A Retrospective Database Analysis to Investigate Treatment Patterns and Health Care Resource Utilisation in Patients who CYCLe AntiMuscarinics in ENgland (CYCLAMEN).

Antimuscarinics Clinical Practice Research Datalink Database analysis Health care resource utilisation Overactive bladder Treatment patterns United Kingdom

Journal

European urology focus
ISSN: 2405-4569
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Focus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101665661

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 02 02 2023
revised: 13 09 2023
accepted: 27 09 2023
medline: 21 10 2023
pubmed: 21 10 2023
entrez: 20 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Patients with overactive bladder may cycle through different antimuscarinic medications even though there is limited evidence to support this approach. To describe treatment patterns and the associated health care resource utilisation (HCRU) according to antimuscarinic cycling groups. The CYCLe AntiMuscarinics in ENgland (CYCLAMEN) study was a retrospective observational investigation that used primary care records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database linked to Hospital Episode Statistics secondary care data. Eligible patients (≥18 yr) were prescribed their first antimuscarinic between January 2014 and December 2017. Patients were categorised into groups prescribed one, two, or three or more (groups 1-3) consecutive unique antimuscarinics over 18 mo. The HCRU rate and costs were calculated for the period of continuous antimuscarinic therapy (first antimuscarinic treatment episode) and the 18-mo follow-up period. Treatment sequence patterns were displayed using sunburst plots and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess time on treatment. Overall, 35 369 patients were included, of whom 31 760 (89.8%) received one antimuscarinic (group 1), 3182 (9.0%) received two (group 2), and 427 (1.2%) received three or more (group 3). The most common initial antimuscarinics were solifenacin (13 628 patients, 42.9%) in group 1, and oxybutynin in group 2 (1267 patients, 39.8%) and group 3 (200 patients, 46.8%). The median duration of the first antimuscarinic treatment episode was 57 d and <20% of patients were receiving any antimuscarinic after 18 mo. The number of primary care visits and mean costs increased across groups. The reasons for cycling could not be identified in this study. Approximately 10% of patients underwent sequential cycling with two or more antimuscarinics. Furthermore, as the majority discontinued treatment within 18 mo, there is a need to improve the management of these patients in the clinical care setting. We investigated treatment patterns and health care use for patients with overactive bladder who were prescribed at least one antimuscarinic drug (AMD), which are drugs that reduce some of the impulses passing from the bladder to the brain. Around 10% of patients accessing primary health care in England received more than one sequential AMD. Most patients discontinued treatment, which may indicate inadequate management of their condition. Prescription of a higher number of AMDs was associated with higher health care costs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patients with overactive bladder may cycle through different antimuscarinic medications even though there is limited evidence to support this approach.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To describe treatment patterns and the associated health care resource utilisation (HCRU) according to antimuscarinic cycling groups.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS METHODS
The CYCLe AntiMuscarinics in ENgland (CYCLAMEN) study was a retrospective observational investigation that used primary care records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database linked to Hospital Episode Statistics secondary care data. Eligible patients (≥18 yr) were prescribed their first antimuscarinic between January 2014 and December 2017. Patients were categorised into groups prescribed one, two, or three or more (groups 1-3) consecutive unique antimuscarinics over 18 mo.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS
The HCRU rate and costs were calculated for the period of continuous antimuscarinic therapy (first antimuscarinic treatment episode) and the 18-mo follow-up period. Treatment sequence patterns were displayed using sunburst plots and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess time on treatment.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Overall, 35 369 patients were included, of whom 31 760 (89.8%) received one antimuscarinic (group 1), 3182 (9.0%) received two (group 2), and 427 (1.2%) received three or more (group 3). The most common initial antimuscarinics were solifenacin (13 628 patients, 42.9%) in group 1, and oxybutynin in group 2 (1267 patients, 39.8%) and group 3 (200 patients, 46.8%). The median duration of the first antimuscarinic treatment episode was 57 d and <20% of patients were receiving any antimuscarinic after 18 mo. The number of primary care visits and mean costs increased across groups. The reasons for cycling could not be identified in this study.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Approximately 10% of patients underwent sequential cycling with two or more antimuscarinics. Furthermore, as the majority discontinued treatment within 18 mo, there is a need to improve the management of these patients in the clinical care setting.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
We investigated treatment patterns and health care use for patients with overactive bladder who were prescribed at least one antimuscarinic drug (AMD), which are drugs that reduce some of the impulses passing from the bladder to the brain. Around 10% of patients accessing primary health care in England received more than one sequential AMD. Most patients discontinued treatment, which may indicate inadequate management of their condition. Prescription of a higher number of AMDs was associated with higher health care costs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37863737
pii: S2405-4569(23)00217-1
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.09.017
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Jon Rees (J)

Brockway Medical Centre, Tyntesfield Medical Group, Bristol, UK.

Rodrigo Martins de Almeida (R)

Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd., Addlestone, UK.

Mahmood Ali (M)

Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd., Addlestone, UK. Electronic address: mahmood_ali@astellas.com.

Patrick J O Covernton (PJO)

Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd., Addlestone, UK.

Matthias Stoelzel (M)

Data Science, Astellas Pharma B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands.

Kirsten M Leyland (KM)

Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd., Addlestone, UK.

Lucy Irwin (L)

Astellas Pharma Ltd., Woking, UK.

Ludmila Scrine (L)

Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd., Addlestone, UK.

Merete Kock Hansen (MK)

Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd., Addlestone, UK.

Christopher Chapple (C)

Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

Classifications MeSH