A qualitative investigation of uninsured patient and primary care provider perspectives on specialty care eConsults.
Access to Care
Health Disparities
Patient perspectives
Primary care
Provider perspectives
eConsults
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Oct 2023
20 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
03
05
2023
accepted:
28
09
2023
medline:
31
10
2023
pubmed:
21
10
2023
entrez:
20
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Uninsured and underinsured patients face specialty care access disparities that prevent them from obtaining the care they need and negatively impact their health and well-being. We aimed to understand how making specialty care electronic consultations (eConsults) available at a multi-site Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in central Texas affected uninsured patients' care-seeking experiences and impacted their ability to receive the needed care. We used concepts from Ecological Systems Theory to examine individual, interpersonal, organization-level, social, and health policy environment factors that impacted patients' access to specialty care and the use of eConsults. We conducted thematic analysis of semi-structured, qualitative interviews with patients about seeking specialty care while uninsured and with uninsured patients and FQHC PCPs about their experience using eConsults to obtain specialists' recommendations. Patients and PCPs identified out-of-pocket cost, stigma, a paucity of local specialists willing to see uninsured patients, time and difficulty associated with travel and transportation to specialty visits, and health policy limitations as barriers to obtaining specialty care. Benefits of using eConsults for uninsured patients included minimizing/avoiding financial stress, expanding access to care, expanding scope of primary care, and expediting access to specialists. Concerns about the model included patients' limited understanding of eConsults, concern about cost, and worry whether eConsults could appropriately meet their specialty needs. Findings suggest that eConsults delivered in a primary care FQHC addressed uninsured patients' specialty care access concerns. They helped to address financial and geographic barriers, provided time and cost savings to patients, expanded FQHC PCPs' knowledge and care provision options, and allowed patients to receive more care in primary care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Uninsured and underinsured patients face specialty care access disparities that prevent them from obtaining the care they need and negatively impact their health and well-being. We aimed to understand how making specialty care electronic consultations (eConsults) available at a multi-site Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in central Texas affected uninsured patients' care-seeking experiences and impacted their ability to receive the needed care.
METHODS
METHODS
We used concepts from Ecological Systems Theory to examine individual, interpersonal, organization-level, social, and health policy environment factors that impacted patients' access to specialty care and the use of eConsults. We conducted thematic analysis of semi-structured, qualitative interviews with patients about seeking specialty care while uninsured and with uninsured patients and FQHC PCPs about their experience using eConsults to obtain specialists' recommendations.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Patients and PCPs identified out-of-pocket cost, stigma, a paucity of local specialists willing to see uninsured patients, time and difficulty associated with travel and transportation to specialty visits, and health policy limitations as barriers to obtaining specialty care. Benefits of using eConsults for uninsured patients included minimizing/avoiding financial stress, expanding access to care, expanding scope of primary care, and expediting access to specialists. Concerns about the model included patients' limited understanding of eConsults, concern about cost, and worry whether eConsults could appropriately meet their specialty needs.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Findings suggest that eConsults delivered in a primary care FQHC addressed uninsured patients' specialty care access concerns. They helped to address financial and geographic barriers, provided time and cost savings to patients, expanded FQHC PCPs' knowledge and care provision options, and allowed patients to receive more care in primary care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37864170
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10086-6
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-10086-6
pmc: PMC10589958
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1133Subventions
Organisme : St David's Foundation
ID : N/A
Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Scientifica (Cairo). 2012;2012:432892
pubmed: 24278694
BMC Med. 2019 Feb 15;17(1):25
pubmed: 30764806
Ann Fam Med. 2020 Jan;18(1):35-41
pubmed: 31937531
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Nov;26(11):1383-1390
pubmed: 32023182
Healthc (Amst). 2017 Mar;5(1-2):40-45
pubmed: 27469441
Milbank Q. 2011 Mar;89(1):39-68
pubmed: 21418312
Natl Health Stat Report. 2022 Feb;(169):1-15
pubmed: 35166656
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):920
pubmed: 34488758
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7:CD006732
pubmed: 30025154
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 May 21;2(5):e210456
pubmed: 35977310
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jan 1;24(1):e9-e16
pubmed: 29350511
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021 Mar;41:25-36
pubmed: 34010056
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):492-499
pubmed: 28264951
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Oct;89(10):1416-26
pubmed: 24889514
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Mar;25(3):184-198
pubmed: 29927711
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 18;19(1):974
pubmed: 31852493
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;27(3):471-479
pubmed: 31621847
Fam Med. 2017 Feb;49(2):91-96
pubmed: 28218933
J Telemed Telecare. 2019 Sep;25(8):493-498
pubmed: 29991315
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(2):779-789
pubmed: 35574876
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):3440
pubmed: 26745338
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;41(1):161-180
pubmed: 28025774
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502
pubmed: 16202000
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Milbank Q. 2022 Jun;100(2):504-524
pubmed: 35411969
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):459-466
pubmed: 34845581
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 13;4(5):e001629
pubmed: 31565409
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Oct;61(4):492-500
pubmed: 34229931
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar;14(2):133-40
pubmed: 26951588
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Feb;78(2):293-302
pubmed: 29061478
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 23;6(6):e010920
pubmed: 27338880
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jan 23;172(2):163-70
pubmed: 22271124
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):2031-2036
pubmed: 30633678
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):782-789
pubmed: 29801079