Safety and upscaling of remote consulting for long-term conditions in primary health care in Nigeria and Tanzania (REaCH trials): stepped-wedge trials of training, mobile data allowance, and implementation.

BACKGROUND

In-person health care poses risks to health workers and patients during pandemics. Remote consultations can mitigate these risks. The REaCH intervention comprised training and mobile data allowance provision for mobile phones to support remotely delivered primary care in Africa compared with no training and mobile data allowance. The aim of this study was to estimate the effects of REaCH among adults with non-communicable diseases on remote and face-to-face consultation rates, patient safety, and trustworthiness of consultations.

METHODS

In these two independent stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials, we enrolled 20 primary care clusters in each of two settings (Oyo State, Nigeria, and Morogoro Region, Tanzania). Eligible clusters had 100 or more patients with diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular or pulmonary disease employing five health workers. Clusters were computer-randomised to one of ten (Nigeria) or one of seven (Tanzania) sequences to receive the REaCH intervention. Only outcome assessors were masked. Primary outcomes were consultation, prescription, and investigation rates, and trustworthiness collected monthly for 12 months (Nigeria) and 9 months (Tanzania) from open cohorts. Ten randomly sampled consulting patients per cluster-month completed patient reported outcome measures. This trial was registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN17941313.

FINDINGS

Overall, 40 clusters comprising 8776 (Nigeria) and 3246 (Tanzania) patients' open cohort data were analysed (6377 [72·7%] of 8776 females in Nigeria, and 2235 [68·9%] of 3246 females in Tanzania). The mean age of the participants was 55·3 years (SD 13·9) in Nigeria and 59·2 years (14·2) in Tanzania. In Nigeria, no evidence of change in face-to-face consulting rate was observed (rate ratio [RR] 1·06, 95% CI 0·98 to 1·09; p=0·16); however, remote consultations increased four-fold (4·44, 1·34 to >10; p=0·01). In Tanzania, face-to-face (0·94, 0·61 to 1·67; p=0·99) and remote consulting rates (1·17, 0·56 to 5·57; p=0·39) were unchanged. There was no evidence of difference in prescribing rates (Nigeria: 1·05, 0·60 to 1·14; p=0·23; Tanzania: 0·92, 0·60 to 1·67; p=0·97), investigation rates (Nigeria: 1·06, 0·23 to 2·12; p=0·49; Tanzania: 1·15, 0·35 to 1·64; 0·58) or trustworthiness scores (Nigeria: mean difference 0·05, 95% CI -0·45 to 0·42; p=0·89; Tanzania: 0·07, -0·15 to 0·76; p=0·70).

INTERPRETATION

REaCH can be implemented and could improve intervention versus control health-care access. Remote consultations appear safe and trustworthy, supporting universal health coverage.

FUNDING

The UK Research and Innovation Collective Fund.

TRANSLATIONS

For the Swahili and Yoruba translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests RH has leadership or fiduciary roles as follows: Trustee at Marie Curie; co-chair of the African Palliative Care Association Research Network; member of the British HIV Association Standards steering committee; and Vice-Chair of the Worldwide Hospice Palliative Care Alliance. SIW has received standard research grants from The National Institute for Health and Care Research, Medical Research Council, and The National Institute of Mental Health (USA) as either principal and co-investigator. All other authors have no competing interests.