Identification of algal rich microbial blooms in the Sellafield Pile Fuel Storage Pond and the application of ultrasonic treatment to control the formation of blooms.
Chrysophyceae
Pile Fuel Storage Pond
algae bloom
spent nuclear fuel pond
ultrasonic treatment
Journal
Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
19
07
2023
accepted:
19
09
2023
medline:
20
10
2023
pubmed:
20
10
2023
entrez:
20
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The presence of microorganisms in a range of nuclear facilities has been known for many years. In this study the microbial community inhabiting the Pile Fuel Storage Pond (PFSP), which is a legacy open-aired facility on the Sellafield nuclear site, Cumbria, UK, was determined to help target microbial bloom management strategies in this facility. The PFSP is currently undergoing decommissioning and the development of prolonged dense microbial blooms reduces the visibility within the water. Such impairment in the pond water visibility can lead to delays in pond operations, which also has financial implications. Efforts to control the microbial population within the PFSP are ongoing, with the installation of ultrasonic treatment units. Here next generation sequencing techniques focussing on broad targets for both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms were used to identify the microbial community. On-site monitoring of photosynthetic pigments indicated when microbial blooms formed and that eukaryotic algae were most likely to be responsible for these events. The sequencing data suggested that the blooms were dominated by members of the class Chrysophyceae, a group of golden algae, while evidence of cyanobacteria and other photosynthetic bacteria was limited, further supporting eukaryotic organisms causing the blooms. The results of sequencing data from 2018 was used to inform a change in the operational settings of the ultrasonic units, while monitoring of the microbial community and photosynthetic pigments trends was extended. Since the changes were made to the ultrasonic treatment, the visibility in the pond was significantly improved, with an absence of a spring bloom in 2020 and an overall reduction in the number of days lost due to microbial blooms annually. This work extends our knowledge of the diversity of microbes able to colonise nuclear fuel storage ponds, and also suggests that sequencing data can help to optimise the performance of ultrasonic treatments, to control algal proliferation in the PFSP facility and other inhospitable engineered systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37860139
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1261801
pmc: PMC10582928
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1261801Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Foster, Boothman, Harrison, Jenkinson, Pittman and Lloyd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
PJ was employed by Sellafield Ltd. The authors declare that this study received funding from Sellafield Ltd. and NNL. The funders had the following involvement in the study: authors from Sellafield and NNL reviewed the manuscript and provided approval and clearance for the publication of the manuscript; Sellafield Ltd. provided the pond water samples and detailed pond data collected as part of routine operations.
Références
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 10;720:137515
pubmed: 32325573
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014 Oct;359(1):81-4
pubmed: 25091383
J Phycol. 2016 Oct;52(5):689-703
pubmed: 27470701
J Plant Physiol. 2008 Nov 28;165(17):1783-97
pubmed: 18313796
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Jun;34(6):433-41
pubmed: 17426994
Int Microbiol. 2005 Sep;8(3):223-30
pubmed: 16200501
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jul;25(21):20518-20526
pubmed: 29063404
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;79(17):5112-20
pubmed: 23793624
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0205228
pubmed: 30286173
Microbiology (Reading). 2005 May;151(Pt 5):1671-1682
pubmed: 15870474
J Hazard Mater. 2023 Mar 5;445:130556
pubmed: 37055967
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2018 Jun 20;20(6):956-964
pubmed: 29774347
Metabolites. 2013 May 30;3(2):463-83
pubmed: 24958001
Res Microbiol. 2002 Jan-Feb;153(1):7-12
pubmed: 11881900
mBio. 2018 Jun 26;9(3):
pubmed: 29946053
Ultrason Sonochem. 2010 Aug;17(6):1041-8
pubmed: 20083420
Front Microbiol. 2012 Aug 28;3:305
pubmed: 22973263
Front Microbiol. 2018 Mar 09;9:377
pubmed: 29593667
Commun Biol. 2021 Mar 12;4(1):328
pubmed: 33712682
Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):494-504
pubmed: 21212162
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jun;78(12):4481-9
pubmed: 22492459
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
pubmed: 17586664
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2007;33(3):183-209
pubmed: 17653987
Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1
pubmed: 20709691
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 23;9(10):e110769
pubmed: 25340824
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009 Mar;7(3):237-45
pubmed: 19172147
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005 Apr;32(4):155-62
pubmed: 15778866
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Feb 14;13:31
pubmed: 22333067
Front Microbiol. 2020 Apr 07;11:515
pubmed: 32318035
PeerJ. 2016 Oct 18;4:e2584
pubmed: 27781170
Biofouling. 2004 Feb;20(1):35-42
pubmed: 15079891
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 15;9(9):e106679
pubmed: 25221928
Front Microbiol. 2020 Nov 24;11:587556
pubmed: 33329459
Science. 2004 Nov 5;306(5698):1025-8
pubmed: 15459345