Hybrid Navigation Technique for Improved Precision in Implantology.
dynamic navigation
hand-eye coordination
haptic feedback
hybrid navigation
static guides
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
12
08
2023
accepted:
18
09
2023
medline:
20
10
2023
pubmed:
20
10
2023
entrez:
20
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The hybrid navigation technique involves the merging of the Dynamic navigation (DN) system (Navident, Claronav, Canada) and static navigation technique (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). Combining the advantages of both techniques, devising a protocol of hybrid navigation will be advantageous to eliminate the difficulties faced by operators in using either methods separately. Three patients requiring dental implants were included in this study. This requires the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data) and intra-oral scan (Standard Tessellation Language (STL) format) data for the accurate planning of the implant positions in both the static and dynamic approaches. The steps carried out were repeated for each of the patients, the accuracy of the implant placement was verified postoperatively by merging the CBCT data pre and post through the Evalunav software (NaviDent, Claronav). The accuracy of the implants placed were assessed based on the mesio-distal, bucco-lingual, apical deviations in distance and in angulation. The semi-robotic DN and static guide combination as a hybrid technique is an interesting method to improve the accuracy of flapless implant surgeries and can be used in cases where the anatomical landmarks are determinant factors for the implant placement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37859917
doi: 10.7759/cureus.45440
pmc: PMC10582648
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
e45440Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Chhabra et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2023 Apr 24;:
pubmed: 37191579
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:2800-3
pubmed: 23366507
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Apr;23(4):416-23
pubmed: 22092586
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019 Nov;31(4):539-547
pubmed: 31563194
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Mar 15;23(1):150
pubmed: 36918837
Bioinformation. 2023 Mar 31;19(3):290-294
pubmed: 37808368
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020 May-Jun;34(3 Suppl. 1):9-17. DENTAL SUPPLEMENT
pubmed: 32618156
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2021;31(2):51-54
pubmed: 34348013
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 22;17(6):
pubmed: 32235745
J Dent. 2022 Sep;124:104240
pubmed: 35872224
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Apr;34(4):330-341
pubmed: 36756684
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Aug;33(8):804-815
pubmed: 35652362
J Dent. 2023 May;132:104482
pubmed: 36931618
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2021;31(4):5-10
pubmed: 34587409
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jul;19(7):709-16
pubmed: 18492085
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;33(1):1-7
pubmed: 36382699
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2020;30(3):205-211
pubmed: 33463969
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Aug;26(8):882-890
pubmed: 24837492
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;33(1):31-37
pubmed: 36382702
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2020;30(3):165-172
pubmed: 33463963
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;33(1):57-66
pubmed: 36382705
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Aug;23(4):635-643
pubmed: 34288341
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):266-71
pubmed: 25505256
J Vis Exp. 2022 Sep 13;(187):
pubmed: 36190264