.084
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.04.084
pubmed: 37209600
Kang Y, Xia Z, Zhu L (2023) When chatgpt meets plastic surgeons. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03372-5
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03372-5
pubmed: 37697089
Zhou J, Jia Y, Qiu Y, Lin L (2023) The potential of applying chatgpt to extract keywords of medical literature in plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad158
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad158
pubmed: 37462665
Kleebayoon A, Wiwanitkit V (2023) Rhinoplasty consultation with ChatGPT. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03394-z
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03394-z
pubmed: 37814041
Tian WM, Sergesketter AR, Hollenbeck ST (2023) The role of chatgpt in microsurgery: assessing content quality and potential applications. J Reconstr Microsurg. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2098-6509
doi: 10.1055/a-2098-6509
pubmed: 37225130
Gupta R, Lu N, Firouzbakht PK, Mailey BA (2023) Commentary on: unleashing the power of chatgpt: revolutionizing plastic surgery and beyond. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad161
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad161
pubmed: 37647888
pmcid: 10349644
Abi-Rafeh J, Xu HH, Kazan R (2023) Preservation of human creativity in plastic surgery research on chatgpt. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad162
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad162
pubmed: 37610253
Xie Y, Seth I, Hunter-Smith DJ, et al (2023) Response to “Rhinoplasty Consultation with ChatGPT” by Kleebayoon et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03417-9
Buzzaccarini G, Degliuomini RS, Borin M (2023) The artificial intelligence application in aesthetic medicine: how ChatGPT can revolutionize the aesthetic world. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03416-w
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03416-w
pubmed: 37758854
Cevallos PC, Nazerali RS (2023) Commentary on: performance of chatgpt on the plastic surgery inservice training examination. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad171
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad171
pubmed: 37265091
Lanzano G (2023) Harnessing the potential of chatgpt in breast reconstruction: a revolution in patient communication and education. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03427-7
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03427-7
pubmed: 37286844
Najafali D, Dorafshar AH (2023) Commentary on: evaluating chatbot efficacy for answering frequently asked questions in plastic surgery: a chatgpt case study focused on breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad186
doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad186
pubmed: 37287210
pmcid: 10349645
Najafali D, Reiche E, Camacho JM et al (2023) Let’s chat about chatbots: additional thoughts on ChatGPT and its role in plastic surgery along with its ability to perform systematic reviews. Aesthet Surg J 43:NP591–NP592. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad056
Seth I, Xie Y, Rozen WM (2023) Response to “the artificial intelligence application in aesthetic medicine: how chatgpt can revolutionize the aesthetic world” by Buzzaccarini, et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03439-3
doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03439-3
pubmed: 37605017
Castelvecchi D (2022) Are ChatGPT and AlphaCode going to replace programmers? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04383-z
doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-04383-z
pubmed: 36539538
Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.2.105
doi: 10.1136/jech.53.2.105
pubmed: 10396471
pmcid: 1756830
Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S et al (2007) A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol 102:2070–2077. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x
pubmed: 17511753
Rohrich RJ, Weinstein A (2021) Paging dr. google: the changing face of plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 148:104S-107S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000794912.60516.94
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000794912.60516.94
pubmed: 34699506
Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A et al (2023) Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digit Health 2:e0000198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
pubmed: 36812645
pmcid: 9931230
Ali R, Tang OY, Connolly ID et al (2023) Performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Bard on a neurosurgery oral boards preparation question bank. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002551
doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002551
pubmed: 37681953