Identifying value in healthcare transformation initiatives: an evaluation of an approach to benefits realisation.
Evaluation methodology
Healthcare quality improvement
PDSA
Quality improvement methodologies
Quality measurement
Journal
BMJ open quality
ISSN: 2399-6641
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Qual
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101710381
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
received:
16
03
2023
accepted:
25
09
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
20
10
2023
entrez:
19
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Benefits realisation management (BRM) aims to facilitate the process of identifying, measuring and tracking desired benefits derived from a project. Improvement methodology frameworks often describe BRM as integral to identifying and measuring value derived from transformation initiatives within the National Health Service and beyond. Despite this, reporting of benefits realisation plans and methodological approaches to identifying and measuring benefits remains surprisingly scarce.This project aimed to pilot and evaluate the application of a purpose-designed benefits mapping template with seven newly funded transformation projects across three hospitals in the UK. The scope of the template was to identify key project benefits and metrics associated with the project initiatives. Plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were used to capture the approach and utilisation of the template by project teams. These methods also enabled critical review of the template as an enabler to identifying relevant benefits and project metrics.Stakeholder engagement with the templates was variable. This was attributed to clinical pressures induced by the second wave of COVID-19 in the UK. Despite this, teams were able to produce completed templates outlining a number of wide-ranging benefits. Themes of benefits drawn from the maps include patient experience, patient outcomes, staff experience, access to care and efficiency. Qualitative feedback from teams included the reported value of a structured template to help recognise all the potential benefits associated with each project initiative. The PDSA cycles highlighted the template as an early step in BRM. Further components to this process are recommended to include consensus of the key metrics to be measured, a tool that summarises the reporting details of those metrics, and an effective means to collate reported metrics overtime.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37857520
pii: bmjoq-2023-002349
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002349
pmc: PMC10603506
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 11;11(6):e048815
pubmed: 34117048
BMJ. 2013 Jan 28;346:f167
pubmed: 23358487
Cureus. 2017 Mar 2;9(3):e1067
pubmed: 28409068
Educ Prim Care. 2015 Jul;26(4):279-81
pubmed: 26253069
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Aug 01;30(7):508-513
pubmed: 29635294