The influence of topical anesthetic and fluorescein on non-contact tonometry measurements using ultra-high-speed dynamic Scheimpflug.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 10 2023
19 10 2023
Historique:
received:
12
07
2023
accepted:
17
10
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
20
10
2023
entrez:
19
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to investigate the effects of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops on intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT) and biomechanical properties as measured by Corvis ST (CST-Oculus; Wezlar, Germany) in healthy eyes. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 46 healthy patients. The CST measurements were obtained before and immediately after the instillation of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops. Pre-post instillation data were statistically analyzed. IOP measurements were compared to Goldmann's Applanation Tonometry (GAT), which was also performed after drops instillation. Biomechanical parameters analyzed included applanation 1 velocity, applanation 2 velocity, applanation 1 time, applanation 2 time, whole eye movement, deflection amplitude, and stiffness parameter at first applanation. A statistically significant difference in IOP, both for non-corrected IOP (IOPnct) and biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP), was observed before and after the instillation of eyedrops. Despite this statistical significance, the observed difference lacked clinical relevance. The IOPnct demonstrated a significant difference pre and post-anesthetic and fluorescein instillation compared to GAT (14.99 ± 2.27 mmHg pre-instillation and 14.62 ± 2.50 mmHg post-instillation, versus 13.98 ± 2.04 mmHg, with p-values of 0.0014 and 0.0490, respectively). Comparable findings were noted when justaposing bIOP to GAT (14.53 ± 2.10 mmHg pre-instillation and 13.15 ± 2.25 mmHg post-instillation, against 13.98 ± 2.04 mmHg, with p-values of 0.0391 and 0.0022, respectively). Additionally, CCT measurements revealed a statistically significant elevation following the administration of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops (from 544.64 ± 39.85 µm to 586.74 ± 41.71 µm, p < 0.01. None of the analyzed biomechanical parameters showed statistically significant differences after drops instillation. While the administration of topical anesthetic and fluorescein drops induced a statistically significant alteration in both IOPnct and bIOP readings, these changes were not clinically consequential. Furthermore, a notable statistical rise was observed in CCT measurements post-drops instillation, as determined by CST. Yet, corneal biomechanical parameters remained unaffected.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37857798
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45165-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-45165-5
pmc: PMC10587345
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anesthetics, Local
0
Fluoresceins
0
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17864Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Am J Ophthalmol. 1963 Jun;55:1252-3
pubmed: 13949875
Am J Ophthalmol. 1960 May;49:1149-55
pubmed: 14424548
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;153(3):419-427.e1
pubmed: 22018707
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 23;54(1):659-65
pubmed: 23307970
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 May;129(5):562-8
pubmed: 21555607
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2017 Jun;80(3):202-206
pubmed: 28832734
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;39(11):2517-2521
pubmed: 30968328
Ophthalmology. 2007 Nov;114(11):1965-72
pubmed: 17628686
J Glaucoma. 2013 Feb;22(2):156-63
pubmed: 21946549
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;30(6):1287-1294
pubmed: 31744320
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):840-849.e2
pubmed: 22310080
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 17;12:1473-1478
pubmed: 30154644
Ophthalmology. 2019 Dec;126(12):1640-1646
pubmed: 31519385
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct-Dec;60(4):219-225
pubmed: 29450353
J Refract Surg. 2010 Jul;26(7):512-9
pubmed: 19715267
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;101(6):130-195
pubmed: 28559477
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jan;31(1):146-55
pubmed: 15721707
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2019 Oct 17;11:127-133
pubmed: 31802962
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep 18;12:1809-1813
pubmed: 30271114
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 May 11;10:829-34
pubmed: 27274187
Can J Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug;42(4):562-6
pubmed: 17641698
Am J Ophthalmol. 1967 Jul;64(1):158-60
pubmed: 6028628
Ophthalmology. 2001 Oct;108(10):1779-88
pubmed: 11581049
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;90(3):262-7
pubmed: 16488940
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1981 Dec;58(12):1120-6
pubmed: 7325201
Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90
pubmed: 24974815
Cornea. 2015 Jan;34(1):71-7
pubmed: 25393092
J Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;26(4):289-300
pubmed: 20415325
Ophthalmology. 2007 Mar;114(3):454-9
pubmed: 17126403
Ophthalmologe. 2014 Mar;111(3):241-6
pubmed: 23604252
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 31;11(8):e0161742
pubmed: 27580243
BMC Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov 27;12:58
pubmed: 23181800
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct-Dec;59(4):252-254
pubmed: 29450316
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan 15;18(1):7
pubmed: 29334923
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;104(4):563-568
pubmed: 31362932
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016;19(9):943-53
pubmed: 27049961