Is the Presence of Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion Relevant for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse?

3D transperineal ultrasound pelvic floor pelvic organ prolapse uterine prolapse

Journal

Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
ISSN: 1550-9613
Titre abrégé: J Ultrasound Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8211547

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Oct 2023
Historique:
revised: 23 09 2023
received: 26 06 2023
accepted: 01 10 2023
medline: 19 10 2023
pubmed: 19 10 2023
entrez: 19 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To determine if the addition of the assessment of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion to the measurement of the difference in the pubis-uterine fundus distance between rest and with the Valsalva maneuver could increase the diagnostic capacity of ultrasound for uterine prolapse (UP). This multicenter, observational and prospective study included 145 patients. Ultrasound assessment was performed, establishing the diagnosis of UP as a difference between the pubic-uterine fundus distance at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver ≥15 mm (standard technique), while LAM avulsion was defined as an abnormal LAM insertion in three central slices using multislice ultrasound. A binary multivariate logistic regression model was made using nonautomated methods to predict surgical UP (general population, premenopausal, and postmenopausal patients), including the difference between the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver as well as LAM avulsion. A total of 143 patients completed the study. The addition of LAM avulsion criteria to the standard dynamic distance-based protocol for the diagnosis of UP resulted in a higher sensitivity for the general population (79.7 vs 68.1%) as well as for premenopausal (89.3 vs 79.9%) and postmenopausal patients (76 vs 66.1%). In contrast, the standard technique showed a higher specificity than the model based on the standard technique associated with LAM avulsion for the general population (89.2 vs 74.3%) and premenopausal women (91.7 vs 63.2%). For postmenopausal patients, the model based on the standard technique associated with LAM avulsion had a higher sensitivity (76 vs 66.1%) and specificity (91.7 vs 86.8%) than the ultrasound diagnosis of UP. The implementation of the assessment of LAM avulsion in the ultrasound diagnosis of UP is useful in postmenopausal patients, increasing sensitivity and specificity relative to the ultrasound assessment based only on the difference between the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37853913
doi: 10.1002/jum.16356
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Références

Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24:1783-1790.
Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson FM. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:1201-1206.
Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1096-1100.
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:10-17.
Dietz HP, Lekskulchai O. Ultrasound assessment of prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29:688-691.
Shek KL, Dietz HP. What is abnormal uterine descent on translabial ultrasound? Int Urogynecol J 2015; 26:1783-1787.
Eisenberg VH, Chantarasorn V, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Does levator ani injury affect cystocele type? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36:618-623.
Green TH Jr. Urinary stress incontinence: differential diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122:368-400.
Chantarasorn V, Dietz HP. Diagnosis of cystocele type by clinical examination and pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39:710-714.
García-Mejido JA, Ramos-Vega Z, Armijo-Sánchez A, Fernández-Palacín A, García-Jimenez R, Sainz JA. Differential diagnosis of middle compartment pelvic organ prolapse with transperineal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 2021; 32:2219-2225.
García-Mejido JA, Ramos Vega Z, Armijo Sánchez A, Fernández-Palacín A, Fernández CB, Sainz Bueno JA. Interobserver variability of ultrasound measurements for the differential diagnosis of uterine prolapse and cervical elongation without uterine prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33:2825-2831.
Dietz HP, Steensma AB. Posterior compartment prolapse on two-dimensional and three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermotility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26:73-77.
Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. A 3D finite element model of anterior vaginal wall support to evaluate mechanisms underlying cystocele formation. J Biomech 2009; 42:1371-1377.
Abdool Z, Shek K, Dietz H. The effect of levator avulsion on hiatal dimensions and function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201:89.e1-89.e5.
Dietz H, Simpson J. Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 115:979-984.
Delancey JO, Hurd WW. Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91:364-368.
DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:295-302.
Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER, FitzGerald MP, Brubaker L. Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195:1837-1840.
Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, DeLancey JO. The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:1438-1443.
Volloyhaug I, Morkved S, Salvesen K. Association between pelvic floor muscle trauma and pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after delivery. Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27:39-45.
Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2015; 26:1559-1573.
Friedman T, Eslick GD, Dietz HP. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2018; 29:13-21.
Oversand SH, Staff AC, Borstad E, Svenningsen R. The Manchester procedure: anatomical, subjective and sexual outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 2018; 29:1193-1201.
Santis-Moya F, Pineda R, Miranda V. Preoperative ultrasound findings as risk factors of recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 2021; 32:955-960.
García-Mejido JA, Bonomi-Barby MJ, Armijo-Sanchez A, et al. Metodología para el estudio ecográfico transperineal del suelo pélvico. Clin Invest Gynecol Obstet 2021; 48:190-195.
García-Mejido JA, Martín-Martinez A, González-Diaz E, et al. Identification of surgical uterine prolapse in premenopausal patients with clinical or ultrasound criteria? A multicenter comparative study. J Ultrasound Med 2023; 42:2269-2275.
Dietz H, Bernardo M, Kirby A, Shek K. Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 2010; 22:699-704.
Dietz HP, Garnham AP, Rojas RG. Is the levator-urethra gap helpful for diagnosing avulsion? Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27:909-913.
García-Mejido JA, González-Diaz E, Ortega I, Borrero C, Fernández-Palacín A, Sainz-Bueno JA. 2D ultrasound diagnosis of middle compartment prolapse: a multicenter study. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 12:959.
García-Mejido JA, Ramos-Vega Z, Fernández-Palacín A, et al. Predictive model for the diagnosis of uterine prolapse based on transperineal ultrasound. Tomography 2022; 8:1716-1725.
Luo J, Betschart C, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Using stress MRI to analyze the 3D changes in apical ligament geometry from rest to maximal Valsalva: a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J 2014; 25:197-203.
Swenson CW, Smith TM, Luo J, Kolenic GE, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Intraoperative cervix location and apical support stiffness in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216:155.e1-155.e8.
Franco A, Shek K, Kirby A, Fynes M, Dietz H. Avulsion injury and levator hiatal ballooning: two independent risk factorsfor prolapse? Int Urogynecol J 2009; 20:169-170.
Lakovschek IC, Trutnovsky G, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Gold D. Longitudinal study of pelvic floor characteristics before, during, and after pregnancy in nulliparous women. J Ultrasound Med 2022; 41:147-155.
Kubotani JS, Araujo Júnior E, Zanetti MR, Passos JP, de Jármy Di Bella ZI, Júnior JE. Assessing the impact of twin pregnancies on the pelvic floor using 3-dimensional sonography: a pilot study. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33:1179-1183.
Atan IK, Lin S, Dietz HP, Herbison P, Wilson PD, ProLong Study Group. Levator avulsion is associated with pelvic organ prolapse 23 years after the first childbirth. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37:2829-2839.
Kozma B, Larson K, Scott L, et al. Association between pelvic organ prolapse types and levator-urethra gap as measured by 3D transperineal ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37:2849-2854.
Dietz HP, Rozsa D, Subramaniam N, Friedman T. Does vaginal parity alter the association between symptoms and signs of pelvic organ prolapse? J Ultrasound Med 2021; 40:675-679.
Wang Y, Wang H. Transvaginal two-dimensional ultrasound evaluation as a screening tool for levator ani muscle avulsion in postpartum women. J Ultrasound Med 2023; 42:161-169.
García-Mejido JA, Martín-Martinez A, González-Diaz E, et al. Is it possible to diagnose surgical uterine prolapse with Transperineal ultrasound? Multicenter validation of diagnostic software. J Ultrasound Med 2023; 42:2673-2681.

Auteurs

José Antonio García-Mejido (JA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Alicia Martín-Martinez (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Healthcare Complex of Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain.

Rocío García-Jimenez (R)

Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Juan Ramon Jiménez Hospital, Huelva, Spain.

Enrique González-Diaz (E)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Healthcare Complex of Leon (CAULE), Leon, Spain.

María José Núñez-Matas (MJ)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.

Fernando Fernández-Palacín (F)

Department of statistics and operational research, University of Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain.

Sonia Carballo-Rastrilla (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Healthcare Complex of Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain.

Camino Fernández-Fernández (C)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Healthcare Complex of Leon (CAULE), Leon, Spain.

José Antonio Sainz-Bueno (JA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

Classifications MeSH