Genomic prediction based on selective linkage disequilibrium pruning of low-coverage whole-genome sequence variants in a pure Duroc population.
Journal
Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Oct 2023
18 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
23
09
2022
accepted:
14
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
19
10
2023
entrez:
18
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although the accumulation of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data has accelerated the identification of mutations underlying complex traits, its impact on the accuracy of genomic predictions is limited. Reliable genotyping data and pre-selected beneficial loci can be used to improve prediction accuracy. Previously, we reported a low-coverage sequencing genotyping method that yielded 11.3 million highly accurate single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in pigs. Here, we introduce a method termed selective linkage disequilibrium pruning (SLDP), which refines the set of SNPs that show a large gain during prediction of complex traits using whole-genome SNP data. We used the SLDP method to identify and select markers among millions of SNPs based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) prior information. We evaluated the performance of SLDP with respect to three real traits and six simulated traits with varying genetic architectures using two representative models (genomic best linear unbiased prediction and BayesR) on samples from 3579 Duroc boars. SLDP was determined by testing 180 combinations of two core parameters (GWAS P-value thresholds and linkage disequilibrium r The SLDP marker selection method can be incorporated into mainstream prediction models to yield accuracy improvements for traits with a relatively simple genetic architecture, however, it has no significant advantage for traits not controlled by major QTL. The main factors that affect its performance are the genetic architecture of traits and the reliability of GWAS prior information. Our findings can facilitate the application of WGS-based genomic selection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Although the accumulation of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data has accelerated the identification of mutations underlying complex traits, its impact on the accuracy of genomic predictions is limited. Reliable genotyping data and pre-selected beneficial loci can be used to improve prediction accuracy. Previously, we reported a low-coverage sequencing genotyping method that yielded 11.3 million highly accurate single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in pigs. Here, we introduce a method termed selective linkage disequilibrium pruning (SLDP), which refines the set of SNPs that show a large gain during prediction of complex traits using whole-genome SNP data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We used the SLDP method to identify and select markers among millions of SNPs based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) prior information. We evaluated the performance of SLDP with respect to three real traits and six simulated traits with varying genetic architectures using two representative models (genomic best linear unbiased prediction and BayesR) on samples from 3579 Duroc boars. SLDP was determined by testing 180 combinations of two core parameters (GWAS P-value thresholds and linkage disequilibrium r
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The SLDP marker selection method can be incorporated into mainstream prediction models to yield accuracy improvements for traits with a relatively simple genetic architecture, however, it has no significant advantage for traits not controlled by major QTL. The main factors that affect its performance are the genetic architecture of traits and the reliability of GWAS prior information. Our findings can facilitate the application of WGS-based genomic selection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37853325
doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00843-w
pii: 10.1186/s12711-023-00843-w
pmc: PMC10583454
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
72Subventions
Organisme : 948 Program of the Ministry of Agriculture of China
ID : 2012-G1 (4)
Organisme : Science and Technology Innovation Strategy Projects of Guangdong Province
ID : 2019B020203002
Organisme : Open Research Program of State Key Laboratory for Agro-Biotechnology
ID : 2020SKLAB6-25
Informations de copyright
© 2023. ’Institut National de Recherche en Agriculture, Alimentation et Environnement (INRAE).
Références
Nat Genet. 2016 Aug;48(8):965-969
pubmed: 27376236
Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Jan 7;88(1):76-82
pubmed: 21167468
Heredity (Edinb). 2014 Jan;112(1):39-47
pubmed: 23549338
Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1819-29
pubmed: 11290733
Brief Funct Genomics. 2010 Mar;9(2):166-77
pubmed: 20156985
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Dec 1;48(1):95
pubmed: 27905878
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 May 09;47:43
pubmed: 25956961
Gigascience. 2021 Jul 20;10(7):
pubmed: 34282453
Bioinformatics. 2016 May 1;32(9):1420-2
pubmed: 26755623
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jun;103(6):5291-5301
pubmed: 32331884
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Jul;17(7):392-406
pubmed: 27140283
Anim Genet. 2023 Apr;54(2):216-219
pubmed: 36511585
Nat Commun. 2015 Dec 04;6:8658
pubmed: 26635082
Genet Sel Evol. 2020 May 27;52(1):28
pubmed: 32460805
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jun;101(6):5250-5254
pubmed: 29550139
J Anim Sci. 2017 Aug;95(8):3415-3424
pubmed: 28805914
Genet Sel Evol. 2011 May 17;43:18
pubmed: 21575265
PLoS Genet. 2013;9(2):e1003264
pubmed: 23408905
Genet Sel Evol. 2021 Oct 7;53(1):78
pubmed: 34620094
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):4114-29
pubmed: 22720968
Commun Biol. 2020 Aug 28;3(1):472
pubmed: 32859973
PLoS One. 2011 May 04;6(5):e19379
pubmed: 21573248
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Mar 29;49(1):35
pubmed: 28356075
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 09;5(9):
pubmed: 20844593
Cell. 2018 Oct 4;175(2):347-359.e14
pubmed: 30290141
PLoS Genet. 2015 Apr 07;11(4):e1004969
pubmed: 25849665
Genetics. 2007 Dec;177(4):2389-97
pubmed: 18073436
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Aug 09;6(8):2553-61
pubmed: 27317779
Genome Biol. 2020 Jun 17;21(1):146
pubmed: 32552725
Front Genet. 2022 Nov 09;13:1039838
pubmed: 36437945
Genetics. 2008 Jun;179(2):1045-55
pubmed: 18505874
Genetics. 2016 Aug;203(4):1871-83
pubmed: 27235308
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Jan 24;51(1):2
pubmed: 30678638
Front Genet. 2019 Apr 05;10:302
pubmed: 31024621
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Feb;101(2):1292-1296
pubmed: 29153527
Genet Sel Evol. 2022 Sep 24;54(1):65
pubmed: 36153511
PLoS One. 2021 May 10;16(5):e0235554
pubmed: 33970915
Genetics. 2010 Jun;185(2):623-31
pubmed: 20308278
Genetics. 2014 Dec;198(4):1671-84
pubmed: 25233989
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Dec 5;51(1):72
pubmed: 31805849
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Sep 17;47:71
pubmed: 26381777
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Oct 10;50(1):49
pubmed: 30314431
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Oct 21;51(1):58
pubmed: 31638889
Am J Hum Genet. 2012 Dec 7;91(6):1011-21
pubmed: 23217325
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4414-23
pubmed: 18946147
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Jun 29;48(1):49
pubmed: 27357580
Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Jul 15;46:41
pubmed: 25022768
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Jun;94(6):3202-11
pubmed: 21605789