Insight into antimicrobial resistance at a new beef cattle feedlot in western Canada.

antimicrobial resistance beef cattle production surveillance study water waterborne bacteria

Journal

mSphere
ISSN: 2379-5042
Titre abrégé: mSphere
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674533

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 19 10 2023
pubmed: 19 10 2023
entrez: 19 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In North America, beef production relies on the administration of antimicrobials to manage disease. Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is the most significant disease of beef cattle, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to conventional therapies presents an existential risk to animal welfare and food production. While AMR surveillance programs are poised to help facilitate antimicrobial stewardship and decision making at feedlots, monitoring strategies for large numbers of animals at an individual or group level are time consuming and costly. Accordingly, we completed a pilot investigation of feedlot water bowls, which is an understudied interface between cattle and bacteria. By performing cultivation-dependent and cultivation-independent studies, we demonstrate that water bowl-dwelling bacteria can act as sentinel organisms for clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and that cattle have an impact on the microbial communities in the bowls. Moreover, by sampling water at a feedlot site before animal arrival, we detected resistance to two antibiotics: florfenicol and tulathromycin. After just 4 weeks of operation, multidrug-resistant bacteria were routinely found in most water bowls. A comparison of ARGs encoded by five water bowl bacterial isolates along with previously reported source and wastewater metagenomes to those found in BRD pathogens confirmed the utility of using water samples for AMR surveillance. IMPORTANCE A better understanding of how environmental reservoirs of ARGs in the feedlot relate to those found in animal pathogens will help inform and improve disease management, treatment strategies, and outcomes. Monitoring individual cattle or small groups is invasive, logistically challenging, expensive, and unlikely to gain adoption by the beef cattle industry. Wastewater surveillance has become standard in public health studies and has inspired similar work to better our understanding of AMR in feedlots. We derived our insights from sampling water bowls in a newly established feedlot: a unique opportunity to observe AMR prior to animal arrival and to monitor its development over 2 months. Importantly, the bacterial community of a single water bowl can be influenced by direct contact with hundreds of animals. Our results suggest that water bowl microbiomes are economical and pragmatic sentinels for monitoring relevant AMR mechanisms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37855607
doi: 10.1128/msphere.00317-23
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0031723

Auteurs

Daniel Kos (D)

Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Brittany Schreiner (B)

Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Stuart Thiessen (S)

Namaka Farms, Inc. , Outlook, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Tim McAllister (T)

Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada , Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.

Murray Jelinski (M)

Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Antonio Ruzzini (A)

Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Classifications MeSH