Cognitive performance outcomes: considerations for drug development.


Journal

Journal of patient-reported outcomes
ISSN: 2509-8020
Titre abrégé: J Patient Rep Outcomes
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101722688

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 21 06 2023
accepted: 08 10 2023
medline: 2 11 2023
pubmed: 19 10 2023
entrez: 19 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Ensuring that cognitive assessments are fit for purpose is critical in the evaluation of the clinical benefit of new therapeutic interventions. Although guidelines for Clinical Outcome Assessments (COA) are available, performance outcome (PerfO) assessments, and in particular those assessing cognition (Cog-PerfOs) are more complex and have additional requirements that need to be considered. I outline three areas where further discussion around validation methods for Cog-PerfOs and best practices is warranted: (1) content validity (2) ecological validity, and (3) construct validity in multinational contexts. I conclude with a discussion of several potential avenues for the improvement of validation of Cog-PerfOs used to evaluate the efficacy of medical products that target cognitive symptomatology. These include the involvement of cognitive psychologists in establishing content validity of Cog-PerfOs, evaluating the congruence of laypeople's and expert understanding of cognitive concepts, supplementing qualitative with quantitative evidence when establishing content validity, demonstrating ecological validity, and ensuring normative data are available in multinational contexts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37855938
doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00644-1
pii: 10.1186/s41687-023-00644-1
pmc: PMC10587033
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102

Informations de copyright

© 2023. International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL).

Références

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Mar;27(2):182-9
pubmed: 22294287
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Jan 31;13:42
pubmed: 23368850
J Vis Exp. 2014 Apr 23;(86):
pubmed: 24798174
Value Health. 2023 Jul;26(7):959-967
pubmed: 37385712
Cogn Psychol. 1981 Jul;13(3):434-60
pubmed: 7237993
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 May;10(3):282-306
pubmed: 25987509
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Jan;53(1):146-153
pubmed: 29739255
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79
pubmed: 17034633
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 May;51(3):380-390
pubmed: 30231712
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Nov;51(6):671
pubmed: 30227100
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 26;373(1756):
pubmed: 30104425
Neuropsychol Rev. 2003 Dec;13(4):181-97
pubmed: 15000225
Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Oct 20;7:195
pubmed: 26539107
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022 Apr;28(4):414-423
pubmed: 34027848

Auteurs

Zorana Zupan (Z)

Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Cika Ljubina 18/20, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia. zorana.zupan@f.bg.ac.rs.

Articles similaires

Core Outcome Domains for Elbow Replacement (CODER).

Adam C Watts, Catriona McDaid, Catherine Hewitt et al.
1.00
Humans Arthroplasty, Replacement, Elbow Delphi Technique Patient Satisfaction Activities of Daily Living
Humans Citrus Female Male Aged
Humans Infant, Newborn Pain Measurement Pain Cognition
Humans Self-Control Longitudinal Studies Child, Preschool Child

Classifications MeSH