Molecular detection of Aphanomyces astaci - An improved species specific qPCR assay.

The parasitic oomycete Aphanomyces astaci is the causative agent of crayfish plague, a devastating disease for European freshwater crayfish. Species specific quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) can offer rapid detection of the pathogen. However, the well established A. astaci qPCR assay recommended by the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) amplifies the recently described Aphanomyces fennicus. Consequently, false-positive results may occur. This calls for the improvement of the established species specific A. astaci qPCR assay in order to avoid amplifying A. fennicus while screening for A. astaci. We developed an improved species specific A. astaci qPCR assay and validated the assay across three laboratories, using established procedures including different qPCR master mixes for each respective laboratory. Genomic DNA from A. astaci, A. fennicus and closely related Aphanomyces spp. was analysed and compared with both the improved and established assay. Additionally, DNA from crayfish tissue and environmental samples were analysed with both assays. The improved assay showed similar sensitivity with the established assay for all sample types, while proving highly specific for A. astaci avoiding amplification of A. fennicus and the other tested Aphanomyces spp. Environmental DNA (eDNA) samples collected at River Lierelva in Norway amplified with the established assay, but not with the improved assay indicating false positive. We were able to sequence a 530 bp fragment of the ITS region from these eDNA samples and the consensus sequence showed 99.9-100 % pairwise identity with A. fennicus and 97.2-98 % pairwise identity with A. astaci, suggesting that the occurrence of A. fennicus is not limited to Finland, where it was first discovered.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.