Digital elevation models of the sea-ice surface from airborne laser scanning during MOSAiC.
Journal
Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
Titre abrégé: Sci Data
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 10 2023
20 10 2023
Historique:
received:
19
12
2022
accepted:
14
09
2023
medline:
21
10
2023
pubmed:
21
10
2023
entrez:
20
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Airborne laser scanners (ALS) are used to map the sea-ice surface at sub-meter resolution. We conducted 64 flights over the Arctic sea ice between September 2019 and September 2020 during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition to measure sea-ice surface elevation. The flights ranged from repeated, local-scale 5 × 5 km
Identifiants
pubmed: 37863900
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02565-6
pii: 10.1038/s41597-023-02565-6
pmc: PMC10589245
doi:
Types de publication
Dataset
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
729Subventions
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research)
ID : 03F0866A
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research)
ID : 03F0866A
Organisme : United States Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
ID : NA20OAR4320271 - 2023-1311
Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Ketchum, R. D. Airborne Laser Profiling of the Arctic Pack Ice. Remote Sensing of Environment 2, 41–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(71)90076-9 (1971).
doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(71)90076-9
European Space Agency. CryoVEx/ICESat-2 Summer 2019. Tech. Rep., European Space Agency, https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-b72e63c (2022).
MacGregor, J. A. et al. The Scientific Legacy of NASA’s Operation IceBridge. Reviews of Geophysics, 59, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000712 (2021).
Jutila, A. et al. Retrieval and parameterisation of sea-ice bulk density from airborne multi-sensor measurements. The Cryosphere 16, 259–275, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-259-2022 (2022).
doi: 10.5194/tc-16-259-2022
Quartly, G. D. et al. Retrieving Sea Level and Freeboard in the Arctic: A Review of Current Radar Altimetry Methodologies and Future Perspectives. Remote Sensing 11, 881, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070881 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/rs11070881
Connor, L. N., Laxon, S. W., Ridout, A. L., Krabill, W. B. & McAdoo, D. C. Comparison of Envisat radar and airborne laser altimeter measurements over Arctic sea ice. Remote Sensing of Environment 113, 563–570, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.015 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.015
Kurtz, N. T. et al. Comparison of ICESat Data With Airborne Laser Altimeter Measurements Over Arctic Sea Ice. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 46, 1913–1924, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.916639 (2008).
doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2008.916639
Yi, D. et al. Comparing Coincident Elevation and Freeboard From IceBridge and Five Different CryoSat-2 Retrackers. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 57, 1219–1229, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2865257 (2019).
doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2865257
Armitage, T. W. K. & Ridout, A. L. Arctic sea ice freeboard from AltiKa and comparison with CryoSat-2 and Operation IceBridge. Geophysical Research Letters 42, 6724–6731, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064823 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/2015GL064823
Ricker, R., Hendricks, S. & Beckers, J. F. The impact of geophysical corrections on sea-ice freeboard retrieved from satellite altimetry. Remote Sensing 8, 317, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040317 (2016).
doi: 10.3390/rs8040317
Shen, X. et al. Assessment of Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Estimates From ICESat-2 Using IceBird Airborne Measurements. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 59, 3764–3775, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3022945 (2021).
doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3022945
Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung. Polar Research and Supply Vessel POLARSTERN operated by the Alfred-Wegener-Institute. Journal of large-scale research facilities JLSRF 3, A119, https://doi.org/10.17815/jlsrf-3-163 (2017).
doi: 10.17815/jlsrf-3-163
Nicolaus, M. et al. Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Snow and sea ice. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 10, 000046, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.000046 (2022).
doi: 10.1525/elementa.2021.000046
RIEGL Laser Measurement Systems GmbH. RIEGL VQ-580 data sheet. http://www.riegl.com/uploads/tx_pxpriegldownloads/DataSheet_VQ-580_2015-03-23.pdf (2015).
SENSOR. Device Information: Riegl VQ-580 s9999057. AWI Sensor Information System, https://hdl.handle.net/10013/sensor.7ebb63c3-dc3b-4f0f-9ca5-f1c6e5462a31 (2022).
SENSOR. Device Information: Riegl VQ-580 s9997784. AWI Sensor Information System, https://hdl.handle.net/10013/sensor.7a931b33-72ca-46d0-b623-156836ac9550 (2022).
SENSOR. Device Information: Applanix AP60-Air. AWI Sensor Information System, https://hdl.handle.net/10013/sensor.a9fee346-91e7-4eed-9f2f-89f1368e53a0 (2022).
Thielke, L. et al. Sea ice surface temperatures from helicopter-borne thermal infrared imaging during the MOSAiC expedition. Scientific Data 9, 364, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01461-9 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01461-9
pubmed: 35752618
pmcid: 9233694
Neckel, N. et al. Helicopter-borne RGB orthomosaics and photogrammetric digital elevation models from the MOSAiC Expedition. Scientific Data 10, 426, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02318-5 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02318-5
pubmed: 37400570
pmcid: 10318053
Wu, Y., He, C. & Liu, G. On inertial navigation and attitude initialization in polar areas. Satellite Navigation 1, 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43020-019-0002-4 (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s43020-019-0002-4
Paturel, Y., Lacambre, J.-B., Patin, F. & Moynagh, C. Inertial navigation at high latitude: Trials and test results. In OCEANS 2015 - MTS/IEEE Washington, 1–5 https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS.2015.7401904 (2015).
Andersen, O. B. DTU21 Mean Sea Surface, https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.19383221.v1 (2022).
Krumpen, T. et al. MOSAiC drift expedition from October 2019 to July 2020: sea ice conditions from space and comparison with previous years. The Cryosphere 15, 3897–3920 (2021).
doi: 10.5194/tc-15-3897-2021
Itkin, P. et al. Contribution of Deformation to Sea Ice Mass Balance: A Case Study From an N-ICE2015 Storm. Geophysical Research Letters 45, 789–796, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl076056 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/2017gl076056
SENSOR. Device Information: Motion Sensor Hydrins 1. AWI Sensor Information System, https://hdl.handle.net/10013/sensor.9ec5232e-9b30-492f-9741-63f056691cad (2022).
Kwok, R., Cunningham, G. F., Manizade, S. S. & Krabill, W. B. Arctic sea ice freeboard from IceBridge acquisitions in 2009: Estimates and comparisons with ICESat. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans117 https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007654 (2012).
Ricker, R., Hendricks, S. & Beckers, J. F. The Impact of Geophysical Corrections on Sea-Ice Freeboard Retrieved from Satellite Altimetry. Remote Sensing 8, 317, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040317 (2016).
doi: 10.3390/rs8040317
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods 17, 261–272, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
pubmed: 32015543
pmcid: 7056644
Hendricks, S. et al. Helicopter position and attitude during laser scanner flights of the MOSAiC expedition, version 1. PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.950278 (2022).
Jutila, A. et al. Geolocated sea-ice or snow surface elevation point cloud segments from helicopter-borne laser scanner during the MOSAiC expedition, version 1. PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.950509 (2023).
Hutter, N. et al. Gridded segments of sea-ice or snow surface elevation and freeboard from helicopter-borne laser scanner during the MOSAiC expedition, version 1. PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.950339 (2023).
Hutter, N. et al. Merged grids of sea-ice or snow freeboard from helicopter-borne laser scanner during the MOSAiC expedition, version 1. PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.950896 (2023).
Beckers, J. F., Renner, A. H., Spreen, G., Gerland, S. & Haas, C. Sea-ice surface roughness estimates from airborne laser scanner and laser altimeter observations in Fram Strait and north of Svalbard. Annals of Glaciology 56, 235–244, https://doi.org/10.3189/2015AoG69A717 (2015).
doi: 10.3189/2015AoG69A717
Duncan, K. & Farrell, S. L. Determining Variability in Arctic Sea Ice Pressure Ridge Topography With ICESat-2. Geophysical Research Letters 49, e2022GL100272, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100272 (2022).
doi: 10.1029/2022GL100272
Kwok, R. et al. ATLAS/ICESat-2 L3A Sea Ice Freeboard, Version 5, https://doi.org/10.5067/ATLAS/ATL10.005 (2021).
Ricker, R. et al. Linking scales of sea ice surface topography: evaluation of ICESat-2 measurements with coincident helicopter laser scanning during MOSAiC. The Cryosphere 17, 1411–1429, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1411-2023 (2023).
doi: 10.5194/tc-17-1411-2023
Hutter, N. et al. Gridded airborne laserscanner (ALS) elevation data (L4) for three flights during MOSAiC (prerelease). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5121824 (2021).
Webster, M. A. et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of melt ponds on Arctic sea ice. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 10, 000072, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.000072 (2022).
doi: 10.1525/elementa.2021.000072
Smith, M. M. et al. Quantifying false bottoms and under-ice meltwater layers beneath Arctic summer sea ice with fine-scale observations. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 10, 000116, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.000116 (2022).
doi: 10.1525/elementa.2021.000116
Hendricks, S., Hutter, N. & Jutila, A. awi-als-toolbox/awi-als-toolbox: v1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7420215 (2022).
Nixdorf, U. et al. MOSAiC Extended Acknowledgement. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5541624 (2021).