Prediction of key milk biomarkers in dairy cows through milk MIR spectra and international collaborations.

Fourier transform mid-infrared spectrometry fertility ketosis mastitis negative energy balance

Journal

Journal of dairy science
ISSN: 1525-3198
Titre abrégé: J Dairy Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985126R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 06 06 2023
accepted: 23 09 2023
medline: 21 10 2023
pubmed: 21 10 2023
entrez: 20 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

At the individual cow level, sub-optimum fertility, mastitis, negative energy balance and ketosis are major issues in dairy farming. These problems are widespread on dairy farms and have an important economic impact. The objectives of this study were: 1) to assess the potential of milk Mid Infrared (MIR) spectra to predict key biomarkers of energy deficit (citrate, isocitrate, glucose-6P, free glucose), ketosis (BHB and acetone), mastitis (NAGase and LDH), and fertility (progesterone); 2) to test alternative methodologies to partial least square regression (PLS) to better account for the specific asymmetric distribution of the biomarkers; and 3) to create robust models by merging large data sets from 5 international or national projects. Benefiting from this international collaboration, the data set comprised a total of 9,143 milk samples from 3,758 cows located in 589 herds across 10 countries and represented 7 breeds. The samples were analyzed by reference chemistry for biomarker contents while the MIR analyses were performed on 30 instruments from different models and brands, with spectra harmonized into a common format. Four quantitative methodologies were evaluated to address the strongly skewed distribution of some biomarkers. PLS was used as the reference basis, and compared with a random modification of distribution associated with PLS (Random-downsampling-PLS), an optimized modification of distribution associated with PLS (KennardStone-downsampling-PLS) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). When the ability of MIR to predict biomarkers was too low for quantification, different qualitative methodologies were tested to discriminate low vs high values of biomarkers. For each biomarker, 20% of the herds were randomly removed within all countries to be used as the validation data set. The remaining 80% of herds were used as the calibration data set. In calibration, the 3 alternative methodologies outperform the PLS performances for the majority of biomarkers. However, in the external herd validation, PLS provided the best results for isocitrate, glucose-6P, free glucose and LDH (R

Identifiants

pubmed: 37863287
pii: S0022-0302(23)00757-9
doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23843
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Auteurs

C Grelet (C)

Walloon Agricultural Research Center (CRA-W), Gembloux, Belgium.

T Larsen (T)

Dept Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.

M A Crowe (MA)

University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.

D C Wathes (DC)

Royal Veterinary College (RVC), London, United Kingdom.

C P Ferris (CP)

Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Belfast, Northern Ireland.

K L Ingvartsen (KL)

Dept Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.

C Marchitelli (C)

Research Center for Animal Production and Aquaculture (CREA), Roma, Italy.

F Becker (F)

Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany.

A Vanlierde (A)

Walloon Agricultural Research Center (CRA-W), Gembloux, Belgium.

J Leblois (J)

EEIG European Milk Recording (EMR), Ciney, Belgium.

U Schuler (U)

Qualitas, Zug, Switzerland.

F J Auer (FJ)

LKV-Austria, Vienna, Austria.

A Köck (A)

ZuchtData, Vienna, Austria.

L Dale (L)

LKV Baden Württemberg, Stuttgart, Germany.

J Sölkner (J)

University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

O Christophe (O)

Walloon Agricultural Research Center (CRA-W), Gembloux, Belgium.

J Hummel (J)

University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

A Mensching (A)

University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

J A Fernández Pierna (JAF)

Walloon Agricultural Research Center (CRA-W), Gembloux, Belgium.

H Soyeurt (H)

University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (Ulg-GxABT), Gembloux, Belgium.

M Calmels (M)

Seenovia, Saint Berthevin, France.

R Reding (R)

Convis, Ettelbruck, Luxembourg.

M Gelé (M)

Idele, Paris, France.

Y Chen (Y)

University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (Ulg-GxABT), Gembloux, Belgium.

N Gengler (N)

University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (Ulg-GxABT), Gembloux, Belgium.

F Dehareng (F)

Walloon Agricultural Research Center (CRA-W), Gembloux, Belgium. Electronic address: f.dehareng@cra.wallonie.be.

Classifications MeSH