Utility of a penile compression device for the quality of life in male patients with urinary incontinence after prostatectomy (the MORE study): a randomized prospective study.
Quality of life
Radical prostatectomy
Urinary incontinence
Journal
BMC research notes
ISSN: 1756-0500
Titre abrégé: BMC Res Notes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462768
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Oct 2023
18 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
12
06
2023
accepted:
11
10
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
19
10
2023
entrez:
18
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To verify the effects of penile clamping on the degree of stress urinary incontinence and quality of life in post-radical prostatectomy patients. Thirty-seven patients suffering from stress urinary incontinence after undergoing radical prostatectomy were enrolled. A total of 19 and 18 patients were analyzed in the non-clamp and clamp groups, respectively. The mean ages of the patients in non-clamp and clamp groups were 68.3 ± 7.1 years and 71.2 ± 4.8 years, respectively; the mean time after radical prostatectomy was 28.9 ± 44.0 months and 26.2 ± 39.0 months, respectively. The penile clamp used was the CLAMPMED® (URINE CONTROL CLAMP) size M (MURANAKA MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS Co., Ltd.). Specific urinary care pads (Sawayaka Pad for Men, Small Quantity®, Unicharm Corporation), were provided; the average daily usage was monitored for four weeks. The quality of life was evaluated using the King's Health Questionnaire. The average daily use of urinary care pads was significantly reduced in the clamp group than in the non-clamp group (-0.83 ± 1.51 vs. -0.16 ± 0.69, P = 0.0071). King's Health Questionnaire scores did not change significantly in either group. Wearing the CLAMPMED® reduced the amount of urinary incontinence but did not improve the quality of life. The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1052230083). Registered 2 August, 2023.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37853453
doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06564-z
pii: 10.1186/s13104-023-06564-z
pmc: PMC10585839
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
277Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Bauer RM, Bastian PJ, Gozzi C, Stief CG. Postprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol. 2009;55:322–33.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.10.029
pubmed: 18963418
Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN, Young Academic Urologists Functional Urology Group. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63:681–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.034
pubmed: 23219375
Viana R, Viana S, Neto F, Mascarenhas T. Adaptation and validation of the King’s Health Questionnaire in Portuguese women with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1027–33.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2628-6
pubmed: 25653033
Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:1374–9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11006.x
pubmed: 9422015
Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wilderäng U, Thorsteinsdottir T, et al. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Eur Urol. 2015;68:216–25.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029
pubmed: 25770484
Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, Cecconi F, Marzocco M, Tosto A, et al. Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2005;48:734–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.004
pubmed: 16002204
Moore KN, Schieman S, Ackerman T, Dzus HY, Metcalfe JB, Voaklander DC. Assessing comfort, safety, and patient satisfaction with three commonly used penile compression devices. Urology. 2004;63:150–4.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.034
pubmed: 14751370
Barnard J, Westenberg AM. The penile clamp: medieval pain or makeshift gain? Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:115–6.
doi: 10.1002/nau.22597
pubmed: 24668466
Levy A, Fader M, Bader D, Gefen A. Penile compression clamps: a model of the internal mechanical state of penile soft tissues. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:1645–50.
doi: 10.1002/nau.23172
pubmed: 27862230
Suzuki M, Ikegaya H, Idota N, Kawai T, Sato Y, Kume H. Penile size and stretched rate in a Japanese male population: a cross-sectional cadaveric study. Int J Urol. 2019;26:936–7.
doi: 10.1111/iju.14052
pubmed: 31304609
Prause N, Park J, Leung S, Miller G. Women’s preferences for penis size: a new research method using selection among 3D models. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133079.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133079
pubmed: 26332467
pmcid: 4558040