Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Reserve After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.

Chronic coronary syndrome Coronary flow reserve Drug-eluting stents Fractional flow reserve Percutaneous coronary intervention

Journal

Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society
ISSN: 1347-4820
Titre abrégé: Circ J
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101137683

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 19 10 2023
pubmed: 19 10 2023
entrez: 19 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) provides prognostic information, but limited data are available regarding prognostication using post-PCI coronary flow reserve (CFR). In this study we aimed to assess the prognostic value of post-procedural FFR and CFR for target vessel failure (TVF) after PCI.Methods and Results: This lesion-based post-hoc pooled analysis of previously published registry data involved 466 patients with chronic coronary syndrome with single-vessel disease who underwent pre- and post-PCI FFR and CFR measurements, and were followed-up to determine the predictors of TVF. The prognostic value of post-PCI CFR and FFR was compared with that of FFR or CFR alone. Post-PCI FFR/CFR discordant results were observed in 42.5%, and 10.3% of patients had documented TVF. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff values of post-PCI FFR and CFR to predict the occurrence of TVF were 0.85 and 2.26, respectively. Significant differences in TVF were detected according to post-PCI FFR (≤0.85 vs. >0.85, P=0.007) and post-PCI CFR (<2.26 vs. ≥2.26, P<0.001). Post-PCI FFR ≤0.85 and post-PCI CFR <2.26 were independent prognostic predictors. After PCI completion, discordant results between FFR and CFR were not uncommon. Post-PCI CFR categorization showed incremental prognostic value for predicting TVF independent of post-PCI FFR risk stratification.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) provides prognostic information, but limited data are available regarding prognostication using post-PCI coronary flow reserve (CFR). In this study we aimed to assess the prognostic value of post-procedural FFR and CFR for target vessel failure (TVF) after PCI.Methods and Results: This lesion-based post-hoc pooled analysis of previously published registry data involved 466 patients with chronic coronary syndrome with single-vessel disease who underwent pre- and post-PCI FFR and CFR measurements, and were followed-up to determine the predictors of TVF. The prognostic value of post-PCI CFR and FFR was compared with that of FFR or CFR alone. Post-PCI FFR/CFR discordant results were observed in 42.5%, and 10.3% of patients had documented TVF. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff values of post-PCI FFR and CFR to predict the occurrence of TVF were 0.85 and 2.26, respectively. Significant differences in TVF were detected according to post-PCI FFR (≤0.85 vs. >0.85, P=0.007) and post-PCI CFR (<2.26 vs. ≥2.26, P<0.001). Post-PCI FFR ≤0.85 and post-PCI CFR <2.26 were independent prognostic predictors.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
After PCI completion, discordant results between FFR and CFR were not uncommon. Post-PCI CFR categorization showed incremental prognostic value for predicting TVF independent of post-PCI FFR risk stratification.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37853607
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0293
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Hiroki Ueno (H)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Masahiro Hoshino (M)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Eisuke Usui (E)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Tomoyo Sugiyama (T)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Yoshihisa Kanaji (Y)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Masahiro Hada (M)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Toru Misawa (T)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Tatsuhiro Nagamine (T)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Yoshihiro Hanyu (Y)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Kai Nogami (K)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Kodai Sayama (K)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Kazuki Matsuda (K)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Tatsuya Sakamoto (T)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Taishi Yonetsu (T)

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.

Tetsuo Sasano (T)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.

Tsunekazu Kakuta (T)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital.

Classifications MeSH